You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
-
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
@argentumcation@social.treehouse.systems "Two in one is bullshit term, because one is not big enough to hold two. That’s why two was created. If it [were] two in one, it would be overflowing. Bottle would be all sticky and shit."
- Mitch Hedberg :3 -
@argentumcation 2-in-1 shampoo does one thing: clean. In that sense, it complies with the Unix philosophy (just as sh and make do). By the same token, why stop at 2? We should extend the shampoo container with extra compartments to hold all manner of cleaning chemicals, as well as various abrasive surfaces, to produce the most Unixy cleaning tool of them all: 800 millilitres and constantly scrubbing.
@wizzwizz4 @argentumcation but 2 in 1 does 2 things -
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
It's ok if you use a pipe.
-
It's ok if you use a pipe.
@doctormo
I mean sure if it's aliased toshampoo $1 | conditioner -
@doctormo
I mean sure if it's aliased toshampoo $1 | conditioner@argentumcation @doctormo
I think this debate ignores accessibility concerns, and I find that offensive.
-
@doctormo
I mean sure if it's aliased toshampoo $1 | conditionerwater | shampoo && conditioner || main && tail
-
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
Systemd, your reliable bleach, detergent, fabric softener, dish soap, hand soap, shampoo, conditioner, mouth wash and hair foam.
@argentumcation@social.treehouse.systems -
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
@argentumcation meanwhile in our household we use soapsystemd for shower, dishes, antifreeze, mouthwash, fabric conditioner, and to add a fresh spritz to the kids' water bottles.
-
@argentumcation .... it isn't all files?
@k1m
that's shampoo9
@argentumcation -
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
@argentumcation, /me looks terrified at my vitamin pills.
-
@argentumcation @wizzwizz4
systemd-bathd@w8l @argentumcation @wizzwizz4 based! (get it, cuz soap.. hehe.. well actually that stuff uses detergent, not soap but-)
-
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
@argentumcation a true Unix purist would never buy a car with an air conditioner in it
-
@wizzwizz4 you've created Systemd for showering
@argentumcation @wizzwizz4
no, it's ffmpeg of showering -
water | shampoo && conditioner || main && tail
@doctormo @argentumcation don't forget head and potentially cat
-
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
@argentumcation you're not supposed to use separate shampoo and shower gel because of liquid deduplication policies -
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
@argentumcation@social.treehouse.systems those 2-in-1 are pretty crap if you have long hair anyway
-
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
@argentumcation It's okay if you pipe the shampoo through the conditioner though.
-
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
@argentumcation correct. Soap in a soap bag for everything. Conditioner and moisturizer are for GUI users. My cats love my sandpaper hands
-
@argentumcation @wizzwizz4
systemd-bathd@w8l @argentumcation @wizzwizz4
machinectl cleanexists, bathd is already real lmao -
You're not supposed to use the 2-in-1 shampoo because it violates the Unix philosophy
@argentumcation `head`, not `head`-and-shoulders
