Do you all remember that the International Criminal Court has already issued arrest warrants for war crimes for Netanyahu and Gallant

[lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@petergleick i dance a little

[jripley@mastodon.social]

@petergleick I am sure this is under way, but the speed of law is disappointingly slow, and whichever lawyer signs up to lead this, knows they’re signing up to be personally sanctioned by the US and closest allies.

[laprice@beige.party]

@petergleick should absolutely be filed against Trump and Hegseth. What is he going to do besides add them to the OFAC lists?

And as the competent court for this matter they have an obligation to act.

[laprice@beige.party]

@jadp @petergleick technically Rumsfeld not GWB.

[joepbc@mastodon.social]

@petergleick I think people are too afraid of Trump's response to do what should be done for the sake of justice.

[proscience@toot.community]

@petergleick

The same should be done for those who help them in Europe:

They are accomplices.

[dzwiedziu@mastodon.social]

@petergleick
I hope that they'll get their mails off Microsoft and (financial) affairs in order before.

@aral

[budududuroiu@hachyderm.io]

@petergleick sigh

> The American Service-Members' Protection Act, known as the Hague Invasion Act [...] gives the president power to use "all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act

[stonsoftware@mastodon.social]

@jadp @petergleick that doesn’t matter. Venezuela is

[epistatacadam@toot.wales]

@jadp @petergleick nor is Israel! The important point is did the alleged crime involve a signatory. Palestine is a full member, but Iran is merely a signatory who has not ratified the treaty. I'm unclear if that permits it to act. Can some international lawyer clarify?