Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
20 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    keepandroidopen@techhub.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

    derderwish@social.chaotikum.orgD lexinova@cyberplace.socialL keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK gorgon_zola@digitalcourage.socialG derjoshder@bonn.socialD 7 Replies Last reply
    3
    0
    • zak@infosec.exchangeZ zak@infosec.exchange shared this topic
    • keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK keepandroidopen@techhub.social

      We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

      derderwish@social.chaotikum.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      derderwish@social.chaotikum.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      derderwish@social.chaotikum.org
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @keepandroidopen
      IBM's purchase of Red Hat looks like a complete success…
      🫠

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK keepandroidopen@techhub.social

        We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

        lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
        lexinova@cyberplace.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
        lexinova@cyberplace.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @keepandroidopen in my own case i sended message to all EU and my country MEP to ask EU to scrutinize this and prevent it to be enacted (at minimum in EU) (if EU block it other country will follow like for GDPR).

        will forward any answer received (if i happen to receive one).

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
        • keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK keepandroidopen@techhub.social

          We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

          keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          keepandroidopen@techhub.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          See also the complementary blog post: https://f-droid.org/2026/02/24/open-letter-opposing-developer-verification.html

          jack@status.sexyferret.scienceJ 1 Reply Last reply
          3
          0
          • keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK keepandroidopen@techhub.social

            We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

            gorgon_zola@digitalcourage.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gorgon_zola@digitalcourage.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gorgon_zola@digitalcourage.social
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @keepandroidopen Keep fighting!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • torproject@mastodon.socialT torproject@mastodon.social shared this topic
            • keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK keepandroidopen@techhub.social

              See also the complementary blog post: https://f-droid.org/2026/02/24/open-letter-opposing-developer-verification.html

              jack@status.sexyferret.scienceJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jack@status.sexyferret.scienceJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jack@status.sexyferret.science
              wrote last edited by
              #6
              @keepandroidopen cringe y'all broke asses can't come up with $5 between the what 6 fully funded european NGOs on this list?
              jack@status.sexyferret.scienceJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jack@status.sexyferret.scienceJ jack@status.sexyferret.science
                @keepandroidopen cringe y'all broke asses can't come up with $5 between the what 6 fully funded european NGOs on this list?
                jack@status.sexyferret.scienceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jack@status.sexyferret.scienceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jack@status.sexyferret.science
                wrote last edited by
                #7
                @keepandroidopen also because this medium is terminally unfunny i must emphasize I don't work at google... don't love them one bit
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK keepandroidopen@techhub.social

                  We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

                  derjoshder@bonn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  derjoshder@bonn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  derjoshder@bonn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @keepandroidopen
                  For real, that might force me to revert from smartphone to good old mobile phone on next... uuhm, "upgrade".
                  We, as consumers, have the power to resist by just refusing to buy their stuff. I'd rather use a desktop app for Mastodon and kick Android once and for all than yielding to this. Most of my apps (by far) are from F-Droid anyway... TTBH.
                  That is, if that also applies to custom ROMs, as I never use the bloated org. OS anyway (choose phones for compatibility).

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK keepandroidopen@techhub.social

                    We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

                    maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                    maikel@vmst.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @keepandroidopen how's this even happening ? Didn't the EU force them both to allow 3rd-party stores ?

                    docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • maikel@vmst.ioM maikel@vmst.io

                      @keepandroidopen how's this even happening ? Didn't the EU force them both to allow 3rd-party stores ?

                      docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD This user is from outside of this forum
                      docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD This user is from outside of this forum
                      docta_gervais@social.tchncs.de
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @maikel @keepandroidopen
                      They did, and the text also mentions that gatekeepers are allowed to take reasonable mesures to preserve the security of the platforms (here, Android). Technically, Google's announced change does not block third-party stores. It just forces them to go through another form of gatekeeping.

                      maikel@vmst.ioM docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD docta_gervais@social.tchncs.de

                        @maikel @keepandroidopen
                        They did, and the text also mentions that gatekeepers are allowed to take reasonable mesures to preserve the security of the platforms (here, Android). Technically, Google's announced change does not block third-party stores. It just forces them to go through another form of gatekeeping.

                        maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                        maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                        maikel@vmst.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @docta_gervais this is the same as the no cookies policy.

                        We still get the cookies, just with extra annoying pop-ups where "no" is in very small print or directly hidden.

                        We need better legislators with better knowledge of how tech works.

                        @keepandroidopen

                        docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD vekkq@social.vivaldi.netV 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD docta_gervais@social.tchncs.de

                          @maikel @keepandroidopen
                          They did, and the text also mentions that gatekeepers are allowed to take reasonable mesures to preserve the security of the platforms (here, Android). Technically, Google's announced change does not block third-party stores. It just forces them to go through another form of gatekeeping.

                          docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD This user is from outside of this forum
                          docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD This user is from outside of this forum
                          docta_gervais@social.tchncs.de
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @maikel @keepandroidopen

                          DMA III. 6.4: "The gatekeeper shall not be prevented from taking, to the extent that they are strictly necessary and proportionate, measures to ensure that third-party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper, provided that such measures are duly justified by the gatekeeper."

                          Link Preview Image
                          Regulation - 2022/1925 - EN - EUR-Lex

                          favicon

                          (eur-lex.europa.eu)

                          maikel@vmst.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • maikel@vmst.ioM maikel@vmst.io

                            @docta_gervais this is the same as the no cookies policy.

                            We still get the cookies, just with extra annoying pop-ups where "no" is in very small print or directly hidden.

                            We need better legislators with better knowledge of how tech works.

                            @keepandroidopen

                            docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD This user is from outside of this forum
                            docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD This user is from outside of this forum
                            docta_gervais@social.tchncs.de
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @maikel @keepandroidopen
                            The EU did learn something from the cookie debacle in GDPR: in the DMA regulation that came after they explicitly specified that (another) user consent could only be asked once per year. That avoids the "ask users until they say yes" problem.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • docta_gervais@social.tchncs.deD docta_gervais@social.tchncs.de

                              @maikel @keepandroidopen

                              DMA III. 6.4: "The gatekeeper shall not be prevented from taking, to the extent that they are strictly necessary and proportionate, measures to ensure that third-party software applications or software application stores do not endanger the integrity of the hardware or operating system provided by the gatekeeper, provided that such measures are duly justified by the gatekeeper."

                              Link Preview Image
                              Regulation - 2022/1925 - EN - EUR-Lex

                              favicon

                              (eur-lex.europa.eu)

                              maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                              maikel@vmst.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                              maikel@vmst.io
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @docta_gervais thank you @keepandroidopen

                              weizenspreu@chaos.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • maikel@vmst.ioM maikel@vmst.io

                                @docta_gervais this is the same as the no cookies policy.

                                We still get the cookies, just with extra annoying pop-ups where "no" is in very small print or directly hidden.

                                We need better legislators with better knowledge of how tech works.

                                @keepandroidopen

                                vekkq@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
                                vekkq@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
                                vekkq@social.vivaldi.net
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @maikel @docta_gervais Its the businesses who decide what they collect and process. GDPR makes them only report those to you, which is a good thing. The bad thing is that soo many businesses collect your data and they take any excuse they get.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • maikel@vmst.ioM maikel@vmst.io

                                  @docta_gervais thank you @keepandroidopen

                                  weizenspreu@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  weizenspreu@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                  weizenspreu@chaos.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @maikel @docta_gervais @keepandroidopen Recital 50 Subparagraph 2 of the DMA: „[…] The gatekeeper should be prevented from implementing such measures as a default setting or as pre-installation.“

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • keepandroidopen@techhub.socialK keepandroidopen@techhub.social

                                    We have published an open letter to Google opposing the Android Developer Verification Program with over 30 organizations as signatories: https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/

                                    cnx@awkward.placeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cnx@awkward.placeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cnx@awkward.place
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @captainepoch@stereophonic.space, is @husky@stereophonic.space interested in signing?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ruisan@masto.esR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ruisan@masto.esR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ruisan@masto.es
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @derderwish @keepandroidopen context?

                                      derderwish@social.chaotikum.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ruisan@masto.esR ruisan@masto.es

                                        @derderwish @keepandroidopen context?

                                        derderwish@social.chaotikum.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        derderwish@social.chaotikum.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        derderwish@social.chaotikum.org
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @ruisan @keepandroidopen Sorry, it was meant to be a response to another post. 😵‍💫

                                        ruisan@masto.esR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • derderwish@social.chaotikum.orgD derderwish@social.chaotikum.org

                                          @ruisan @keepandroidopen Sorry, it was meant to be a response to another post. 😵‍💫

                                          ruisan@masto.esR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ruisan@masto.esR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ruisan@masto.es
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @derderwish @keepandroidopen no problem

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups