Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. step one in any possible reboot of the free software movement is always gonna be to refuse corporate sponsorship .

step one in any possible reboot of the free software movement is always gonna be to refuse corporate sponsorship .

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
34 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fiore@brain.worm.pinkF fiore@brain.worm.pink

    step one in any possible reboot of the free software movement is always gonna be to refuse corporate sponsorship . always always .

    fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
    fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
    fiore@brain.worm.pink
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    step two is being explicitly harmful to corporations but thats additional

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • fiore@brain.worm.pinkF fiore@brain.worm.pink

      step one in any possible reboot of the free software movement is always gonna be to refuse corporate sponsorship . always always .

      hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
      hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
      hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @fiore i think we need an effective description of "corporate". is this a legal definition? does this disadvantage us compared to mysteriously funded nonprofit orgs?

      hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH fiore@brain.worm.pinkF 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

        @fiore i think we need an effective description of "corporate". is this a legal definition? does this disadvantage us compared to mysteriously funded nonprofit orgs?

        hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
        hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
        hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @fiore cause i have Concerns about mysteriously funded nonprofit orgs

        hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

          @fiore cause i have Concerns about mysteriously funded nonprofit orgs

          hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
          hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
          hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @fiore what about a service/tech support contract. is that allowed

          fiore@brain.worm.pinkF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

            @fiore i think we need an effective description of "corporate". is this a legal definition? does this disadvantage us compared to mysteriously funded nonprofit orgs?

            fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
            fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
            fiore@brain.worm.pink
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run "non-person" . this also includes corpo affiliations , ofc

            srazkvt@tech.lgbtS 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

              @fiore what about a service/tech support contract. is that allowed

              fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
              fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
              fiore@brain.worm.pink
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run that makes you corpo

              hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • fiore@brain.worm.pinkF fiore@brain.worm.pink

                step one in any possible reboot of the free software movement is always gonna be to refuse corporate sponsorship . always always .

                reia@linfan.moeR This user is from outside of this forum
                reia@linfan.moeR This user is from outside of this forum
                reia@linfan.moe
                wrote last edited by
                #8
                @fiore the problem with the " volunteers in their spare time" narrative kinda is that either the project gets abandoned because the developers are juggling a 60h/wk job, family, friends, and three to five free software project, or that the project gets abandoned because the developer who wanted to focus on the project full-time went homeless because they couldnt get the funding .

                its the same problem as with any art, and even research . it feels
                fiore@brain.worm.pinkF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • fiore@brain.worm.pinkF fiore@brain.worm.pink

                  @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run that makes you corpo

                  hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                  hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                  hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @fiore corpos that do genocide are distinctly different than corpos that don't to me

                  fiore@brain.worm.pinkF nagirin@sk.myxoz.netN 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

                    @fiore corpos that do genocide are distinctly different than corpos that don't to me

                    fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                    fiore@brain.worm.pink
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run all corpos will do genocide if they have a profit incentive in doing so

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

                      @fiore corpos that do genocide are distinctly different than corpos that don't to me

                      nagirin@sk.myxoz.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nagirin@sk.myxoz.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nagirin@sk.myxoz.net
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @fiore@brain.worm.pink the difference between a corporation that does an atrocity and the corporation that does not do an atrocity is not some moral betterness by the board of directors. Sure some small time businesses may genuinely be driven by a guy with a desire to do good. But that chafes and gnashes against the demanded logic of capitalism to seek profit above all else or be annahilated. Like fiore said those which do genocide are those which have a profit incentive to do so. And those who do not follow profit incentive like its their religion will eventually be fed on by vultures picking on their stagnating corpse.

                      hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • nagirin@sk.myxoz.netN nagirin@sk.myxoz.net

                        @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @fiore@brain.worm.pink the difference between a corporation that does an atrocity and the corporation that does not do an atrocity is not some moral betterness by the board of directors. Sure some small time businesses may genuinely be driven by a guy with a desire to do good. But that chafes and gnashes against the demanded logic of capitalism to seek profit above all else or be annahilated. Like fiore said those which do genocide are those which have a profit incentive to do so. And those who do not follow profit incentive like its their religion will eventually be fed on by vultures picking on their stagnating corpse.

                        hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @nagirin @fiore see my argument for boycotting https://circumstances.run/@hipsterelectron/116481397829630029

                        fiore@brain.worm.pinkF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • reia@linfan.moeR reia@linfan.moe
                          @fiore the problem with the " volunteers in their spare time" narrative kinda is that either the project gets abandoned because the developers are juggling a 60h/wk job, family, friends, and three to five free software project, or that the project gets abandoned because the developer who wanted to focus on the project full-time went homeless because they couldnt get the funding .

                          its the same problem as with any art, and even research . it feels
                          fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fiore@brain.worm.pink
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @reia@linfan.moe ermm those all seem like things a corpo would be worried about .. /j(id love to respond more seriously but im late to a dentist appointment rn i gtg weehhh)

                          fiore@brain.worm.pinkF 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          0
                          • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

                            @nagirin @fiore see my argument for boycotting https://circumstances.run/@hipsterelectron/116481397829630029

                            fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fiore@brain.worm.pink
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @nagirin@sk.myxoz.net boycotting is a tiny patch not a solution

                            hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • fiore@brain.worm.pinkF fiore@brain.worm.pink

                              @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @nagirin@sk.myxoz.net boycotting is a tiny patch not a solution

                              hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                              hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @fiore @nagirin i'm interested in codifying support for genocide and surveillance into a license cc @LGUG2Z

                              fiore@brain.worm.pinkF 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

                                @fiore @nagirin i'm interested in codifying support for genocide and surveillance into a license cc @LGUG2Z

                                fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fiore@brain.worm.pink
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @nagirin@sk.myxoz.net @LGUG2Z@hachyderm.io licenses mean very little to me

                                hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • fiore@brain.worm.pinkF fiore@brain.worm.pink

                                  @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @nagirin@sk.myxoz.net @LGUG2Z@hachyderm.io licenses mean very little to me

                                  hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @fiore @LGUG2Z @nagirin they are one way to define guarantees. how else can we do so? i also advocate for no-support resolutions which would be intransitive and alongside the code of conduct

                                  fiore@brain.worm.pinkF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

                                    @fiore @LGUG2Z @nagirin they are one way to define guarantees. how else can we do so? i also advocate for no-support resolutions which would be intransitive and alongside the code of conduct

                                    fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fiore@brain.worm.pink
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @LGUG2Z@hachyderm.io @nagirin@sk.myxoz.net licensing is a legal tool , and the law means very little to the corporations im trying to defend against

                                    nagirin@sk.myxoz.netN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • fiore@brain.worm.pinkF fiore@brain.worm.pink

                                      @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @LGUG2Z@hachyderm.io @nagirin@sk.myxoz.net licensing is a legal tool , and the law means very little to the corporations im trying to defend against

                                      nagirin@sk.myxoz.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nagirin@sk.myxoz.netN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nagirin@sk.myxoz.net
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @fiore@brain.worm.pink @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @LGUG2Z@hachyderm.io I'll add that by using the legal system specifically centred around treating corporations as individuals, you are scoring an own goal and playing by rules with disadvantage the goals of a free software movement.

                                      hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • nagirin@sk.myxoz.netN nagirin@sk.myxoz.net

                                        @fiore@brain.worm.pink @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @LGUG2Z@hachyderm.io I'll add that by using the legal system specifically centred around treating corporations as individuals, you are scoring an own goal and playing by rules with disadvantage the goals of a free software movement.

                                        hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hipsterelectron@circumstances.run
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @nagirin @fiore @LGUG2Z i attempted to focus on guarantees and described why and how license changes compliment over strategies. i like having guarantees codified

                                        fiore@brain.worm.pinkF 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • hipsterelectron@circumstances.runH hipsterelectron@circumstances.run

                                          @nagirin @fiore @LGUG2Z i attempted to focus on guarantees and described why and how license changes compliment over strategies. i like having guarantees codified

                                          fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fiore@brain.worm.pinkF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fiore@brain.worm.pink
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @hipsterelectron@circumstances.run @nagirin@sk.myxoz.net @LGUG2Z@hachyderm.io the fsf has failed to provide what we are seeking , and the fsf has produced some pretty darn good licenses . the reason this all went to shit is that licensing is not the way to move forward , it is not a weapon

                                          fiore@brain.worm.pinkF 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups