Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming.

Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
copyfail
50 Posts 22 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

    Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming. Here’s my contribution. On your Linux machine add

    initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init

    to your kernel boot commandline (typically in grub). Reboot. You are now safe until the updated kernel packages become available. For distributions with the `grubby` command this is done as root with

    # grubby --update-kernel=ALL --args="initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init"

    This mitigation comes courtesy of Red Hat. Our engineers keep you safe 🙂

    1/4

    Link Preview Image
    moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    moses_izumi@fe.disroot.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    moses_izumi@fe.disroot.org
    wrote last edited by
    #38
    @jwildeboer
    There's a special place in hell for security researchers who obfuscate their proof-of-concept exploit code.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sorro@woof.techS sorro@woof.tech

      @jwildeboer since android runs with the linux kernel, is android also affected?

      caravantraveller@social.cologneC This user is from outside of this forum
      caravantraveller@social.cologneC This user is from outside of this forum
      caravantraveller@social.cologne
      wrote last edited by
      #39

      @Sorro @jwildeboer

      Are there any users on your Android phone who might take advantage of #copyfail ?

      For single-user systems there is no problem, because it's not a remote exploit.

      sorro@woof.techS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

        @flxtr @Larvitz I really try hard to make this thread helpful and pragmatic, but boys gotta be boys I guess 😞

        larvitz@burningboard.netL This user is from outside of this forum
        larvitz@burningboard.netL This user is from outside of this forum
        larvitz@burningboard.net
        wrote last edited by
        #40

        @jwildeboer @flxtr Deleted it. Sorry, could not help myself and thought "Galgenhumor" could help make this serious topic a bit more relaxed.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • psyhackological@fosstodon.orgP psyhackological@fosstodon.org

          @jwildeboer what about those who cannot be downtimed to reboot?

          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
          wrote last edited by
          #41

          @psyhackological They'll have to do a risk calculation. It is a local user exploit, so in most cases when you freeze the current software deployment, you should be safe until the kernel patches have arrived. In general, though, your contingency plans should ALWAYS make reboots possible.

          psyhackological@fosstodon.orgP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

            @psyhackological They'll have to do a risk calculation. It is a local user exploit, so in most cases when you freeze the current software deployment, you should be safe until the kernel patches have arrived. In general, though, your contingency plans should ALWAYS make reboots possible.

            psyhackological@fosstodon.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
            psyhackological@fosstodon.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
            psyhackological@fosstodon.org
            wrote last edited by
            #42

            @jwildeboer from what I read isn't this about removing kernel module? I think this keeps the system running without a reboot

            echo "install algif_aead /bin/false" > /etc/modprobe.d/disable-algif.conf
            rmmod algif_aead

            Don't know what will happen when it reboots though so I would stick to your plan.

            jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • psyhackological@fosstodon.orgP psyhackological@fosstodon.org

              @jwildeboer from what I read isn't this about removing kernel module? I think this keeps the system running without a reboot

              echo "install algif_aead /bin/false" > /etc/modprobe.d/disable-algif.conf
              rmmod algif_aead

              Don't know what will happen when it reboots though so I would stick to your plan.

              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
              wrote last edited by
              #43

              @psyhackological Depends on your distribution. Some have it as module, some have it directly compiled into the kernel.

              psyhackological@fosstodon.orgP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                @Sorro I don't know. Depends if `algif_aead` is compiled into the kernel or loaded as module, if it is present at all in Android kernels. If somebody has checked, please do reply.

                H This user is from outside of this forum
                H This user is from outside of this forum
                hokid@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #44

                @jwildeboer @Sorro It's a bit hard to say because of the many, many flavors of Android in the wild, but it is very likely not affected for various reasons: by default, SELinux is configured to not allow alg_socket for sandboxed apps (see https://android.googlesource.com/platform/system/sepolicy/+/refs/tags/android-16.0.0_r4/private/app_neverallows.te#141), there are usually no suid binaries on Android, and algif_aead is usually not provided in the first place. Of course, a very old Android version might be affected, but in that case, you're open to various other exploits anyway...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                  @psyhackological Depends on your distribution. Some have it as module, some have it directly compiled into the kernel.

                  psyhackological@fosstodon.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                  psyhackological@fosstodon.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                  psyhackological@fosstodon.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #45

                  @jwildeboer we're on Ubuntu. Yiakes then... So it needs to be checked otherwise.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                    Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming. Here’s my contribution. On your Linux machine add

                    initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init

                    to your kernel boot commandline (typically in grub). Reboot. You are now safe until the updated kernel packages become available. For distributions with the `grubby` command this is done as root with

                    # grubby --update-kernel=ALL --args="initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init"

                    This mitigation comes courtesy of Red Hat. Our engineers keep you safe 🙂

                    1/4

                    Link Preview Image
                    sstendahl@floss.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sstendahl@floss.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sstendahl@floss.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #46

                    @jwildeboer thanks for the post. To add, also keep on eye on which distro have patched the mitigation, Fedora patched it a week ago or so iirc, Fedora 44 doesn’t have the exploit at all. Neither does anything about running the 7.x kernel.

                    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sstendahl@floss.socialS sstendahl@floss.social

                      @jwildeboer thanks for the post. To add, also keep on eye on which distro have patched the mitigation, Fedora patched it a week ago or so iirc, Fedora 44 doesn’t have the exploit at all. Neither does anything about running the 7.x kernel.

                      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
                      wrote last edited by
                      #47

                      @sstendahl Yes, that's in the second post of my thread, with links 🙂 https://social.wildeboer.net/@jwildeboer/116503831839617808

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • caravantraveller@social.cologneC caravantraveller@social.cologne

                        @Sorro @jwildeboer

                        Are there any users on your Android phone who might take advantage of #copyfail ?

                        For single-user systems there is no problem, because it's not a remote exploit.

                        sorro@woof.techS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sorro@woof.techS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sorro@woof.tech
                        wrote last edited by
                        #48

                        @caravantraveller @jwildeboer ooh, i didnt really understand much about the exploit so i thought it was a remote exploit. that's a relief for me even for my linux laptop

                        thanks for telling me!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                          Ah, the #copyfail clickbait posts are coming. Here’s my contribution. On your Linux machine add

                          initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init

                          to your kernel boot commandline (typically in grub). Reboot. You are now safe until the updated kernel packages become available. For distributions with the `grubby` command this is done as root with

                          # grubby --update-kernel=ALL --args="initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init"

                          This mitigation comes courtesy of Red Hat. Our engineers keep you safe 🙂

                          1/4

                          Link Preview Image
                          leah@blahaj.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          leah@blahaj.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          leah@blahaj.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #49

                          @jwildeboer I think this only works when the module is builtin (as on RHEL, but not many others).

                          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • leah@blahaj.socialL leah@blahaj.social

                            @jwildeboer I think this only works when the module is builtin (as on RHEL, but not many others).

                            jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
                            wrote last edited by
                            #50

                            @leah It should still work, as initcall_blacklist on init functions works regardless of it being a module or compiled in. I don't have a machine with it built as a module at hand, nor do I have the time to spin one up and check. If somebody else could help here and share the result, much appreciated.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups