Vim's lead maintainer has fully lost his goddamn mind
-
@KatS @barubary @AndrewRadev don't switch yet. GNU is still discussing whether to allow LLM vomitted code contributions. Them of all projects not rejecting it on ideological grounds and some emacs manitainers seemingly liking LLMs is not a good sign though.
I will be MAD if I have to abandon emacs because of this shit
@lhp @KatS @barubary @AndrewRadev Oh if they ensloppify emacs I will be on the evening news.
-
@dirtside why?
-
Vim's lead maintainer has fully lost his goddamn mind
-
@penny @dirtside maybe we can go straight to basics: I'll start by saying I don't believe in copyright. I know it's necessary in today's world, but I'm personally opposed to it. I think it's a true reflection of capitalism and this world is much more worse off because of it than without.
Regarding AI, I believe there's a distinction between the theoretical technology and the current companies that deploy popular models. As well as downstream effects caused by them.
-
@penny @dirtside maybe we can go straight to basics: I'll start by saying I don't believe in copyright. I know it's necessary in today's world, but I'm personally opposed to it. I think it's a true reflection of capitalism and this world is much more worse off because of it than without.
Regarding AI, I believe there's a distinction between the theoretical technology and the current companies that deploy popular models. As well as downstream effects caused by them.
@penny @dirtside to add: I personally try to fight AI slop myself https://github.com/eljojo/no-autopilot
-
@f4grx @AndrewRadev I have a radical opinion that every over 45 should be provided an apartment, a latest game console with a subscription, and a lifetime food and beer supply, and banned from working. For exactly this reason.
@remove_huilo take your ageism and put it where the sun doesn't reach @f4grx @AndrewRadev
-
@penny @dirtside maybe we can go straight to basics: I'll start by saying I don't believe in copyright. I know it's necessary in today's world, but I'm personally opposed to it. I think it's a true reflection of capitalism and this world is much more worse off because of it than without.
Regarding AI, I believe there's a distinction between the theoretical technology and the current companies that deploy popular models. As well as downstream effects caused by them.
@eljojo @dirtside I don’t either, but here, I will give you a copypaste of my most recent spiel and then politely, I will block you when I believe it’s been received because I don’t really want to know you at this time
it’s all stolen but I don’t even care about copyright, it’s an existential threat to the internet and to society that is funded by billionaires who hate us
It exists only to cause harm and if you get anything out of it you are only enabling and reaping that harm
I also think by the nature of information theory llms can only digest information and lower the entropy floor- anything they output is worse than what they ingested, anything they remove is destroyed
-
Vim's lead maintainer has fully lost his goddamn mind
@AndrewRadev holy fucking shit not vim
-
@eljojo @dirtside I don’t either, but here, I will give you a copypaste of my most recent spiel and then politely, I will block you when I believe it’s been received because I don’t really want to know you at this time
it’s all stolen but I don’t even care about copyright, it’s an existential threat to the internet and to society that is funded by billionaires who hate us
It exists only to cause harm and if you get anything out of it you are only enabling and reaping that harm
I also think by the nature of information theory llms can only digest information and lower the entropy floor- anything they output is worse than what they ingested, anything they remove is destroyed
-
Vim's lead maintainer has fully lost his goddamn mind
@AndrewRadev not sure how bram would feel about this if he were still around, god rest his soul
-
@lhp @KatS @barubary @AndrewRadev Oh if they ensloppify emacs I will be on the evening news.
@theorangetheme @KatS @barubary @AndrewRadev I do wonder if it would make sense to mail rms and ask him to not allow it? I can't stand the guy, at all, he held free software back by decades by being <we all know what he is>, but he has veto powers in GNU and might be swayed my moral arguments...
-
Vim's lead maintainer has fully lost his goddamn mind
It feels like Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
One of these days I'll go to a conference and mention that I don't use AI and the whole room will go silent with everyone's mouth in a wide "O" pointing at me.
Yeah, I'm talking about the 1978 version, which seems even more appropriate. You could make endless memes from scenes of that film. https://archive.org/details/Popcornarchive-invasionOfTheBodySnatchers1978#
-
Vim's lead maintainer has fully lost his goddamn mind
@AndrewRadev the thing is, if you ask AI to find issues in the PR, it would find issues, whenever they're insane, impossible or irrelevant.
-
Vim's lead maintainer has fully lost his goddamn mind
-
@kunev "There, I fixed it"
Monkey’s paw closes
-
This is in a PR where Shougo, another long-time contributor, communicates entirely in walls of unparseable AI slop text: https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/19413
What a pathetic state after decades of active, thoughtful work. "I asked the chatbot how to write this code", "Well, I asked my chatbot, and "he" doesn't like it". What a fucking embarrassment.
> He is responsible for reviewing and making calls on every single issue and PR. While other members do help, we are severely understaffed. Using AI to streamline this overwhelming workload is a practical necessity
Gosh, I'd love to know what Bram would say to this comment in particular.
-
@KatS @barubary @AndrewRadev don't switch yet. GNU is still discussing whether to allow LLM vomitted code contributions. Them of all projects not rejecting it on ideological grounds and some emacs manitainers seemingly liking LLMs is not a good sign though.
I will be MAD if I have to abandon emacs because of this shit
-
@AndrewRadev feeling reaffirmed in my stance that AI is also a wake-up call to society as a whole—because this so-called AI can only do bullshit formalities and soulless reproduction of expected patterns without doing any real work or any real thinking, whatever job AI can take is 100% a bullshit job that shouldn’t exist in the first place
i feel like this is yanking at some very fundamental systems interwoven in the social fabric, and i’m not sure peopla quite realize the extent of it yet; the repercussions, should it all unravel—which might just happen. the constantly accelerating propagation and increasing information density of communication, and now this technology, seem to me like they’re heralding a sort of collective awakening that perfectly coincides with the decline of the last generations that did not grow up cultivating unprecedented mental flexibility in a rapidly, drastically and unpredictably changing world viewed through the kaleidoscope peephole of the internet. a point in time where we all begin to realize and seriously ask ourselves, “what if we just stopped doing things the way our ancestors did, and reevaluated everything they consider normal? should we let the living organism that is our society be governed by the principles of people who worry about the decline in alcohol and tobacco consumption, or are they a malignant growth that needs to be excised?”
because to me, what this AI does and how it fits into the world, and how it reaches into almost every corner of an average person’s life, just highlights the hypernormal fakeness that permeates everything in our tech-infused modern lifestyle full of abstractions and bureaucracy that keep us from engaging with the real world. i’m starting to think that everyone seemingly having worse ADHD/ASD symptoms than ever is no coincidence either, because deep down we realize that the world in our minds, the one we engage with as a proxy for what is real, is an unrewarding vacuum thirsting for meaning—and being deprived of healthy bonds, closeness and intimacy also means being deprived of things that are absolutely essential for brain development.
how is it that the world is so vivid and full of life, yet so dead and bleak in our minds that we constantly have to surround ourselves with artificial stimuli to keep us occupied with abstractions, afterimages, fantasies and worries about things we collectively made up? how did we all get traumatized and brainwashed so badly we lost our sense of wonder and appreciation for the life that surrounds us, and replaced the warmth in our everyday encounters, that thing we absolutely need for our mental wellbeing, with touchscreens, self-service terminals and machines that show us only what we want to see? why choose to live in concrete jungles where no matter where you go, something tries to drill into your skull to make you want to consume more of the fakeness? or in suburbs where we’re horribly alone with nothing to do and no one to meet?@mia preach! Thank you. @AndrewRadev
-
@KatS @lhp @barubary @AndrewRadev
Well frack, where do I take my text editing needs now? Which vi/vim variant hasn't been infected with this slop?
Or do I just go back to vi? I'll miss syntax highlighting and multi-staged undo, but don't really use any other vim features.
-
@simon_brooke @AndrewRadev i am not a native English speaker either but i am perfectly capable of thinking
