Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
50 Posts 29 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • agowa338@chaos.socialA agowa338@chaos.social

    @bob_zim

    Hmm true. Makes it quite unlikely.

    However I want to push back on one thing. It would still be theoretically possible, as PCIe fabrics and such also exist.

    But yea, probably not then. I didn't do the math for the space requirements....

    bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    bob_zim@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
    bob_zim@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #41

    @agowa338 Also worth noting 128 GB DDR4 DIMMs are almost universally “load-reduced”, or LR-DIMMs. Those have significantly higher latency than normally expected from RAM, though still lower than persistent storage. For low-latency RAM, you’re generally limited to 64 GB per DIMM, so double everything.

    Then you have the PCIe cabling. Each card needs at least two dedicated lanes, otherwise contention wrecks your latency and you may as well use flash. That’s 768 or 1536 twinax bundles.

    Lots of RAM is possible, but it takes *bonkers* amounts of space and some very exotic hardware.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

      I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

      It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

      I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

      Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

      And I will.

      maitre@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      maitre@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      maitre@mastodon.online
      wrote last edited by
      #42

      @SecurityWriter I never thought about quantifying the perching potential of my computer hardware ...

      I have a physical treasure trove, of a sort!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

        I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

        It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

        I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

        Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

        And I will.

        nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
        nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafeN This user is from outside of this forum
        nuintari@mastodon.bsd.cafe
        wrote last edited by
        #43

        @SecurityWriter I'm not gonna lie, I'm a little turned on.....

        More than a little even.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

          I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

          It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

          I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

          Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

          And I will.

          oldsysops@social.dk-libre.frO This user is from outside of this forum
          oldsysops@social.dk-libre.frO This user is from outside of this forum
          oldsysops@social.dk-libre.fr
          wrote last edited by
          #44
          @SecurityWriter@infosec.exchange king of the ram
          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

            I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

            It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

            I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

            Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

            And I will.

            madduci@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            madduci@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            madduci@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #45

            @SecurityWriter you can empower the Fediverse with that

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

              I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

              It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

              I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

              Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

              And I will.

              securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
              securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
              securitywriter@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #46

              Duhhhh I’ve been at work all day and noticed my dumb typo.

              GB not TB.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • agowa338@chaos.socialA agowa338@chaos.social

                @SecurityWriter

                How did you get 384TB of ECC DDR4 memory connected to only 4 CPUs?

                Do you really mean TB and not GB????

                securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                securitywriter@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #47

                @agowa338 with the power of typos! They’re old units. Don’t think it even supports TB plus.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                  Duhhhh I’ve been at work all day and noticed my dumb typo.

                  GB not TB.

                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  L This user is from outside of this forum
                  lyceris@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #48

                  @SecurityWriter Awww.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                    I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                    It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                    I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                    Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                    And I will.

                    ericcarroll@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                    ericcarroll@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                    ericcarroll@cosocial.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #49

                    @SecurityWriter
                    I liked it better with TB.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchange

                      I have 384TB of ECC DDR4 across two blades with 4 CPUs for a combined core count of 96.

                      It powers a fully populated 192 disk solid state SAN.

                      I was told it was old and in need of replacing, but apparently now it’s worth more than the GDP of the UK.

                      Can’t afford to run it (or hear my thoughts when in the vicinity)… but I can sit atop it like a fucking dragon.

                      And I will.

                      masek@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      masek@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      masek@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #50

                      @SecurityWriter I am selling my old NAS and hope to finance a small castle in south france with it.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups