<![CDATA[the bias against change is very noticable in the headlines and shock phrases when it comes to improvements to linux.]]>the bias against change is very noticable in the headlines and shock phrases when it comes to improvements to linux. its the default to point at the desktops/wayland/systemd/flatpak as being some kind of radical usurpers of the existent. how dare they break with us, the ones keeping the good old ways true!

it's never a headline commemorating yet another anniversary of a spite fork failing to achieve basic improvements, of some bespoke pet project still not delivering guarantees that make accessibility systems work.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/0e628e6c-9517-4e29-a829-5ec082fe4fe5/the-bias-against-change-is-very-noticable-in-the-headlines-and-shock-phrases-when-it-comes-to-improvements-to-linux.RSS for NodeSat, 30 May 2026 20:08:15 GMTMon, 25 May 2026 13:03:02 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to the bias against change is very noticable in the headlines and shock phrases when it comes to improvements to linux. on Mon, 25 May 2026 15:53:45 GMT]]>@jackperkins

The timing of this is hilarious because I just got into a conversation with a guy like that. Though I guess the beauty of open source is that these people can continue to use these things regardless, but the narrative spun can be quite annoying to hear all the time.

]]>https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://techhub.social/users/ryusei/statuses/116636019924484245https://board.circlewithadot.net/post/https://techhub.social/users/ryusei/statuses/116636019924484245Mon, 25 May 2026 15:53:45 GMT