Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics.

Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
89 Posts 35 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    RE: https://infosec.exchange/@bontchev/116271481696841313

    Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics. The supply chain shock will get as bad as 2022 within a couple of months—then keep getting worse.

    isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
    isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
    isaackuo@spacey.space
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @cstross Trump and the people around him are absolute morons, yes, but there is a weird motivated thinking desire among many to breathlessly claim US military hardware - which Trump had no hand in the development of - somehow sucks.

    The F-35, for all its infamous flaws, is working better than experts expected. It was never designed to be fully stealthy - it emits radar so it can see and shoot at enemy aircraft.

    And SM-3 continues to be phenomenal.

    But the awesome performance of some systems

    isaackuo@spacey.spaceI nohatcoder@mastodon.gamedev.placeN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • isaackuo@spacey.spaceI isaackuo@spacey.space

      @cstross Trump and the people around him are absolute morons, yes, but there is a weird motivated thinking desire among many to breathlessly claim US military hardware - which Trump had no hand in the development of - somehow sucks.

      The F-35, for all its infamous flaws, is working better than experts expected. It was never designed to be fully stealthy - it emits radar so it can see and shoot at enemy aircraft.

      And SM-3 continues to be phenomenal.

      But the awesome performance of some systems

      isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
      isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
      isaackuo@spacey.space
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @cstross really does not change the fact that there never was any way to "win" this Iran War. You just have to look at this size, terrain, population layout of Iran compared to Iraq 2003 to get an idea of what sort of invasion force would have been necessary.

      And there aren't any neighbors to Iran eager to become an invasion staging area.

      So ... Iran will win. Period. They'll get bombed and stuff, and then ... they'll win.

      cstross@wandering.shopC graydon@canada.masto.hostG 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

        RE: https://infosec.exchange/@bontchev/116271481696841313

        Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics. The supply chain shock will get as bad as 2022 within a couple of months—then keep getting worse.

        rickf@indieweb.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        rickf@indieweb.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        rickf@indieweb.social
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @cstross Excellent and pithy analysis.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • isaackuo@spacey.spaceI isaackuo@spacey.space

          @cstross really does not change the fact that there never was any way to "win" this Iran War. You just have to look at this size, terrain, population layout of Iran compared to Iraq 2003 to get an idea of what sort of invasion force would have been necessary.

          And there aren't any neighbors to Iran eager to become an invasion staging area.

          So ... Iran will win. Period. They'll get bombed and stuff, and then ... they'll win.

          cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
          cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
          cstross@wandering.shop
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @isaackuo Yep.

          For people who've never looked at a map (most Americans, apparently), my synopsis is, "Iran is Mordor". Big-ass empire surrounded on all sides by water or mountains. Also, it's on the other side of the world from the USA. Also-also, the littoral approaches are all naval death-traps. There's a REASON the Persian Empire didn't get conquered very often, and it's geopolitics!

          blotosmetek@circumstances.runB green_bens@mastodon.greenG jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE etchedpixels@mastodon.social

            @rpluim @cstross already happening in some countries, and if Trump targets Iranian energy then I imagine that the response probably ends up even worse.
            And Iran hasn't even started on non conventional warfare like flying smuggled in drones into US refineries, data centres or world cup stadia

            Israel has the world's best air defence and it can't keep their missiles out.

            rpluim@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            rpluim@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
            rpluim@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @etchedpixels @cstross The worst case I've seen suggested is Iran setting off a dirty bomb in an important population centre (do they have any plutonium?), thus rendering it uninhabitable for centuries. Somewhere like Manhattan or the City would be awful

            etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE leeloo@c.imL 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              RE: https://infosec.exchange/@bontchev/116271481696841313

              Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics. The supply chain shock will get as bad as 2022 within a couple of months—then keep getting worse.

              mjj@mstdn.dkM This user is from outside of this forum
              mjj@mstdn.dkM This user is from outside of this forum
              mjj@mstdn.dk
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @cstross "This is a clusterfuck of historic proportions and everyone who's ever held a rank knows it" - well then

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                @isaackuo Yep.

                For people who've never looked at a map (most Americans, apparently), my synopsis is, "Iran is Mordor". Big-ass empire surrounded on all sides by water or mountains. Also, it's on the other side of the world from the USA. Also-also, the littoral approaches are all naval death-traps. There's a REASON the Persian Empire didn't get conquered very often, and it's geopolitics!

                blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
                blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
                blotosmetek@circumstances.run
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                @cstross @isaackuo A couple of days ago I saw someone claiming that it is closer (in straight line) from Poland to Iran than from the NW corner of Iran to the SE corner. Turns out it's true - the latter distance is ~2270 km, while the former is only ~2000 km.

                caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC rootwyrm@weird.autosR blotosmetek@circumstances.runB 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

                  @cstross @isaackuo A couple of days ago I saw someone claiming that it is closer (in straight line) from Poland to Iran than from the NW corner of Iran to the SE corner. Turns out it's true - the latter distance is ~2270 km, while the former is only ~2000 km.

                  caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC This user is from outside of this forum
                  caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC This user is from outside of this forum
                  caesarologia@masto.donte.com.br
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @blotosmetek @cstross @isaackuo translating to US English for USonian audiences: Iran is like the Texas of the Middle East.

                  blotosmetek@circumstances.runB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC caesarologia@masto.donte.com.br

                    @blotosmetek @cstross @isaackuo translating to US English for USonian audiences: Iran is like the Texas of the Middle East.

                    blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
                    blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
                    blotosmetek@circumstances.run
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    @caesarologia @cstross @isaackuo Actually, Iran is about 2.5 times bigger than Texax, with land area 1 648 195 km² vs 676 587 km²…

                    caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC cstross@wandering.shopC 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

                      @cstross @isaackuo A couple of days ago I saw someone claiming that it is closer (in straight line) from Poland to Iran than from the NW corner of Iran to the SE corner. Turns out it's true - the latter distance is ~2270 km, while the former is only ~2000 km.

                      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                      rootwyrm@weird.autos
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      @blotosmetek @cstross @isaackuo yup, it's why the joke is that the only country to ever successfully conquer Iran, is the country of Iran, and even they weren't that successful. (That itself is a long ugly story.)

                      glc@mastodon.onlineG 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        @isaackuo Yep.

                        For people who've never looked at a map (most Americans, apparently), my synopsis is, "Iran is Mordor". Big-ass empire surrounded on all sides by water or mountains. Also, it's on the other side of the world from the USA. Also-also, the littoral approaches are all naval death-traps. There's a REASON the Persian Empire didn't get conquered very often, and it's geopolitics!

                        green_bens@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                        green_bens@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                        green_bens@mastodon.green
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @cstross @isaackuo From where I’m sitting Iran has won the gulf by logistics - there’s no reason to hide under the American shield when Paedopotus Rex (the leading light in Just Stop Oil apparently) will stomp hard on you anyway and Iran has the biggest supply of drones and missiles.

                        I expect Iran to demand withdrawal of US forces from these protectorates and I suspect they’ll get it because you want to deal with a organisation that is reliable and consistent. The USA is neither.

                        isaackuo@spacey.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                        • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

                          @caesarologia @cstross @isaackuo Actually, Iran is about 2.5 times bigger than Texax, with land area 1 648 195 km² vs 676 587 km²…

                          caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC This user is from outside of this forum
                          caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC This user is from outside of this forum
                          caesarologia@masto.donte.com.br
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          @blotosmetek @cstross @isaackuo the US mind cannot comprehend the metric system. We need to translate it somehow using absurd units like washing machines per square palms or elephants per rednecks.

                          spanghero@ioc.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                            RE: https://infosec.exchange/@bontchev/116271481696841313

                            Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics. The supply chain shock will get as bad as 2022 within a couple of months—then keep getting worse.

                            captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
                            captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
                            captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            @cstross

                            #FuckIranandFindOut

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

                              @caesarologia @cstross @isaackuo Actually, Iran is about 2.5 times bigger than Texax, with land area 1 648 195 km² vs 676 587 km²…

                              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                              cstross@wandering.shop
                              wrote last edited by
                              #18

                              @blotosmetek @caesarologia @isaackuo Iran is very nearly as large as Mexico (90% of the area), 75% of the population (with a LONG history of resisting invaders), surrounded by mountains, and the closest points in CONUS and Iran are 7500km apart. (Unlike Mexico, where there's a land border.)

                              US folks who think "Iraq, Iran, what's the difference?" need to think in terms of "one is Ukraine (only crappier), the other is Russia (minus Siberia)" to get anywhere close to the scale of the problem.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

                                @cstross @isaackuo A couple of days ago I saw someone claiming that it is closer (in straight line) from Poland to Iran than from the NW corner of Iran to the SE corner. Turns out it's true - the latter distance is ~2270 km, while the former is only ~2000 km.

                                blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
                                blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
                                blotosmetek@circumstances.run
                                wrote last edited by
                                #19

                                @cstross @isaackuo BTW the missiles Iran shot at Diego Garcia allegedly fled much farther than 2000 km that Iran claimed was the maximum range of their weapons – actually, close to 4000 km; most of Europe (except Ireland, Portugal, and parts of Spain) falls within 4000 km of Iran.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • rpluim@mastodon.socialR rpluim@mastodon.social

                                  @etchedpixels @cstross The worst case I've seen suggested is Iran setting off a dirty bomb in an important population centre (do they have any plutonium?), thus rendering it uninhabitable for centuries. Somewhere like Manhattan or the City would be awful

                                  etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  etchedpixels@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #20

                                  @rpluim @cstross Manhattan wil be under water in 50 years anyway at current rates.

                                  The previous Iranian leader issued a fatwah prohibiting nuclear weapon usage but they blew him up so who knows

                                  Seems they like finely calculated responses. Like the DIego Garcia attack when Starmer decided to help the US. Easy to shoot down but the clear message being "actually we can hit London if we want"

                                  And for the world cup they just need to blow up one stadium that's empty just before a game.

                                  rpluim@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • green_bens@mastodon.greenG green_bens@mastodon.green

                                    @cstross @isaackuo From where I’m sitting Iran has won the gulf by logistics - there’s no reason to hide under the American shield when Paedopotus Rex (the leading light in Just Stop Oil apparently) will stomp hard on you anyway and Iran has the biggest supply of drones and missiles.

                                    I expect Iran to demand withdrawal of US forces from these protectorates and I suspect they’ll get it because you want to deal with a organisation that is reliable and consistent. The USA is neither.

                                    isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    isaackuo@spacey.space
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #21

                                    @green_bens @cstross I'm not an expert in the region but I'm pretty sure they will remain strongly opposed to Iran. But they may seek different strategic defense partners, such as Turkey or Ukraine.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                      @isaackuo Yep.

                                      For people who've never looked at a map (most Americans, apparently), my synopsis is, "Iran is Mordor". Big-ass empire surrounded on all sides by water or mountains. Also, it's on the other side of the world from the USA. Also-also, the littoral approaches are all naval death-traps. There's a REASON the Persian Empire didn't get conquered very often, and it's geopolitics!

                                      jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jer@chirp.enworld.org
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #22

                                      @cstross @isaackuo I think its even simpler - Iranian leadership has been planning for this for 50 years and are clearly prepared to extract maximum pain from the world until the us is stopped.

                                      Meanwhile us leadership appears to have thrown out 50 years of knowledge about Iran, strategic alliances, soft economic power, and every other advantage they had that wasn't "more expensive weapons" and started a war with about 5 seconds of thought

                                      More planning went into the Iraq War for fucks sake

                                      jmax@mastodon.socialJ isaackuo@spacey.spaceI elricofmelnibone@mastodon.socialE otmar@infosec.exchangeO faduda@mastodon.ieF 5 Replies Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE etchedpixels@mastodon.social

                                        @rpluim @cstross Manhattan wil be under water in 50 years anyway at current rates.

                                        The previous Iranian leader issued a fatwah prohibiting nuclear weapon usage but they blew him up so who knows

                                        Seems they like finely calculated responses. Like the DIego Garcia attack when Starmer decided to help the US. Easy to shoot down but the clear message being "actually we can hit London if we want"

                                        And for the world cup they just need to blow up one stadium that's empty just before a game.

                                        rpluim@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rpluim@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rpluim@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @etchedpixels @cstross Is a bunch of enriched uranium combined with conventional explosives a "nuclear weapon"? I suspect radioactive uranium dust is pretty nasty, especially in large quantities.

                                        cstross@wandering.shopC julesjones@mendeddrum.orgJ 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ jer@chirp.enworld.org

                                          @cstross @isaackuo I think its even simpler - Iranian leadership has been planning for this for 50 years and are clearly prepared to extract maximum pain from the world until the us is stopped.

                                          Meanwhile us leadership appears to have thrown out 50 years of knowledge about Iran, strategic alliances, soft economic power, and every other advantage they had that wasn't "more expensive weapons" and started a war with about 5 seconds of thought

                                          More planning went into the Iraq War for fucks sake

                                          jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jmax@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @Jer @cstross @isaackuo 5 seconds is generous. I suspect imaginary numbers are necessary to quantify the planning for this one.

                                          nowster@fedi.nowster.me.ukN 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups