And that's how I ended up on mastodon
-
And that's how I ended up on mastodon
-
@michaelgemar @elyn @aburka it is also possible to have fungi and like cats, though of course you may "have" fungi in the same way you "have" cats, ie you are their staff, so the question of ownership is at the very least complex.... I need to go and lie down.
@robparsons @michaelgemar @elyn I recommend clotrimazole
-
There are dozens of us. Dozens!
But it's not a cult. Those weird people from beige.party, they're a cult but us? Nope, we're definitely not a cult.
-
@elyn Welcome to Mastodon! Come for the toots, stay for the company
-
And that's how I ended up on mastodon
@elyn as you do lol
-
@autisticplushy hey there
-
And that's how I ended up on mastodon
@elyn This tracks.
-
@robparsons @michaelgemar @elyn I recommend clotrimazole
@aburka @robparsons @michaelgemar but that'll de-fun the guys
-
@elyn Yeah, I advise folks to steer clear of the core type machinery implementation unless they actually *want* to stretch their brains into weird shapes in order to understand it. Lots of "this isn't quite true yet, but it will be true before it needs to be true, just trust us on that, computer".
I also love the fact that it is all completely *un*necessary knowledge for folks that just want to use Python without worrying about the fiddly details of how it works.
@ancoghlan I love fiddly details and non-euclidean neurology! It's good compilers don't appear to be conscious. I can't fathom the depths of their paranoia if they had to experience all the lies and coercion we put them through
-
And that's how I ended up on mastodon
That's a hit toot on Mastodon
I got it from the trending bot so, yeah, that's indeed a hit toot on Mastodon -
And that's how I ended up on mastodon
@elyn Some days I wake up and decide I want to invent a new type of number. I'm glad Python supports this.
-
And that's how I ended up on mastodon
@elyn you found The Place (tm)
-
And that's how I ended up on mastodon
@elyn omg I was right holy shit
-
@elyn omg I was right holy shit
@ArchiteuthisFlux YOU REALLY WERE, OMG
-
That's a hit toot on Mastodon
I got it from the trending bot so, yeah, that's indeed a hit toot on Mastodon@csolisr @ArchiteuthisFlux is a prophet, truly
-
@ancoghlan I love fiddly details and non-euclidean neurology! It's good compilers don't appear to be conscious. I can't fathom the depths of their paranoia if they had to experience all the lies and coercion we put them through
@elyn @ancoghlan a lot of the python internal type machinery was added before python had spellable types, which now shows up as those strange breaks in the type math.
there's a similar case where `float` actually means `float | int`, so there's now no way of saying just float, no int, even though `isinstance(1, float) == False`.
-
@csolisr @ArchiteuthisFlux is a prophet, truly
-
@elyn @ancoghlan a lot of the python internal type machinery was added before python had spellable types, which now shows up as those strange breaks in the type math.
there's a similar case where `float` actually means `float | int`, so there's now no way of saying just float, no int, even though `isinstance(1, float) == False`.
@konstin @ancoghlan Maybe they should just change it, surely there's no historical precedent indicating that changing foundational design details would ever stifle adoption or fracture a community!
-
@elyn @ancoghlan a lot of the python internal type machinery was added before python had spellable types, which now shows up as those strange breaks in the type math.
there's a similar case where `float` actually means `float | int`, so there's now no way of saying just float, no int, even though `isinstance(1, float) == False`.
@konstin @ancoghlan That's genuinely really cool to know tho, thank u
