<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool!</p><p>BBC: The eerie abandoned vehicles in Chernobyl's 'dead zone'</p><p></p><div class="card col-md-9 col-lg-6 position-relative link-preview p-0">



<a href="https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260424-the-eerie-abandoned-vehicles-in-chernobyls-dead-zone" title="The eerie abandoned vehicles in Chernobyl's 'dead zone'">
<img src="https://ychef.files.bbci.co.uk/624x351/p0ngf56q.jpg" class="card-img-top not-responsive" style="max-height:15rem" alt="Link Preview Image" />
</a>



<div class="card-body">
<h5 class="card-title">
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260424-the-eerie-abandoned-vehicles-in-chernobyls-dead-zone">
The eerie abandoned vehicles in Chernobyl's 'dead zone'
</a>
</h5>
<p class="card-text line-clamp-3">A huge armada of vehicles were used to clean-up the radioactive aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster 40 years ago. Many of them still lie rusting inside the exclusion zone.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260424-the-eerie-abandoned-vehicles-in-chernobyls-dead-zone" class="card-footer text-body-secondary small d-flex gap-2 align-items-center lh-2">



<img src="https://static.files.bbci.co.uk/bbcdotcom/web/20260506-094152-fab693f842-web-3.4.0-2/favicon-32x32.png" alt="favicon" class="not-responsive overflow-hiddden" style="max-width:21px;max-height:21px" />







<p class="d-inline-block text-truncate mb-0"> <span class="text-secondary">(www.bbc.com)</span></p>
</a>
</div><p></p><p><a href="https://m.ai6yr.org/tags/radioactivity" rel="tag">#<span>radioactivity</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/05a89927-6702-434b-9a21-177d18b52379/ooh-i-want-a-radioactive-abandoned-soviet-helicopter-that-would-be-cool</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 05:06:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/05a89927-6702-434b-9a21-177d18b52379.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:17:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool! on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 20:03:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/pixelpusher220%40dmv.community">@<span>pixelpusher220</span></a></span> <span><a href="/user/ai6yr%40m.ai6yr.org">@<span>ai6yr</span></a></span> </p><p>It has a long way to go. I’m excited about the prospect but there’s a huge set of hills that the people working on it need to climb. </p><p></p><div class="card col-md-9 col-lg-6 position-relative link-preview p-0">



<a href="https://thebulletin.org/2022/06/molten-salt-reactors-were-trouble-in-the-1960s-and-they-remain-trouble-today/" title="Molten salt reactors were trouble in the 1960s—and they remain trouble today">
<img src="https://thebulletin.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/21573648474_67915c03aa_c.jpg.optimal.jpg" class="card-img-top not-responsive" style="max-height:15rem" alt="Link Preview Image" />
</a>



<div class="card-body">
<h5 class="card-title">
<a href="https://thebulletin.org/2022/06/molten-salt-reactors-were-trouble-in-the-1960s-and-they-remain-trouble-today/">
Molten salt reactors were trouble in the 1960s—and they remain trouble today
</a>
</h5>
<p class="card-text line-clamp-3">Molten salt nuclear reactors—based on a 1960s Oak Ridge National Lab experiment—are all the rage among some nuclear power enthusiasts. But is that experiment worthy of emulation? Perhaps not.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://thebulletin.org/2022/06/molten-salt-reactors-were-trouble-in-the-1960s-and-they-remain-trouble-today/" class="card-footer text-body-secondary small d-flex gap-2 align-items-center lh-2">



<img src="https://thebulletin.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/cropped-Favicon-Bulletin-BW-Rounded-512x512-1-32x32.png" alt="favicon" class="not-responsive overflow-hiddden" style="max-width:21px;max-height:21px" />







<p class="d-inline-block text-truncate mb-0">Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists <span class="text-secondary">(thebulletin.org)</span></p>
</a>
</div><p></p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/115833042784456710/statuses/116467133691348417</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/115833042784456710/statuses/116467133691348417</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[futuristicrobert@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 20:03:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool! on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:54:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/ai6yr%40m.ai6yr.org">@<span>ai6yr</span></a></span> I do think nuclear reactors as part of a clean energy strategy is worth consideration, and that there are safe designs to consider. But thousands? lol. </p><p>We’ve come so far with wind, solar, and battery design that nuclear isn’t something we would ever need to depend upon full tilt. </p><p>I’m sure the radioactivity is good for you reply-guys didn’t get the vaccine because “that which doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.”</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/115833042784456710/statuses/116467095642013915</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://infosec.exchange/ap/users/115833042784456710/statuses/116467095642013915</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[futuristicrobert@infosec.exchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:54:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool! on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:38:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="/user/ai6yr%40m.ai6yr.org">@<span>ai6yr</span></a></span> </p><p>The one nuclear I would tolerate would be the molten salt reactors.</p><p>Not so much that it's safer, but that it can literally eat our current waste as fuel.</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://dmv.community/users/pixelpusher220/statuses/116467035343639604</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://dmv.community/users/pixelpusher220/statuses/116467035343639604</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pixelpusher220@dmv.community]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:38:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ooh, I want a radioactive abandoned Soviet helicopter, that would be cool! on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:21:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I don't dare ask the Nuclear Reactors Are Very Safe We Need To Build Thousands More To Stop Climate Change people about the whole Chornobyl thing, lol </p><p>(apparently "radioactivity is good for you, there's no problem with radioactivity exposure" was one of them on one of the nukes-for-all-reply-guys last time <img src="https://board.circlewithadot.net/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f602.png?v=28325c671da" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--joy" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="😂" alt="😂" /> )</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://m.ai6yr.org/users/ai6yr/statuses/116466967304520920</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://m.ai6yr.org/users/ai6yr/statuses/116466967304520920</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:21:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>