Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool!

Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
radioactivity
5 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
    ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
    ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool!

    BBC: The eerie abandoned vehicles in Chernobyl's 'dead zone'

    https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260424-the-eerie-abandoned-vehicles-in-chernobyls-dead-zone

    #radioactivity

    ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org

      Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool!

      BBC: The eerie abandoned vehicles in Chernobyl's 'dead zone'

      https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260424-the-eerie-abandoned-vehicles-in-chernobyls-dead-zone

      #radioactivity

      ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
      ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
      ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      I don't dare ask the Nuclear Reactors Are Very Safe We Need To Build Thousands More To Stop Climate Change people about the whole Chornobyl thing, lol

      (apparently "radioactivity is good for you, there's no problem with radioactivity exposure" was one of them on one of the nukes-for-all-reply-guys last time 😂 )

      pixelpusher220@dmv.communityP futuristicrobert@infosec.exchangeF 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org

        I don't dare ask the Nuclear Reactors Are Very Safe We Need To Build Thousands More To Stop Climate Change people about the whole Chornobyl thing, lol

        (apparently "radioactivity is good for you, there's no problem with radioactivity exposure" was one of them on one of the nukes-for-all-reply-guys last time 😂 )

        pixelpusher220@dmv.communityP This user is from outside of this forum
        pixelpusher220@dmv.communityP This user is from outside of this forum
        pixelpusher220@dmv.community
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @ai6yr

        The one nuclear I would tolerate would be the molten salt reactors.

        Not so much that it's safer, but that it can literally eat our current waste as fuel.

        futuristicrobert@infosec.exchangeF 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org

          I don't dare ask the Nuclear Reactors Are Very Safe We Need To Build Thousands More To Stop Climate Change people about the whole Chornobyl thing, lol

          (apparently "radioactivity is good for you, there's no problem with radioactivity exposure" was one of them on one of the nukes-for-all-reply-guys last time 😂 )

          futuristicrobert@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
          futuristicrobert@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
          futuristicrobert@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @ai6yr I do think nuclear reactors as part of a clean energy strategy is worth consideration, and that there are safe designs to consider. But thousands? lol.

          We’ve come so far with wind, solar, and battery design that nuclear isn’t something we would ever need to depend upon full tilt.

          I’m sure the radioactivity is good for you reply-guys didn’t get the vaccine because “that which doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
            R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
          • pixelpusher220@dmv.communityP pixelpusher220@dmv.community

            @ai6yr

            The one nuclear I would tolerate would be the molten salt reactors.

            Not so much that it's safer, but that it can literally eat our current waste as fuel.

            futuristicrobert@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
            futuristicrobert@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
            futuristicrobert@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @pixelpusher220 @ai6yr

            It has a long way to go. I’m excited about the prospect but there’s a huge set of hills that the people working on it need to climb.

            https://thebulletin.org/2022/06/molten-salt-reactors-were-trouble-in-the-1960s-and-they-remain-trouble-today/

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups