the bias against change is very noticable in the headlines and shock phrases when it comes to improvements to linux.
-
the bias against change is very noticable in the headlines and shock phrases when it comes to improvements to linux. its the default to point at the desktops/wayland/systemd/flatpak as being some kind of radical usurpers of the existent. how dare they break with us, the ones keeping the good old ways true!
it's never a headline commemorating yet another anniversary of a spite fork failing to achieve basic improvements, of some bespoke pet project still not delivering guarantees that make accessibility systems work.
-
the bias against change is very noticable in the headlines and shock phrases when it comes to improvements to linux. its the default to point at the desktops/wayland/systemd/flatpak as being some kind of radical usurpers of the existent. how dare they break with us, the ones keeping the good old ways true!
it's never a headline commemorating yet another anniversary of a spite fork failing to achieve basic improvements, of some bespoke pet project still not delivering guarantees that make accessibility systems work.
The timing of this is hilarious because I just got into a conversation with a guy like that. Though I guess the beauty of open source is that these people can continue to use these things regardless, but the narrative spun can be quite annoying to hear all the time.
