Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #UnpopularOpinion: Open registration is an anti-pattern for the #Fediverse.

#UnpopularOpinion: Open registration is an anti-pattern for the #Fediverse.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
unpopularopiniofediverse
26 Posts 13 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • computeum@mastodon.bayernC computeum@mastodon.bayern

    @jwildeboer

    I'm sorry if this reads like there's a "yes" part of any sort. That wasn't intended in any way. Both points should describe why it'll not produce a positive change.

    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
    wrote last edited by
    #17

    @Computeum So it's an absolute NO to you. Got it. What has triggered me here is that absolute no. No "in my opinion". But you saying there is no "yes" and you own the truth and only you. That's the German "yes, but" 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

      #UnpopularOpinion: Open registration is an anti-pattern for the #Fediverse. A minimal human intervention like a personal invitation (to create a lightweight Web Of Trust approach) or approval by the admins is the better, more Fediverse way. This is my personal opinion. Please feel free to (respectfully) discuss in the replies. I might be wrong, I am open for criticism.

      lil5@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
      lil5@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
      lil5@social.linux.pizza
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      @jwildeboer That’s rich coming from a single user instance.

      jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

        #UnpopularOpinion: Open registration is an anti-pattern for the #Fediverse. A minimal human intervention like a personal invitation (to create a lightweight Web Of Trust approach) or approval by the admins is the better, more Fediverse way. This is my personal opinion. Please feel free to (respectfully) discuss in the replies. I might be wrong, I am open for criticism.

        murteza@edmontonian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        murteza@edmontonian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        murteza@edmontonian.social
        wrote last edited by
        #19
        @jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
        Not that unpopular among regional instance admins. Edmontonian Social was and is invite only. I see this as a necessity since it is trying to encourage people to meet face-to-face, and find build local connections. Invitations kinda necessitate people meeting in-person to join in the first place. I don't mind slow adoption as it helps me keep on top of moderation, as I learn the ropes of hosting a social platform.

        Our members can create invitation codes once a day. This is to prevent malicious people from mass creating invites, thus opening bot accounts fast. Also new users are prevented from creating new invites for some time. It may seem excessive, but people I met mostly welcomed the thought put into deterring bots and spammers.
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

          And a more detailed, complicated topic: new accounts that have been opened for less than 48 hours (or longer, unsure what makes most sense) should be limited in following accounts. In that first period, every follow must be approved by the account they want to follow. After these 48 hours (or longer) that limitation could be lifted.

          echopapa@social.tchncs.deE This user is from outside of this forum
          echopapa@social.tchncs.deE This user is from outside of this forum
          echopapa@social.tchncs.de
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          @jwildeboer

          But these would be some kind of "script kiddie" limitations today, regarding bots or trolls.

          Some kind of imposed automated old school BBS netiquette for human users (but at that days, somebody explained this person to person, why it's better not trigger immediately the noobs/newbie alarm and why you won't like to get roasted by flame throwers).

          I think this works with games, but not with social media today. So we need more gamification and a user level system. Only if you are able to recite complicated spells are you allowed to post something or to ban somebody (am I talking about IRC???)

          🙂

          jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • lil5@social.linux.pizzaL lil5@social.linux.pizza

            @jwildeboer That’s rich coming from a single user instance.

            jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            @lil5 That's logical coming from an instance that is here since 2018 and explicitly being single user 🙂

            lil5@social.linux.pizzaL 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • echopapa@social.tchncs.deE echopapa@social.tchncs.de

              @jwildeboer

              But these would be some kind of "script kiddie" limitations today, regarding bots or trolls.

              Some kind of imposed automated old school BBS netiquette for human users (but at that days, somebody explained this person to person, why it's better not trigger immediately the noobs/newbie alarm and why you won't like to get roasted by flame throwers).

              I think this works with games, but not with social media today. So we need more gamification and a user level system. Only if you are able to recite complicated spells are you allowed to post something or to ban somebody (am I talking about IRC???)

              🙂

              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              @echopapa Every time one of my posts gets mildly "successful", I get a bunch of accounts following me, typically from mastodon.social, typically being some AI generated profile picture of a pretty woman with 0 followers, created less than 24 hours ago, with a bio that reads some variation of "Just a simple girl looking for cool guys to talk to".

              echopapa@social.tchncs.deE 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                #UnpopularOpinion: Open registration is an anti-pattern for the #Fediverse. A minimal human intervention like a personal invitation (to create a lightweight Web Of Trust approach) or approval by the admins is the better, more Fediverse way. This is my personal opinion. Please feel free to (respectfully) discuss in the replies. I might be wrong, I am open for criticism.

                bjornw@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                bjornw@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                bjornw@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                @jwildeboer I agree.

                A short description of why you would like to join is quite normal when joining a specific community, why not replicate this online?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                  @lil5 That's logical coming from an instance that is here since 2018 and explicitly being single user 🙂

                  lil5@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lil5@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lil5@social.linux.pizza
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  @jwildeboer That’s exactly my point. How many requests have you had of people asking to join your server?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                    #UnpopularOpinion: Open registration is an anti-pattern for the #Fediverse. A minimal human intervention like a personal invitation (to create a lightweight Web Of Trust approach) or approval by the admins is the better, more Fediverse way. This is my personal opinion. Please feel free to (respectfully) discuss in the replies. I might be wrong, I am open for criticism.

                    zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zombiecide@polyglot.city
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    @jwildeboer I liked the approach good discussion boards used to have, with registration via approval, people having to interact and show who they are before they get access to features like direct messages or boards where sometimes personal information is mentioned. (Like many people I was pulled away from having to actively seek out people and discussions to interact with to places with algorithmic feeds and the illusion of interaction via an emoji. And I know, good moderation is a lot of work)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                      @echopapa Every time one of my posts gets mildly "successful", I get a bunch of accounts following me, typically from mastodon.social, typically being some AI generated profile picture of a pretty woman with 0 followers, created less than 24 hours ago, with a bio that reads some variation of "Just a simple girl looking for cool guys to talk to".

                      echopapa@social.tchncs.deE This user is from outside of this forum
                      echopapa@social.tchncs.deE This user is from outside of this forum
                      echopapa@social.tchncs.de
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      @jwildeboer

                      I know that. There also some new followers per week with questionable accounts which follow me (Not only pretty women).Typically after some hours most of them are deleted.

                      Somewhat annoying, but I think easy onboarding will be necessary for the Fediverse for some further time. There is already the "which server IS best for me" problem.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups