Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
82 Posts 37 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

    I do not think the US is prepared for how this is going to go.

    I think we might just get stomped down by a country many folks here think of as "backwards" & believe to have far inferior military capabilities.

    If Iran is laying mines using small boats, & the US has just 4 minesweeper ships, who is better equipped? Seems to me, the US can keep shooting those boats & Iran can just get more. But if Iran destroys their minesweepers, well, they're gone.

    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
    artemis@dice.camp
    wrote last edited by
    #12

    The thing about the minesweepers comes from my ex-Navy spouse. He pays attention to exactly what equipment the US Navy has, how much it costs, how old it is, & how difficult it is to replace (they have a lot of ships & equipment that are very difficult to replace because they just stopped making any more of them a very long time ago).

    Last year, the Trump admin decommissioned HALF of the US Navy's Avenger-class mine countermeasure ships. So there were 8. Now there are 4.

    artemis@dice.campA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

      @artemis aren't the mine sweepers all stateside currently anyway?

      artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
      artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
      artemis@dice.camp
      wrote last edited by
      #13

      @quixoticgeek
      I believe so. They didn't plan for any of this.

      quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ jeffrey@tooting.chJ 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

        So it turns out that having the most *expensive* military tech in the world may not be the best strategy, huh?

        Who could have known that having very expensive equipment & arms/ammunition that take a long time to make might not be an advantage?

        teflontrout@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
        teflontrout@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
        teflontrout@beige.party
        wrote last edited by
        #14

        @artemis

        goddamn how are we the protoss and zerg at the same time

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

          The thing about the minesweepers comes from my ex-Navy spouse. He pays attention to exactly what equipment the US Navy has, how much it costs, how old it is, & how difficult it is to replace (they have a lot of ships & equipment that are very difficult to replace because they just stopped making any more of them a very long time ago).

          Last year, the Trump admin decommissioned HALF of the US Navy's Avenger-class mine countermeasure ships. So there were 8. Now there are 4.

          artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
          artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
          artemis@dice.camp
          wrote last edited by
          #15

          Since he keeps up on all this stuff & has knowledge of naval operations, spouse has a pretty good idea of what the Navy is capable of, & he thinks the US is pretty much fucked when it comes to the Straits of Hormuz.

          They didn't even THINK about this once before doing it.

          artemis@dice.campA woozle@toot.catW 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

            @quixoticgeek
            I believe so. They didn't plan for any of this.

            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
            quixoticgeek@social.v.st
            wrote last edited by
            #16

            @artemis yikes. If Wikipedia is right. The last four were moved *from* Bahrain in January. Madness.

            dubiousblur@social.treehouse.systemsD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

              @quixoticgeek
              I believe so. They didn't plan for any of this.

              jeffrey@tooting.chJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jeffrey@tooting.chJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jeffrey@tooting.ch
              wrote last edited by
              #17

              @artemis @quixoticgeek There are UK minesweepers in Bahrain. I hope we don’t join this illegal and stupid war.

              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jeffrey@tooting.chJ jeffrey@tooting.ch

                @artemis @quixoticgeek There are UK minesweepers in Bahrain. I hope we don’t join this illegal and stupid war.

                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                wrote last edited by
                #18

                @Jeffrey @artemis Wikipedia disagrees. Suggests the last of the UK mine hunter fleet was returned to blighty last year...

                jeffrey@tooting.chJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                  I do not think the US is prepared for how this is going to go.

                  I think we might just get stomped down by a country many folks here think of as "backwards" & believe to have far inferior military capabilities.

                  If Iran is laying mines using small boats, & the US has just 4 minesweeper ships, who is better equipped? Seems to me, the US can keep shooting those boats & Iran can just get more. But if Iran destroys their minesweepers, well, they're gone.

                  burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                  burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                  burnitdown@beige.party
                  wrote last edited by
                  #19

                  @artemis Iran is not ill-equipped to fight a war. it is very good at restraint. the reason there are no USA boots on the ground is because the commanders are chickenshit assholes who know they'll get torn to peices the moment they do that. Iranians are armed. Iran has a professional military. and like Hezbollah, they will sacrifice cheap hardware for as long as they can before they get into heavier weaponry and sacrificing soldiers' lives.

                  artemis@dice.campA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                    I do not think the US is prepared for how this is going to go.

                    I think we might just get stomped down by a country many folks here think of as "backwards" & believe to have far inferior military capabilities.

                    If Iran is laying mines using small boats, & the US has just 4 minesweeper ships, who is better equipped? Seems to me, the US can keep shooting those boats & Iran can just get more. But if Iran destroys their minesweepers, well, they're gone.

                    avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                    avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                    avuko@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #20

                    @artemis Asymmetric warfare is a real thing.

                    Attention Required! | Cloudflare

                    favicon

                    (www.raf.mod.uk)

                    Just one example.

                    The British RAF celebrates taking down two drones (I'll take those to be Shahed-136 drones, unit cost about $35.000) with two ASRAAM (Unit cost >£200,000) by scrambling a F35 (probably the F-35B Lightning II, unit cost $109 million to $135 million+) and two Typhoons (unit cost about $200 million to $300 million).

                    So that's roughly (not calculating fuel, deployment, training, personnel, etc. and taking the cheapest known costs)

                    $264.857 + $264.857 + $109.000.000 + $200.000.000 + $200.000.000 =

                    $509.529.714 versus $70.000.

                    LMAO.

                    rndanger@infosec.exchangeR avuko@infosec.exchangeA sabik@rants.auS 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                      @Jeffrey @artemis Wikipedia disagrees. Suggests the last of the UK mine hunter fleet was returned to blighty last year...

                      jeffrey@tooting.chJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jeffrey@tooting.chJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jeffrey@tooting.ch
                      wrote last edited by
                      #21

                      @artemis @quixoticgeek Ah, didn’t know that. I do know, though, that other vessels have been equipped to do mine hunting activities as older sweepers are phased out with crews redeployed as teams to those ships………don’t know if the US has also done this.

                      artemis@dice.campA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                        Since he keeps up on all this stuff & has knowledge of naval operations, spouse has a pretty good idea of what the Navy is capable of, & he thinks the US is pretty much fucked when it comes to the Straits of Hormuz.

                        They didn't even THINK about this once before doing it.

                        artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                        artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                        artemis@dice.camp
                        wrote last edited by
                        #22

                        I also think they didn't comprehend that Iran has prepared for this. I don't mean bracing up due to recent threats. I mean, the US has been threatening their very existence for such a very long time.

                        They are prepared, they have strategies, they don't use expensive tech where something else will do, & they have made themselves intimately familiar with their enemies' capabilities. What else would anyone expect them to do?

                        They knew we intended to come for them eventually.

                        artemis@dice.campA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jeffrey@tooting.chJ jeffrey@tooting.ch

                          @artemis @quixoticgeek Ah, didn’t know that. I do know, though, that other vessels have been equipped to do mine hunting activities as older sweepers are phased out with crews redeployed as teams to those ships………don’t know if the US has also done this.

                          artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                          artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                          artemis@dice.camp
                          wrote last edited by
                          #23

                          @Jeffrey @quixoticgeek
                          I think spouse said that technically the US Navy has other ships that are supposed to have this capability. They just aren't actually any good at it.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • avuko@infosec.exchangeA avuko@infosec.exchange

                            @artemis Asymmetric warfare is a real thing.

                            Attention Required! | Cloudflare

                            favicon

                            (www.raf.mod.uk)

                            Just one example.

                            The British RAF celebrates taking down two drones (I'll take those to be Shahed-136 drones, unit cost about $35.000) with two ASRAAM (Unit cost >£200,000) by scrambling a F35 (probably the F-35B Lightning II, unit cost $109 million to $135 million+) and two Typhoons (unit cost about $200 million to $300 million).

                            So that's roughly (not calculating fuel, deployment, training, personnel, etc. and taking the cheapest known costs)

                            $264.857 + $264.857 + $109.000.000 + $200.000.000 + $200.000.000 =

                            $509.529.714 versus $70.000.

                            LMAO.

                            rndanger@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rndanger@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rndanger@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #24

                            @avuko @artemis
                            That's State Power, baby

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • burnitdown@beige.partyB burnitdown@beige.party

                              @artemis Iran is not ill-equipped to fight a war. it is very good at restraint. the reason there are no USA boots on the ground is because the commanders are chickenshit assholes who know they'll get torn to peices the moment they do that. Iranians are armed. Iran has a professional military. and like Hezbollah, they will sacrifice cheap hardware for as long as they can before they get into heavier weaponry and sacrificing soldiers' lives.

                              artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                              artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                              artemis@dice.camp
                              wrote last edited by
                              #25

                              @burnitdown
                              I just added a clarification in case it was unclear in my post: I don't believe their military capabilities are insignificant, but I know that a lot of people DO (or did) believe that.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                                artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                                artemis@dice.camp
                                wrote last edited by
                                #26

                                @twobiscuits
                                Well, yeah. But these people don't have memories that go back that far, so Ukraine is the "ok, how did you not realize this?" example.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • avuko@infosec.exchangeA avuko@infosec.exchange

                                  @artemis Asymmetric warfare is a real thing.

                                  Attention Required! | Cloudflare

                                  favicon

                                  (www.raf.mod.uk)

                                  Just one example.

                                  The British RAF celebrates taking down two drones (I'll take those to be Shahed-136 drones, unit cost about $35.000) with two ASRAAM (Unit cost >£200,000) by scrambling a F35 (probably the F-35B Lightning II, unit cost $109 million to $135 million+) and two Typhoons (unit cost about $200 million to $300 million).

                                  So that's roughly (not calculating fuel, deployment, training, personnel, etc. and taking the cheapest known costs)

                                  $264.857 + $264.857 + $109.000.000 + $200.000.000 + $200.000.000 =

                                  $509.529.714 versus $70.000.

                                  LMAO.

                                  avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  avuko@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @artemis

                                  Okay, okay, one more example, just for fun.

                                  The sober comment of a NATO commander afterwards: “We’re fucked.”

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Exercise: Ukrainian drone pilots wipe out NATO battalions

                                  During the "Hedgehog 2025" exercise in Estonia, NATO troops were clearly shown their limits in a duel with Ukrainian drone teams.

                                  favicon

                                  Militär Aktuell – Militär News & Analysen zu internationalen Krisen, Streitkräften & der Defence-Industrie (militaeraktuell.at)

                                  avuko@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                                    @artemis yikes. If Wikipedia is right. The last four were moved *from* Bahrain in January. Madness.

                                    dubiousblur@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dubiousblur@social.treehouse.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    dubiousblur@social.treehouse.systems
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #28

                                    @quixoticgeek @artemis

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                      Iran appears to be using shortwave radio to send cyphered messages. It's an old school Soviet method of communication. And guess what? It works. None of it goes through a computer, so there is nothing to hack. It's inexpensive & easy to do, & you can just keep changing frequencies when your opponents start interfering with the one you're using.

                                      All the fancy spy equipment the US has? Not meant to deal with that simple, low-tech tactic.

                                      voxofgod@beige.partyV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      voxofgod@beige.partyV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      voxofgod@beige.party
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @artemis Pentagon Persian Gulf war games were notorious....cuz they were unwinnable

                                      And then they created false circumstances, basically cheating for the usa

                                      And STILL the games are unwinnable.

                                      This was with strategists

                                      And people who think beyond the end case scenarios (death camps and final solutions) as a feature and not a horror

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                        As we have ALREADY seen in Ukraine, military "superpowers" have a real problem facing off against forces defending their homeland using cheap & quick-to-manufacture arms & equipment.

                                        lando@infosec.townL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lando@infosec.townL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lando@infosec.town
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @artemis where have I heard these lessons before? Afghanistan, Afghanistan (Soviet), Vietnam, Korea, WWII Eastern European front, Afghanistan (British), the US fucking Revolution?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • artemis@dice.campA artemis@dice.camp

                                          I also think they didn't comprehend that Iran has prepared for this. I don't mean bracing up due to recent threats. I mean, the US has been threatening their very existence for such a very long time.

                                          They are prepared, they have strategies, they don't use expensive tech where something else will do, & they have made themselves intimately familiar with their enemies' capabilities. What else would anyone expect them to do?

                                          They knew we intended to come for them eventually.

                                          artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          artemis@dice.campA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          artemis@dice.camp
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #31

                                          Delusional racism...

                                          These motherfuckers think they are the Master Race so they can't actually comprehend that brown people could beat them. They think they win by default.

                                          Their brains are so cooked. They did not fucking believe this could possibly be difficult.

                                          artemis@dice.campA sister_ratched@toot.communityS 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups