Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "There are no more juniors.

"There are no more juniors.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
54 Posts 29 Posters 58 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

    "There are no more juniors. There was a funeral for their passing in 2024. Nobody came. The machine does what they do now, but cheaper. Of course, juniors weren't valuable for what they produced, they were valuable for who they would become: the senior engineer who knows where the bodies are buried. We optimized for output, and abolished apprenticeship. A few years from now, we'll wonder where all the seniors are. We shot them. Nobody will remember."

    Programming Still Sucks. — Writing

    Sorry Peter. — I'm at a birthday party, and while most people here also work in tech, there's always a Guy with a Real Job. You know, a physical job, building some or other thing people need. And this Guy always asks some variant of the same question: aren't you worried AI is taking your job? I glance around and see a few faces turning around toward us, rolling their eyes ever so slightly before returning to their previous conversation. Yes, this question again.

    favicon

    (www.stvn.sh)

    K This user is from outside of this forum
    K This user is from outside of this forum
    kramaker@social.vivaldi.net
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @tante Probably the most literate summary of our times I've read. Nice work. Anyone that can wield natural language like this would have been a force with formal language(s) and context-free grammars.
    You might enjoy: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05280v2

    I certainly am.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

      "There are no more juniors. There was a funeral for their passing in 2024. Nobody came. The machine does what they do now, but cheaper. Of course, juniors weren't valuable for what they produced, they were valuable for who they would become: the senior engineer who knows where the bodies are buried. We optimized for output, and abolished apprenticeship. A few years from now, we'll wonder where all the seniors are. We shot them. Nobody will remember."

      Programming Still Sucks. — Writing

      Sorry Peter. — I'm at a birthday party, and while most people here also work in tech, there's always a Guy with a Real Job. You know, a physical job, building some or other thing people need. And this Guy always asks some variant of the same question: aren't you worried AI is taking your job? I glance around and see a few faces turning around toward us, rolling their eyes ever so slightly before returning to their previous conversation. Yes, this question again.

      favicon

      (www.stvn.sh)

      tezoatlipoca@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
      tezoatlipoca@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
      tezoatlipoca@mas.to
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @tante

      This is fantastic and unfortunately true.

      I am Sara, tunnelling under Mordor with a USB stick. I have attempted to document the cron job and institutionalize the periodic nudge it needs to run payroll... but then I get yelled at for not videcoding enough new featureslop. There are no juniors for me to explain the cron job too.

      Perhaps the AI may one dayabsorb the wiki page about the cron job. Hopefully someone else thinks to ask the AI about why payroll didn't run.

      darwinwoodka@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • 8r3n7@mstdn.ca8 8r3n7@mstdn.ca

        @tante Why are managers—self-proclaimed “leaders”—the most vulnerable to group think? Or is it that group-thinkers are the most likely to go into management, with the wrong understanding, and the wrong incentives?

        Meanwhile, the investors—assholes randomly selected from the same pool—are chasing unicorns, but don’t know what one looks like. So they throw mountains of cash at donkeys wearing dunce caps, until one of them shits out a golden bar of digital heroin.

        zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
        zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
        zimzat@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @8r3n7 @tante

        Incentives are aligned to the production of incentives. If it's easier to fake work than to actually work then folks are further incentivized to do less for more (or do more for more). It's also easier to ignore a problem than to fix it (in the short-term).

        I think it's because humanity is already at or past the point of becoming post-scarcity. Part of that is society struggling to let go of the impulses and incentives born from scarcity.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

          "There are no more juniors. There was a funeral for their passing in 2024. Nobody came. The machine does what they do now, but cheaper. Of course, juniors weren't valuable for what they produced, they were valuable for who they would become: the senior engineer who knows where the bodies are buried. We optimized for output, and abolished apprenticeship. A few years from now, we'll wonder where all the seniors are. We shot them. Nobody will remember."

          Programming Still Sucks. — Writing

          Sorry Peter. — I'm at a birthday party, and while most people here also work in tech, there's always a Guy with a Real Job. You know, a physical job, building some or other thing people need. And this Guy always asks some variant of the same question: aren't you worried AI is taking your job? I glance around and see a few faces turning around toward us, rolling their eyes ever so slightly before returning to their previous conversation. Yes, this question again.

          favicon

          (www.stvn.sh)

          kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
          kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
          kkarhan@c.im
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @tante classic #LadderPulling will implode shit.

          And the then-seniors will be able to charge big time for training their replacements…

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

            "There are no more juniors. There was a funeral for their passing in 2024. Nobody came. The machine does what they do now, but cheaper. Of course, juniors weren't valuable for what they produced, they were valuable for who they would become: the senior engineer who knows where the bodies are buried. We optimized for output, and abolished apprenticeship. A few years from now, we'll wonder where all the seniors are. We shot them. Nobody will remember."

            Programming Still Sucks. — Writing

            Sorry Peter. — I'm at a birthday party, and while most people here also work in tech, there's always a Guy with a Real Job. You know, a physical job, building some or other thing people need. And this Guy always asks some variant of the same question: aren't you worried AI is taking your job? I glance around and see a few faces turning around toward us, rolling their eyes ever so slightly before returning to their previous conversation. Yes, this question again.

            favicon

            (www.stvn.sh)

            firepoet@tech.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
            firepoet@tech.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
            firepoet@tech.lgbt
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @tante So right…

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

              @tante

              April 26 Fortune magazine quoted an Nvidia VP saying that AI costs far more than human workers.

              Ed Zitron reported on the economic realities of the current subscriptions offered by big tech versus the actual cost, found in token usage. The ratio of income to token costs something between five and 12, depending on the subscription charges.

              And this figure doesn’t take into account the debt these companies have to service as well.

              That’s some kind of productivity increase

              felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              felix_eckhardt@det.social
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @GhostOnTheHalfShell @tante that is completely correct. But we all know that computational power gets cheaper every year. Question is: will it get profitable soon enough or are AI companies going bankrupt before this happens?

              stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizzaS ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                "There are no more juniors. There was a funeral for their passing in 2024. Nobody came. The machine does what they do now, but cheaper. Of course, juniors weren't valuable for what they produced, they were valuable for who they would become: the senior engineer who knows where the bodies are buried. We optimized for output, and abolished apprenticeship. A few years from now, we'll wonder where all the seniors are. We shot them. Nobody will remember."

                Programming Still Sucks. — Writing

                Sorry Peter. — I'm at a birthday party, and while most people here also work in tech, there's always a Guy with a Real Job. You know, a physical job, building some or other thing people need. And this Guy always asks some variant of the same question: aren't you worried AI is taking your job? I glance around and see a few faces turning around toward us, rolling their eyes ever so slightly before returning to their previous conversation. Yes, this question again.

                favicon

                (www.stvn.sh)

                stevendotjs@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                stevendotjs@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                stevendotjs@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @tante oh hey I wrote this! Thanks for sharing!

                linkshaender@bildung.socialL tante@tldr.nettime.orgT joy_intl@mastodon.onlineJ inkomtech@infosec.exchangeI dalehagglund@hachyderm.ioD 5 Replies Last reply
                0
                • felix_eckhardt@det.socialF felix_eckhardt@det.social

                  @GhostOnTheHalfShell @tante that is completely correct. But we all know that computational power gets cheaper every year. Question is: will it get profitable soon enough or are AI companies going bankrupt before this happens?

                  stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizzaS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizzaS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizza
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @felix_eckhardt @GhostOnTheHalfShell @tante Or if they'll burn up the countryside and destroy the aquifers with the required datacenters.

                  felix_eckhardt@det.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizzaS stumpythemutt@social.linux.pizza

                    @felix_eckhardt @GhostOnTheHalfShell @tante Or if they'll burn up the countryside and destroy the aquifers with the required datacenters.

                    felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                    felix_eckhardt@det.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @StumpyTheMutt @GhostOnTheHalfShell @tante its sad, that it does not sound far fetched.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                      "There are no more juniors. There was a funeral for their passing in 2024. Nobody came. The machine does what they do now, but cheaper. Of course, juniors weren't valuable for what they produced, they were valuable for who they would become: the senior engineer who knows where the bodies are buried. We optimized for output, and abolished apprenticeship. A few years from now, we'll wonder where all the seniors are. We shot them. Nobody will remember."

                      Programming Still Sucks. — Writing

                      Sorry Peter. — I'm at a birthday party, and while most people here also work in tech, there's always a Guy with a Real Job. You know, a physical job, building some or other thing people need. And this Guy always asks some variant of the same question: aren't you worried AI is taking your job? I glance around and see a few faces turning around toward us, rolling their eyes ever so slightly before returning to their previous conversation. Yes, this question again.

                      favicon

                      (www.stvn.sh)

                      felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                      felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                      felix_eckhardt@det.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @tante we might not need any human coder, when no senior is available anymore. It was similar with other professions.

                      nfoonf@chaos.socialN toriver@mas.toT 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • felix_eckhardt@det.socialF felix_eckhardt@det.social

                        @GhostOnTheHalfShell @tante that is completely correct. But we all know that computational power gets cheaper every year. Question is: will it get profitable soon enough or are AI companies going bankrupt before this happens?

                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @felix_eckhardt @tante

                        The systems get more and more expensive. They may be more powerful, but they aren’t getting less expensive. They’re getting more expensive.

                        Given that the lifetime of the computational units is between one and three years before they burn out or become obsolete, the window of time they must recoup their cost and make a profit is tiny. This isn’t like laying fiber optic that has a 30 year lifetime.

                        felix_eckhardt@det.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                          @felix_eckhardt @tante

                          The systems get more and more expensive. They may be more powerful, but they aren’t getting less expensive. They’re getting more expensive.

                          Given that the lifetime of the computational units is between one and three years before they burn out or become obsolete, the window of time they must recoup their cost and make a profit is tiny. This isn’t like laying fiber optic that has a 30 year lifetime.

                          felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                          felix_eckhardt@det.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @tante if we look at the last two or three years that might be correct. For the rest of history computational power got cheaper and cheaper. Currently we have a special situation, which will not last forever.

                          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tezoatlipoca@mas.toT tezoatlipoca@mas.to

                            @tante

                            This is fantastic and unfortunately true.

                            I am Sara, tunnelling under Mordor with a USB stick. I have attempted to document the cron job and institutionalize the periodic nudge it needs to run payroll... but then I get yelled at for not videcoding enough new featureslop. There are no juniors for me to explain the cron job too.

                            Perhaps the AI may one dayabsorb the wiki page about the cron job. Hopefully someone else thinks to ask the AI about why payroll didn't run.

                            darwinwoodka@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                            darwinwoodka@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                            darwinwoodka@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @tezoatlipoca @tante

                            There are no more spoons, we sold them all to pay for the AI

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • felix_eckhardt@det.socialF felix_eckhardt@det.social

                              @tante we might not need any human coder, when no senior is available anymore. It was similar with other professions.

                              nfoonf@chaos.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nfoonf@chaos.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nfoonf@chaos.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @felix_eckhardt @tante this is the same like saying there is no difference between a taylormade suit and 2$ underpants made by slave labor in Bangladesh.

                              felix_eckhardt@det.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • felix_eckhardt@det.socialF felix_eckhardt@det.social

                                @GhostOnTheHalfShell @tante if we look at the last two or three years that might be correct. For the rest of history computational power got cheaper and cheaper. Currently we have a special situation, which will not last forever.

                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @felix_eckhardt @tante

                                Even Moore’s law has flattened out because we’re reaching the physical limit of electronics. The only way compute power has really expanded is by stacking compute cells on top of each other.

                                The faster speeds dramatically increase. I think the relationship is a low exponentiation so more compute power faster speeds demands more and more power delivery and generates more and more heat. This is not a good combination.

                                felix_eckhardt@det.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • nfoonf@chaos.socialN nfoonf@chaos.social

                                  @felix_eckhardt @tante this is the same like saying there is no difference between a taylormade suit and 2$ underpants made by slave labor in Bangladesh.

                                  felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  felix_eckhardt@det.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  @Nfoonf @tante yeah, that's a fair comparison. Doesn't mean it isn't going to happen.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                    "There are no more juniors. There was a funeral for their passing in 2024. Nobody came. The machine does what they do now, but cheaper. Of course, juniors weren't valuable for what they produced, they were valuable for who they would become: the senior engineer who knows where the bodies are buried. We optimized for output, and abolished apprenticeship. A few years from now, we'll wonder where all the seniors are. We shot them. Nobody will remember."

                                    Programming Still Sucks. — Writing

                                    Sorry Peter. — I'm at a birthday party, and while most people here also work in tech, there's always a Guy with a Real Job. You know, a physical job, building some or other thing people need. And this Guy always asks some variant of the same question: aren't you worried AI is taking your job? I glance around and see a few faces turning around toward us, rolling their eyes ever so slightly before returning to their previous conversation. Yes, this question again.

                                    favicon

                                    (www.stvn.sh)

                                    tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tuban_muzuru@beige.party
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    @tante

                                    There will be a place for juniors, I believe. Jevon's Paradox

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • felix_eckhardt@det.socialF felix_eckhardt@det.social

                                      @tante we might not need any human coder, when no senior is available anymore. It was similar with other professions.

                                      toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      toriver@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      toriver@mas.to
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @felix_eckhardt @tante Yup, no one becomes cooks any more after we got microwave meals in the freezer section. Why bother?

                                      felix_eckhardt@det.socialF soundasleep@mastodon.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • toriver@mas.toT toriver@mas.to

                                        @felix_eckhardt @tante Yup, no one becomes cooks any more after we got microwave meals in the freezer section. Why bother?

                                        felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        felix_eckhardt@det.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        felix_eckhardt@det.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @toriver @tante I would compare this to the job of a weaver. The waevers became machine assistants and at some point the job just disappeared. Not saying this is a good thing or makes the world a better place. But i see the possibility that this will happen.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                          "There are no more juniors. There was a funeral for their passing in 2024. Nobody came. The machine does what they do now, but cheaper. Of course, juniors weren't valuable for what they produced, they were valuable for who they would become: the senior engineer who knows where the bodies are buried. We optimized for output, and abolished apprenticeship. A few years from now, we'll wonder where all the seniors are. We shot them. Nobody will remember."

                                          Programming Still Sucks. — Writing

                                          Sorry Peter. — I'm at a birthday party, and while most people here also work in tech, there's always a Guy with a Real Job. You know, a physical job, building some or other thing people need. And this Guy always asks some variant of the same question: aren't you worried AI is taking your job? I glance around and see a few faces turning around toward us, rolling their eyes ever so slightly before returning to their previous conversation. Yes, this question again.

                                          favicon

                                          (www.stvn.sh)

                                          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #30

                                          @tante

                                          “Cheaper” only because the industry is currently subsidizing subscriptions to the tune of 5 to 12 times the revenue they gain from the subscriptions themselves.

                                          And we haven’t even started to talk about the debt service these companies have undertaken

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups