Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. No one: Absolutely no one: Not one single solitary person:

No one: Absolutely no one: Not one single solitary person:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
11 Posts 6 Posters 19 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

    No one:
    Absolutely no one:
    Not one single solitary person:

    Some techie: well actually I use AI and its fine because i recognize there are social and environmental costs that im downplaying, plus im built different so I can't be misled by them so its fine actually

    jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    Look. If you think these things are just neutral tools, to be used how and when they suit you, then just do that. Why do feel the need to defend and justify using them?

    (Again, I know why, this is rhetorical)

    jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

      No one:
      Absolutely no one:
      Not one single solitary person:

      Some techie: well actually I use AI and its fine because i recognize there are social and environmental costs that im downplaying, plus im built different so I can't be misled by them so its fine actually

      defractal@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
      defractal@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
      defractal@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @jenniferplusplus Those who are most certain they're immune to the cognitive harms of protracted faux-discussion with an #LLM are much like those who are most certain they can never be taken in by a cult, an extremist group, or a long-con fraud.

      The more certain you are that it can't happen to you, the more susceptible you are, because of that certainty.

      bms48@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • defractal@infosec.exchangeD defractal@infosec.exchange

        @jenniferplusplus Those who are most certain they're immune to the cognitive harms of protracted faux-discussion with an #LLM are much like those who are most certain they can never be taken in by a cult, an extremist group, or a long-con fraud.

        The more certain you are that it can't happen to you, the more susceptible you are, because of that certainty.

        bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bms48@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @deFractal @jenniferplusplus +1. Confirmation bias works both ways........ that is what is so dangerous about this stuff. If you know you're interacting with one, it's much easier. But if you don't... demons form.

        defractal@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • bms48@mastodon.socialB bms48@mastodon.social

          @deFractal @jenniferplusplus +1. Confirmation bias works both ways........ that is what is so dangerous about this stuff. If you know you're interacting with one, it's much easier. But if you don't... demons form.

          defractal@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
          defractal@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
          defractal@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @bms48 @jenniferplusplus Even if you know what you're interacting with: cognitive atrophy is an inevitable result of cognitive outsourcing. The brain, like the muscles and skeleton, is a use-it-or-lose-it system. The body recycles tissue which is disused.

          Astronauts know full well the atrophy which results from weightlessness, and some occurs even despite the deliberate work they put into its mitigation.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @hipsterelectron 🧠 can't get colonized if I'm doing the colonizing

            *touches ear piece*

            I'm being informed this is not true

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

              Look. If you think these things are just neutral tools, to be used how and when they suit you, then just do that. Why do feel the need to defend and justify using them?

              (Again, I know why, this is rhetorical)

              jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              Oh, and if you think these things are powerful but dangerous tools, only to be used with care by specially qualified people, why the _fuck_ are you recruiting for them?!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                No one:
                Absolutely no one:
                Not one single solitary person:

                Some techie: well actually I use AI and its fine because i recognize there are social and environmental costs that im downplaying, plus im built different so I can't be misled by them so its fine actually

                jlou@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jlou@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jlou@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @jenniferplusplus Are there any arguments against using voice models for privacy?

                jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jlou@mastodon.socialJ jlou@mastodon.social

                  @jenniferplusplus Are there any arguments against using voice models for privacy?

                  jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @jlou I'm not the person, and this is not the post, for you to try "but my use case is special"

                  You don't need my blessing. Insisting that you get it anyway is not helping anything

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                    No one:
                    Absolutely no one:
                    Not one single solitary person:

                    Some techie: well actually I use AI and its fine because i recognize there are social and environmental costs that im downplaying, plus im built different so I can't be misled by them so its fine actually

                    claus@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                    claus@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                    claus@hachyderm.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @jenniferplusplus I've had people argue to me that "yes, there's social, environmental, economical, etc costs now, but if we keep using AI it's going to put pressure on someone to come up with a solution to everything."

                    These are the kind of people that look at the narcissist's prayer and think "yeah, that seems like a good plan!"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.ioJ jenniferplusplus@hachyderm.io

                      No one:
                      Absolutely no one:
                      Not one single solitary person:

                      Some techie: well actually I use AI and its fine because i recognize there are social and environmental costs that im downplaying, plus im built different so I can't be misled by them so its fine actually

                      vikxin@beach.cityV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vikxin@beach.cityV This user is from outside of this forum
                      vikxin@beach.city
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @jenniferplusplus seen this too many times

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups