Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence."

So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
37 Posts 25 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

    It is staggering how many decisions ants manage given their size.

    Part of the ant strategy is to have enough ants, all making decisions that if some of them make bad decisions it won't matter much, someone will get it right. They are also very quick to follow other colony members who are having success. This is the famous "emergent" colony intelligence.

    If you watch leaf cutter ants there will always be one ant carrying the leaf in the wrong direction. But, eventually she gets turned around.

    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
    futurebird@sauropods.win
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

    Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

    The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

    futurebird@sauropods.winF mahryekuh@hachyderm.ioM rbos@mastodon.novylen.netR realn2s@infosec.exchangeR pizzademon@mastodon.onlineP 6 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

      That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

      Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

      The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

      futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
      futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
      futurebird@sauropods.win
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      There are these social media memes about how army ants sometimes can get trapped walking in a circle. A "death spiral" this is presented with a knowing head shake about the dangers of just following the crowd.

      This always annoys me since it takes extreme circumstances for this to happen to army ants. They have built in mechanisms to break such cycles and do so all the time...

      But when in a human built environment they may get trapped. There are no tempting distractions for "wrong way ants"

      futurebird@sauropods.winF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

        There are these social media memes about how army ants sometimes can get trapped walking in a circle. A "death spiral" this is presented with a knowing head shake about the dangers of just following the crowd.

        This always annoys me since it takes extreme circumstances for this to happen to army ants. They have built in mechanisms to break such cycles and do so all the time...

        But when in a human built environment they may get trapped. There are no tempting distractions for "wrong way ants"

        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
        futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
        futurebird@sauropods.win
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        As a participant in the human "death spiral" that is our current approach to things like climate change I find it hard to find fault with the ants.

        raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

          That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

          Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

          The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

          mahryekuh@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          mahryekuh@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          mahryekuh@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @futurebird This is about ants, but it feels like a metaphor about neurodivergence.

          evdhmn@ecoevo.socialE futurebird@sauropods.winF 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

            As a participant in the human "death spiral" that is our current approach to things like climate change I find it hard to find fault with the ants.

            raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
            raganwald@social.bau-ha.usR This user is from outside of this forum
            raganwald@social.bau-ha.us
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @futurebird When my children were young I told them to be proud of humanity: Humans are the most advanced form of life on Earth, according to every metric humans have devised to measure "advanced."

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mahryekuh@hachyderm.ioM mahryekuh@hachyderm.io

              @futurebird This is about ants, but it feels like a metaphor about neurodivergence.

              evdhmn@ecoevo.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
              evdhmn@ecoevo.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
              evdhmn@ecoevo.social
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @mahryekuh @futurebird
              I thought maybe I was cognitively biased I felt it too, could be both.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                ohne_sonne@potate.spaceO This user is from outside of this forum
                ohne_sonne@potate.spaceO This user is from outside of this forum
                ohne_sonne@potate.space
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @futurebird
                Using brain mass, the glial cell ratio, the average number of neurons/kg, and similar measures has always sounded to me like a strong collective confirmation bias, under which whatever metric is used must satisfy these preconceived assumptions: Einstein > humans > monkeys > dogs > cats > rats > chickens > insects > plants.

                This says a lot about how intelligence is perceived: a linear, vertical hierarchy of individuals used to enforce domination over people and other living beings.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • froge@social.glitched.systemsF froge@social.glitched.systems

                  @futurebird@sauropods.win no no it's much simpler than that, things I like are intelligent, and things I don't like are not!

                  this is only half a joke, honestly most of human history crudely boils down to this lol

                  burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                  burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                  burnitdown@beige.party
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @futurebird @froge not so much all of human history, but definitely the eugenics part.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mahryekuh@hachyderm.ioM mahryekuh@hachyderm.io

                    @futurebird This is about ants, but it feels like a metaphor about neurodivergence.

                    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                    futurebird@sauropods.winF This user is from outside of this forum
                    futurebird@sauropods.win
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @mahryekuh

                    I think that's part of it. Although what keeps me up at night is thinking about the ease with which ants will abandon a bad but popular path for a shorter more effective one.

                    You will never have an ant who is saying "but this is the way my older sister went, you insult her memory by not using her path, she suffered so much" or "that ant who found the new shorter path thinks she's better than me, lets get rid of her and the path this is so embarrassing."

                    I hope.

                    renordquist@akademienl.socialR llewelly@sauropods.winL 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • thejessiekirk@ohai.socialT thejessiekirk@ohai.social

                      @futurebird It's such a loaded term that I've found it difficult to discuss philosophically or scientifically, as like if I say species X is less intelligent than species Y, I'm insulting X.

                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                      burnitdown@beige.partyB This user is from outside of this forum
                      burnitdown@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @futurebird @thejessiekirk it has no scientific definition because it is a pseudo-scientific term.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                        That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

                        Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

                        The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

                        rbos@mastodon.novylen.netR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rbos@mastodon.novylen.netR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rbos@mastodon.novylen.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @futurebird
                        I relate to this ant.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                          @mahryekuh

                          I think that's part of it. Although what keeps me up at night is thinking about the ease with which ants will abandon a bad but popular path for a shorter more effective one.

                          You will never have an ant who is saying "but this is the way my older sister went, you insult her memory by not using her path, she suffered so much" or "that ant who found the new shorter path thinks she's better than me, lets get rid of her and the path this is so embarrassing."

                          I hope.

                          renordquist@akademienl.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          renordquist@akademienl.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          renordquist@akademienl.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @futurebird @mahryekuh This is excellent... We should all follow the ant philosophy 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                            That one ant going the "wrong way" isn't less intelligent than the rest. She's an essential part of the system.

                            Because sometimes that ant finds a shortcut. If she finds a shortcut her pheromone path, the passive evidence of her motion, the freshness of the leaf bit she delivers will attract more ants to her path. Quickly, without discussion or resentment, (cough cough) all of the ants switch to the new shorter path.

                            The 'wrong way ants' prevent the ants from being trapped in bad attractors.

                            realn2s@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                            realn2s@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                            realn2s@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @futurebird
                            The funny thing is that human innovation often starts with "the wrong way"

                            E.g. the discovery of x-rays by the accidental x-ray of Wilhelm Röntgens wife Anna Bertha Ludwig's hand .

                            Or the discovery of penicillin through an contaminated sample

                            Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                            ryencode@mstdn.caR 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                              So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                              Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                              * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                              * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                              * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dahukanna@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @futurebird
                              “intelligent” is an adjective categorizing/qualifying a noun & has meaning in an applied context: having or showing high level of intelligence.
                              “Intelligence” is a noun, describing a specific ability to acquire knowledge & skills.
                              So “intelligent intelligence” implies there is also “unintelligent intelligence” therefore the noun is spectral in nature like light- 😀😆😉😬.

                              In general conversation it seems “Intelligence” is being conflated with “genius” I.e. exceptional intelligence.

                              dahukanna@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                "Aphids are less intelligent than ants." I think even the ants and aphids are aware of this. But, what does that statement really mean?

                                Aphids make very few observable interesting decisions.

                                In contrast to this ants are constantly making decisions that are easy to observe. For some aphids, part of their survival strategy is to allow ants to make most of their decisions for them.

                                Ants decide where they forage. Ants decide if they reproduce. Ants even regulate their digestive system.

                                llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                                llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                                llewelly@sauropods.win
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @futurebird according to my memory, one method of observing aphid decisions involves attaching tiny gold wires to the aphids, and other tiny gold wires to the phloem tubes in the plant, so that when an aphid starts sucking sugar-rich fluid from the plant, an electrical circuit is completed, and when the aphid stops sucking fluid, the circuit is broken. Sounds fun! Or not for me, since I have terrible fine muscule motor control. (This came up in an old episode of arthro-pod .)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • realn2s@infosec.exchangeR realn2s@infosec.exchange

                                  @futurebird
                                  The funny thing is that human innovation often starts with "the wrong way"

                                  E.g. the discovery of x-rays by the accidental x-ray of Wilhelm Röntgens wife Anna Bertha Ludwig's hand .

                                  Or the discovery of penicillin through an contaminated sample

                                  Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                                  ryencode@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ryencode@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ryencode@mstdn.ca
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  @realn2s @futurebird
                                  The Heretics had not always been villains. Rather seen as essential Different Thinkers and Questioners of the accepted truths.
                                  We've lost sight of the value in examining "truth" derived from tradition. (Not to be confused with rejection of one with blind accept of an alternative)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • threesigma@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    threesigma@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    threesigma@mastodon.online
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    @FediThing @futurebird

                                    Do they make interesting decisions? Arguably not: given any choice they will reliably do the thing that maximizes their power and wealth. I doubt any take risks for ethics or well-being of others.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                      @mahryekuh

                                      I think that's part of it. Although what keeps me up at night is thinking about the ease with which ants will abandon a bad but popular path for a shorter more effective one.

                                      You will never have an ant who is saying "but this is the way my older sister went, you insult her memory by not using her path, she suffered so much" or "that ant who found the new shorter path thinks she's better than me, lets get rid of her and the path this is so embarrassing."

                                      I hope.

                                      llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      llewelly@sauropods.winL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      llewelly@sauropods.win
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @futurebird @mahryekuh avoiding bad attractors like cars, amazon (the online purchasing scam), cryptocurrency, and covid-19 has made me terribly unpopular. More importantly, it has cost me jobs, which has led to homelessness. And don't even get me started on how medical insurers and education systems pummel people who avoid bad attractors like cars with hatred and abuse. Nothing is more unamerican than avoiding bad attractors.

                                      zdl@mstdn.socialZ 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                        So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                                        Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                                        * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                                        * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                                        * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                                        gclef@social.vivaldi.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gclef@social.vivaldi.netG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gclef@social.vivaldi.net
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @futurebird

                                        Intelligence is asking questions.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • futurebird@sauropods.winF futurebird@sauropods.win

                                          So I often come back to the question of defining what we mean by "intelligence." It's pretty easy to get disgusted say it's not even worth trying to define because it is a word used in such inconsistent ways.

                                          Intelligence is a positive attribute that describes the decision making capacity and effectiveness.

                                          * Is a scientific calculator intelligent?
                                          * Is a billionaire intelligent?
                                          * Is the largest blue whale the most intelligent animal alive because it has the most brain mass?

                                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dalias@hachyderm.io
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #30

                                          @futurebird 1. No.
                                          2. No.
                                          3. Intelligence isn't an axis of measurement, it's a qualitative property. So no.

                                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups