Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence."

So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
37 Posts 25 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mahryekuh@hachyderm.ioM mahryekuh@hachyderm.io

    @futurebird This is about ants, but it feels like a metaphor about neurodivergence.

    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.win
    wrote last edited by
    #19

    @mahryekuh

    I think that's part of it. Although what keeps me up at night is thinking about the ease with which ants will abandon a bad but popular path for a shorter more effective one.

    You will never have an ant who is saying "but this is the way my older sister went, you insult her memory by not using her path, she suffered so much" or "that ant who found the new shorter path thinks she's better than me, lets get rid of her and the path this is so embarrassing."

    I hope.

    renordquist@akademienl.socialR llewelly@sauropods.winL 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • thejessiekirk@ohai.socialT thejessiekirk@ohai.social

      @futurebird It's such a loaded term that I've found it difficult to discuss philosophically or scientifically, as like if I say species X is less intelligent than species Y, I'm insulting X.

      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
      burnitdown@beige.party
      wrote last edited by
      #20

      @futurebird @thejessiekirk it has no scientific definition because it is a pseudo-scientific term.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

        Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

        The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

        rbos@mastodon.novylen.netR This user is from outside of this forum
        rbos@mastodon.novylen.netR This user is from outside of this forum
        rbos@mastodon.novylen.net
        wrote last edited by
        #21

        @futurebird
        I relate to this ant.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

          @mahryekuh

          I think that's part of it. Although what keeps me up at night is thinking about the ease with which ants will abandon a bad but popular path for a shorter more effective one.

          You will never have an ant who is saying "but this is the way my older sister went, you insult her memory by not using her path, she suffered so much" or "that ant who found the new shorter path thinks she's better than me, lets get rid of her and the path this is so embarrassing."

          I hope.

          renordquist@akademienl.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          renordquist@akademienl.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          renordquist@akademienl.social
          wrote last edited by
          #22

          @futurebird @mahryekuh This is excellent... We should all follow the ant philosophy 🙂

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

            That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

            Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

            The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

            realn2s@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
            realn2s@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
            realn2s@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #23

            @futurebird
            The funny thing is that human innovation often starts with "the wrong way"

            E.g. the discovery of x-rays by the accidental x-ray of Wilhelm Röntgens wife Anna Bertha Ludwig's hand .

            Or the discovery of penicillin through an contaminated sample

            Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
            ryencode@mstdn.caR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

              So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

              Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

              * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
              * Is a billionaire intelligent?
              * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
              dahukanna@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #24

              @futurebird
              “intelligent” is an adjective categorizing/qualifying a noun & has meaning in an applied context: having or showing high level of intelligence.
              “Intelligence” is a noun, describing a specific ability to acquire knowledge & skills.
              So “intelligent intelligence” implies there is also “unintelligent intelligence” therefore the noun is spectral in nature like light- 😀😆😉😬.

              In general conversation it seems “Intelligence” is being conflated with “genius” I.e. exceptional intelligence.

              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                "Aphids are less intelligent than ants." I think even the ants and aphids are aware of this. But, what does that statement really mean?

                Aphids make very few observable interesting decisions.

                In contrast to this ants are constantly making decisions that are easy to observe. For some aphids, part of their survival strategy is to allow ants to make most of their decisions for them.

                Ants decide where they forage. Ants decide if they reproduce. Ants even regulate their digestive system.

                llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                llewelly@sauropods.win
                wrote last edited by
                #25

                @futurebird according to my memory, one method of observing aphid decisions involves attaching tiny gold wires to the aphids, and other tiny gold wires to the phloem tubes in the plant, so that when an aphid starts sucking sugar-rich fluid from the plant, an electrical circuit is completed, and when the aphid stops sucking fluid, the circuit is broken. Sounds fun! Or not for me, since I have terrible fine muscule motor control. (This came up in an old episode of arthro-pod .)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • realn2s@infosec.exchangeR realn2s@infosec.exchange

                  @futurebird
                  The funny thing is that human innovation often starts with "the wrong way"

                  E.g. the discovery of x-rays by the accidental x-ray of Wilhelm Röntgens wife Anna Bertha Ludwig's hand .

                  Or the discovery of penicillin through an contaminated sample

                  Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                  ryencode@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                  ryencode@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                  ryencode@mstdn.ca
                  wrote last edited by
                  #26

                  @realn2s @futurebird
                  The Heretics had not always been villains. Rather seen as essential Different Thinkers and Questioners of the accepted truths.
                  We've lost sight of the value in examining "truth" derived from tradition. (Not to be confused with rejection of one with blind accept of an alternative)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • threesigma@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                    threesigma@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                    threesigma@mastodon.online
                    wrote last edited by
                    #27

                    @FediThing @futurebird

                    Do they make interesting decisions? Arguably not: given any choice they will reliably do the thing that maximizes their power and wealth. I doubt any take risks for ethics or well-being of others.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                      @mahryekuh

                      I think that's part of it. Although what keeps me up at night is thinking about the ease with which ants will abandon a bad but popular path for a shorter more effective one.

                      You will never have an ant who is saying "but this is the way my older sister went, you insult her memory by not using her path, she suffered so much" or "that ant who found the new shorter path thinks she's better than me, lets get rid of her and the path this is so embarrassing."

                      I hope.

                      llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                      llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                      llewelly@sauropods.win
                      wrote last edited by
                      #28

                      @futurebird @mahryekuh avoiding bad attractors like cars, amazon (the online purchasing scam), cryptocurrency, and covid-19 has made me terribly unpopular. More importantly, it has cost me jobs, which has led to homelessness. And don't even get me started on how medical insurers and education systems pummel people who avoid bad attractors like cars with hatred and abuse. Nothing is more unamerican than avoiding bad attractors.

                      zdl@mstdn.socialZ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                        So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                        Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                        * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                        * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                        * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                        gclef@social.vivaldi.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gclef@social.vivaldi.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gclef@social.vivaldi.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #29

                        @futurebird

                        Intelligence is asking questions.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                          So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                          Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                          * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                          * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                          * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dalias@hachyderm.io
                          wrote last edited by
                          #30

                          @futurebird 1. No.
                          2. No.
                          3. Intelligence isn't an axis of measurement, it's a qualitative property. So no.

                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                            @futurebird 1. No.
                            2. No.
                            3. Intelligence isn't an axis of measurement, it's a qualitative property. So no.

                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #31

                            @futurebird Re: 1 & 2, a big part of intelligence is the ability to use reasoning processes to manage consequences. Neither a calculator nor a billionaire experiences consequences so neither can have intelligence.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dahukanna@mastodon.socialD dahukanna@mastodon.social

                              @futurebird
                              “intelligent” is an adjective categorizing/qualifying a noun & has meaning in an applied context: having or showing high level of intelligence.
                              “Intelligence” is a noun, describing a specific ability to acquire knowledge & skills.
                              So “intelligent intelligence” implies there is also “unintelligent intelligence” therefore the noun is spectral in nature like light- 😀😆😉😬.

                              In general conversation it seems “Intelligence” is being conflated with “genius” I.e. exceptional intelligence.

                              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dahukanna@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #32

                              @futurebird case in point- “unintelligent intelligence” == fiction

                              - https://mstdn.social/@david_colquhoun/116064390958883997

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

                                Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

                                The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

                                pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pizzademon@mastodon.online
                                wrote last edited by
                                #33

                                @futurebird https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/536961-the-reasonable-man-adapts-himself-to-the-world-the-unreasonable

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                  That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

                                  Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

                                  The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

                                  tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tartley@fosstodon.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tartley@fosstodon.org
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @futurebird I have always assumed this must be my role in society. 😁

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                    So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                                    Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                                    * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                                    * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                                    * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                                    datenwolf@chaos.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    datenwolf@chaos.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    datenwolf@chaos.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @futurebird

                                    For a very long time ( > 15 years) I'm holding the definition of intelligent being

                                    The capability for directed & deliberated action toward the goal of overcoming hitherto unknown and untrained for situations/problems with near-optimal effort.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • nigel_lake@mastodon.worldN nigel_lake@mastodon.world

                                      @futurebird For me, the line is between clever - someone who knows a lot of things, whether through exceptional memory or a great deal of study - and intelligent - someone who can understand new problems and solve them. Clever is fine for some tasks and hopeless for others. Intelligence is much more flexible - and can seek out the relevant knowledge they don't have.

                                      As for the technology equivalent, LLMs are a version of clever, generally minus the awareness of whether they are right or wrong!

                                      khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      khleedril@cyberplace.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #36

                                      @Nigel_Lake @futurebird I think you got them the wrong way around. Intelligent means you know lots of stuff (intelligence!), clever means you can work things out.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • llewelly@sauropods.winL llewelly@sauropods.win

                                        @futurebird @mahryekuh avoiding bad attractors like cars, amazon (the online purchasing scam), cryptocurrency, and covid-19 has made me terribly unpopular. More importantly, it has cost me jobs, which has led to homelessness. And don't even get me started on how medical insurers and education systems pummel people who avoid bad attractors like cars with hatred and abuse. Nothing is more unamerican than avoiding bad attractors.

                                        zdl@mstdn.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        zdl@mstdn.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        zdl@mstdn.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #37

                                        @llewelly @futurebird @mahryekuh I'm curious why you think online purchasing is a scam?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups