Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics.

Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
89 Posts 35 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

    @cstross @isaackuo A couple of days ago I saw someone claiming that it is closer (in straight line) from Poland to Iran than from the NW corner of Iran to the SE corner. Turns out it's true - the latter distance is ~2270 km, while the former is only ~2000 km.

    caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC This user is from outside of this forum
    caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC This user is from outside of this forum
    caesarologia@masto.donte.com.br
    wrote last edited by
    #12

    @blotosmetek @cstross @isaackuo translating to US English for USonian audiences: Iran is like the Texas of the Middle East.

    blotosmetek@circumstances.runB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC caesarologia@masto.donte.com.br

      @blotosmetek @cstross @isaackuo translating to US English for USonian audiences: Iran is like the Texas of the Middle East.

      blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
      blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
      blotosmetek@circumstances.run
      wrote last edited by
      #13

      @caesarologia @cstross @isaackuo Actually, Iran is about 2.5 times bigger than Texax, with land area 1 648 195 km² vs 676 587 km²…

      caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC cstross@wandering.shopC 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

        @cstross @isaackuo A couple of days ago I saw someone claiming that it is closer (in straight line) from Poland to Iran than from the NW corner of Iran to the SE corner. Turns out it's true - the latter distance is ~2270 km, while the former is only ~2000 km.

        rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
        rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
        rootwyrm@weird.autos
        wrote last edited by
        #14

        @blotosmetek @cstross @isaackuo yup, it's why the joke is that the only country to ever successfully conquer Iran, is the country of Iran, and even they weren't that successful. (That itself is a long ugly story.)

        glc@mastodon.onlineG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

          @isaackuo Yep.

          For people who've never looked at a map (most Americans, apparently), my synopsis is, "Iran is Mordor". Big-ass empire surrounded on all sides by water or mountains. Also, it's on the other side of the world from the USA. Also-also, the littoral approaches are all naval death-traps. There's a REASON the Persian Empire didn't get conquered very often, and it's geopolitics!

          green_bens@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
          green_bens@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
          green_bens@mastodon.green
          wrote last edited by
          #15

          @cstross @isaackuo From where I’m sitting Iran has won the gulf by logistics - there’s no reason to hide under the American shield when Paedopotus Rex (the leading light in Just Stop Oil apparently) will stomp hard on you anyway and Iran has the biggest supply of drones and missiles.

          I expect Iran to demand withdrawal of US forces from these protectorates and I suspect they’ll get it because you want to deal with a organisation that is reliable and consistent. The USA is neither.

          isaackuo@spacey.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
          • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

            @caesarologia @cstross @isaackuo Actually, Iran is about 2.5 times bigger than Texax, with land area 1 648 195 km² vs 676 587 km²…

            caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC This user is from outside of this forum
            caesarologia@masto.donte.com.brC This user is from outside of this forum
            caesarologia@masto.donte.com.br
            wrote last edited by
            #16

            @blotosmetek @cstross @isaackuo the US mind cannot comprehend the metric system. We need to translate it somehow using absurd units like washing machines per square palms or elephants per rednecks.

            spanghero@ioc.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              RE: https://infosec.exchange/@bontchev/116271481696841313

              Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics. The supply chain shock will get as bad as 2022 within a couple of months—then keep getting worse.

              captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
              captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
              captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.world
              wrote last edited by
              #17

              @cstross

              #FuckIranandFindOut

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

                @caesarologia @cstross @isaackuo Actually, Iran is about 2.5 times bigger than Texax, with land area 1 648 195 km² vs 676 587 km²…

                cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                cstross@wandering.shop
                wrote last edited by
                #18

                @blotosmetek @caesarologia @isaackuo Iran is very nearly as large as Mexico (90% of the area), 75% of the population (with a LONG history of resisting invaders), surrounded by mountains, and the closest points in CONUS and Iran are 7500km apart. (Unlike Mexico, where there's a land border.)

                US folks who think "Iraq, Iran, what's the difference?" need to think in terms of "one is Ukraine (only crappier), the other is Russia (minus Siberia)" to get anywhere close to the scale of the problem.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • blotosmetek@circumstances.runB blotosmetek@circumstances.run

                  @cstross @isaackuo A couple of days ago I saw someone claiming that it is closer (in straight line) from Poland to Iran than from the NW corner of Iran to the SE corner. Turns out it's true - the latter distance is ~2270 km, while the former is only ~2000 km.

                  blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
                  blotosmetek@circumstances.runB This user is from outside of this forum
                  blotosmetek@circumstances.run
                  wrote last edited by
                  #19

                  @cstross @isaackuo BTW the missiles Iran shot at Diego Garcia allegedly fled much farther than 2000 km that Iran claimed was the maximum range of their weapons – actually, close to 4000 km; most of Europe (except Ireland, Portugal, and parts of Spain) falls within 4000 km of Iran.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rpluim@mastodon.socialR rpluim@mastodon.social

                    @etchedpixels @cstross The worst case I've seen suggested is Iran setting off a dirty bomb in an important population centre (do they have any plutonium?), thus rendering it uninhabitable for centuries. Somewhere like Manhattan or the City would be awful

                    etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    etchedpixels@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #20

                    @rpluim @cstross Manhattan wil be under water in 50 years anyway at current rates.

                    The previous Iranian leader issued a fatwah prohibiting nuclear weapon usage but they blew him up so who knows

                    Seems they like finely calculated responses. Like the DIego Garcia attack when Starmer decided to help the US. Easy to shoot down but the clear message being "actually we can hit London if we want"

                    And for the world cup they just need to blow up one stadium that's empty just before a game.

                    rpluim@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • green_bens@mastodon.greenG green_bens@mastodon.green

                      @cstross @isaackuo From where I’m sitting Iran has won the gulf by logistics - there’s no reason to hide under the American shield when Paedopotus Rex (the leading light in Just Stop Oil apparently) will stomp hard on you anyway and Iran has the biggest supply of drones and missiles.

                      I expect Iran to demand withdrawal of US forces from these protectorates and I suspect they’ll get it because you want to deal with a organisation that is reliable and consistent. The USA is neither.

                      isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                      isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                      isaackuo@spacey.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #21

                      @green_bens @cstross I'm not an expert in the region but I'm pretty sure they will remain strongly opposed to Iran. But they may seek different strategic defense partners, such as Turkey or Ukraine.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        @isaackuo Yep.

                        For people who've never looked at a map (most Americans, apparently), my synopsis is, "Iran is Mordor". Big-ass empire surrounded on all sides by water or mountains. Also, it's on the other side of the world from the USA. Also-also, the littoral approaches are all naval death-traps. There's a REASON the Persian Empire didn't get conquered very often, and it's geopolitics!

                        jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jer@chirp.enworld.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #22

                        @cstross @isaackuo I think its even simpler - Iranian leadership has been planning for this for 50 years and are clearly prepared to extract maximum pain from the world until the us is stopped.

                        Meanwhile us leadership appears to have thrown out 50 years of knowledge about Iran, strategic alliances, soft economic power, and every other advantage they had that wasn't "more expensive weapons" and started a war with about 5 seconds of thought

                        More planning went into the Iraq War for fucks sake

                        jmax@mastodon.socialJ isaackuo@spacey.spaceI elricofmelnibone@mastodon.socialE otmar@infosec.exchangeO faduda@mastodon.ieF 5 Replies Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • etchedpixels@mastodon.socialE etchedpixels@mastodon.social

                          @rpluim @cstross Manhattan wil be under water in 50 years anyway at current rates.

                          The previous Iranian leader issued a fatwah prohibiting nuclear weapon usage but they blew him up so who knows

                          Seems they like finely calculated responses. Like the DIego Garcia attack when Starmer decided to help the US. Easy to shoot down but the clear message being "actually we can hit London if we want"

                          And for the world cup they just need to blow up one stadium that's empty just before a game.

                          rpluim@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rpluim@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rpluim@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #23

                          @etchedpixels @cstross Is a bunch of enriched uranium combined with conventional explosives a "nuclear weapon"? I suspect radioactive uranium dust is pretty nasty, especially in large quantities.

                          cstross@wandering.shopC julesjones@mendeddrum.orgJ 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ jer@chirp.enworld.org

                            @cstross @isaackuo I think its even simpler - Iranian leadership has been planning for this for 50 years and are clearly prepared to extract maximum pain from the world until the us is stopped.

                            Meanwhile us leadership appears to have thrown out 50 years of knowledge about Iran, strategic alliances, soft economic power, and every other advantage they had that wasn't "more expensive weapons" and started a war with about 5 seconds of thought

                            More planning went into the Iraq War for fucks sake

                            jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jmax@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #24

                            @Jer @cstross @isaackuo 5 seconds is generous. I suspect imaginary numbers are necessary to quantify the planning for this one.

                            nowster@fedi.nowster.me.ukN 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ jer@chirp.enworld.org

                              @cstross @isaackuo I think its even simpler - Iranian leadership has been planning for this for 50 years and are clearly prepared to extract maximum pain from the world until the us is stopped.

                              Meanwhile us leadership appears to have thrown out 50 years of knowledge about Iran, strategic alliances, soft economic power, and every other advantage they had that wasn't "more expensive weapons" and started a war with about 5 seconds of thought

                              More planning went into the Iraq War for fucks sake

                              isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                              isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                              isaackuo@spacey.space
                              wrote last edited by
                              #25

                              @Jer @cstross Be that as it may, Iranian leadership could do nothing but vaguely hunker down and wait for the bombs to stop raining ... and they'd still win.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ jer@chirp.enworld.org

                                @cstross @isaackuo I think its even simpler - Iranian leadership has been planning for this for 50 years and are clearly prepared to extract maximum pain from the world until the us is stopped.

                                Meanwhile us leadership appears to have thrown out 50 years of knowledge about Iran, strategic alliances, soft economic power, and every other advantage they had that wasn't "more expensive weapons" and started a war with about 5 seconds of thought

                                More planning went into the Iraq War for fucks sake

                                elricofmelnibone@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                elricofmelnibone@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                elricofmelnibone@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #26

                                @Jer "Until the US is stopped"? And who's going to stop them? The only way this ends is from within the US. There is zero chance of an external party forcing the US to see reason. Their poltical leadership is too far down the shitter.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • rpluim@mastodon.socialR rpluim@mastodon.social

                                  @etchedpixels @cstross Is a bunch of enriched uranium combined with conventional explosives a "nuclear weapon"? I suspect radioactive uranium dust is pretty nasty, especially in large quantities.

                                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cstross@wandering.shop
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @rpluim @etchedpixels Turns out Iran's HEU stockpile last year was ALREADY bomb-ready, it would just need somewhat more of it to assemble a critical mass than top-flight fully-enriched U235.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • rpluim@mastodon.socialR rpluim@mastodon.social

                                    @etchedpixels @cstross Is a bunch of enriched uranium combined with conventional explosives a "nuclear weapon"? I suspect radioactive uranium dust is pretty nasty, especially in large quantities.

                                    julesjones@mendeddrum.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    julesjones@mendeddrum.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    julesjones@mendeddrum.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #28

                                    @rpluim @etchedpixels @cstross You wouldn't even need a lot of conventional explosives, if you know how to re-enact assorted industrial disasters in the UK over the last fifty years and place a few innocent looking oil drums full of metal powder in strategic locations ahead of time. Imagine how much fun Flixborough would have been with bonus uranium dust.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                      RE: https://infosec.exchange/@bontchev/116271481696841313

                                      Oh good grief, this summary is both farcical and tragic: also, Trump has fucked air travel for at least the next two years, never mind automobiles and logistics. The supply chain shock will get as bad as 2022 within a couple of months—then keep getting worse.

                                      sundew@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sundew@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sundew@beige.party
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @cstross I mean... yay?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ jer@chirp.enworld.org

                                        @cstross @isaackuo I think its even simpler - Iranian leadership has been planning for this for 50 years and are clearly prepared to extract maximum pain from the world until the us is stopped.

                                        Meanwhile us leadership appears to have thrown out 50 years of knowledge about Iran, strategic alliances, soft economic power, and every other advantage they had that wasn't "more expensive weapons" and started a war with about 5 seconds of thought

                                        More planning went into the Iraq War for fucks sake

                                        otmar@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        otmar@infosec.exchangeO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        otmar@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @Jer @cstross @isaackuo and now Trump is trying to out-escalate religious fanatics whose fetish is martyrdom.

                                        Ain't going to work.

                                        jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • otmar@infosec.exchangeO otmar@infosec.exchange

                                          @Jer @cstross @isaackuo and now Trump is trying to out-escalate religious fanatics whose fetish is martyrdom.

                                          Ain't going to work.

                                          jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jer@chirp.enworld.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jer@chirp.enworld.org
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #31

                                          @otmar @cstross @isaackuo I mean, religious fanatics whose fetish is martyrdom (for others) riddle the Trump administration. The us secretary of "war" belongs to a Christian apocalypse cult. The us military- especially the Air Force - is completely overrun with them at all levels

                                          Too many people think they can trigger the End Times by starting the right kind of wars and that coloring all of this too

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups