Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
50 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB bob_zim@infosec.exchange

    @agowa338 Cards like that exist, but they don’t hold thousands of DIMMs.

    agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    agowa338@chaos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    @bob_zim But PCIe lane splitters and extenders also exist. And I don't know what the highest archivable density of these cards currently is.

    I so far have only had one old one in my hands and seen them in slides in class at my job training about 10 years ago (they were mentioned as accelerator cards primarily used for things like MS Dynamics and SAP databases)...

    bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • agowa338@chaos.socialA agowa338@chaos.social

      @GerardThornley @cursedsql @bob_zim @SecurityWriter

      Or you want to place it in an environment where it has to deal with heavy vibrations. Like on a moving trolly or in a vehicle or ... there are multiple reasons for this. It may even just be because you need high random IO speeds...

      And the sizing also depends on what you're using it for. Like e.g. if you get your data in to the system in infrequent busts but at multiple TB/s and you've to cache it until it is synced even to SSDs, well

      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      gerardthornley@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      @agowa338 @cursedsql @bob_zim @SecurityWriter Yep, those are also possibilities. I described what I think is most probable given the information available and scenarios I've seen, but yeah, there are reasons it might be a less typical setup, or my knowledge might be out of date.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • agowa338@chaos.socialA agowa338@chaos.social

        @GerardThornley @cursedsql @bob_zim @SecurityWriter

        (The later was an example from scientific environments. I think it was CERN but I'm not sure...)

        G This user is from outside of this forum
        G This user is from outside of this forum
        gerardthornley@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        @agowa338 @cursedsql @bob_zim @SecurityWriter Yeah, that's sounds pretty plausible for things like the LHC experiments.

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G gerardthornley@hachyderm.io

          @agowa338 @cursedsql @bob_zim @SecurityWriter Yeah, that's sounds pretty plausible for things like the LHC experiments.

          G This user is from outside of this forum
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          gerardthornley@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          @agowa338 @cursedsql @bob_zim @SecurityWriter For the vehicle scenario, I know modern trains have a lot of sensors on, and I don't know the sampling rate, but they do only have short windows to upload the data they're in their terminal station. I'm not sure I can believe them needing TBs, though.
          On the other hand, a F1 team would probably combine transport (though presumably powered down) with need for high bandwidth and low latency. 🙂

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • agowa338@chaos.socialA agowa338@chaos.social

            @bob_zim But PCIe lane splitters and extenders also exist. And I don't know what the highest archivable density of these cards currently is.

            I so far have only had one old one in my hands and seen them in slides in class at my job training about 10 years ago (they were mentioned as accelerator cards primarily used for things like MS Dynamics and SAP databases)...

            bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
            bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
            bob_zim@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            @agowa338 It’s more about the physical space for the cards. Most hold eight DIMMs. Holding 3072 would take 384 cards. That’s nearly a full rack just for the RAM cards, not counting the persistent drives. No way would you run that with even two entire blade frames, let alone two blades.

            agowa338@chaos.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB bob_zim@infosec.exchange

              @agowa338 It’s more about the physical space for the cards. Most hold eight DIMMs. Holding 3072 would take 384 cards. That’s nearly a full rack just for the RAM cards, not counting the persistent drives. No way would you run that with even two entire blade frames, let alone two blades.

              agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              agowa338@chaos.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              agowa338@chaos.social
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              @bob_zim

              Hmm true. Makes it quite unlikely.

              However I want to push back on one thing. It would still be theoretically possible, as PCIe fabrics and such also exist.

              But yea, probably not then. I didn't do the math for the space requirements....

              bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • stekopf@mstdn.socialS stekopf@mstdn.social

                @thechris @SecurityWriter

                Don't forget to mention AI ☝️

                thechris@norden.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                thechris@norden.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                thechris@norden.social
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                @stekopf @SecurityWriter I don't think you have to, it's all they can think of anyway nowadays

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                  I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                  It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                  I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                  Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                  And I will.

                  sn@mastodon.ping.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sn@mastodon.ping.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sn@mastodon.ping.de
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  @SecurityWriter 384TB of RAM is a lot. Perhaps you meant GB?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • moppi@chaos.socialM moppi@chaos.social

                    @SecurityWriter

                    Don't Breath Fire !!!! you evil dragon !!!

                    malachai@furry.engineerM This user is from outside of this forum
                    malachai@furry.engineerM This user is from outside of this forum
                    malachai@furry.engineer
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    @moppi @SecurityWriter we're not all like that

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • agowa338@chaos.socialA agowa338@chaos.social

                      @bob_zim

                      Hmm true. Makes it quite unlikely.

                      However I want to push back on one thing. It would still be theoretically possible, as PCIe fabrics and such also exist.

                      But yea, probably not then. I didn't do the math for the space requirements....

                      bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bob_zim@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      @agowa338 Also worth noting 128 GB DDR4 DIMMs are almost universally “load-reduced”, or LR-DIMMs. Those have significantly higher latency than normally expected from RAM, though still lower than persistent storage. For low-latency RAM, you’re generally limited to 64 GB per DIMM, so double everything.

                      Then you have the PCIe cabling. Each card needs at least two dedicated lanes, otherwise contention wrecks your latency and you may as well use flash. That’s 768 or 1536 twinax bundles.

                      Lots of RAM is possible, but it takes *bonkers* amounts of space and some very exotic hardware.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                        I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                        It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                        I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                        Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                        And I will.

                        maitre@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                        maitre@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                        maitre@mastodon.online
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        @SecurityWriter I never thought about quantifying the perching potential of my computer hardware ...

                        I have a physical treasure trove, of a sort!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                          I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                          It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                          I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                          Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                          And I will.

                          nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                          wrote last edited by
                          #43

                          @SecurityWriter I'm not gonna lie, I'm a little turned on.....

                          More than a little even.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                            I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                            It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                            I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                            Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                            And I will.

                            oldsysops@social.dk-libre.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oldsysops@social.dk-libre.frO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oldsysops@social.dk-libre.fr
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44
                            @SecurityWriter@infosec.exchange king of the ram
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                              I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                              It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                              I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                              Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                              And I will.

                              madduci@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              madduci@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              madduci@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              @SecurityWriter you can empower the Fediverse with that

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                                I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                                It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                                I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                                Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                                And I will.

                                securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                securitywriter@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                Duhhhh I’ve been at work all day and noticed my dumb typo.

                                GB not TB.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • agowa338@chaos.socialA agowa338@chaos.social

                                  @SecurityWriter

                                  How did you get 384TB of ECC DDR4 memory connected to only 4 CPUs?

                                  Do you really mean TB and not GB????

                                  securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  securitywriter@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47

                                  @agowa338 with the power of typos! They’re old units. Don’t think it even supports TB plus.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                                    Duhhhh I’ve been at work all day and noticed my dumb typo.

                                    GB not TB.

                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    lyceris@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48

                                    @SecurityWriter Awww.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                                      I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                                      It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                                      I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                                      Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                                      And I will.

                                      ericcarroll@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ericcarroll@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ericcarroll@cosocial.ca
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      @SecurityWriter
                                      I liked it better with TB.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                                        I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                                        It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                                        I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                                        Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                                        And I will.

                                        masek@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        masek@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        masek@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #50

                                        @SecurityWriter I am selling my old NAS and hope to finance a small castle in south france with it.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        0
                                        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups