sure this is all very bad for activitypub but this is truly amazing content
-
sure this is all very bad for activitypub but this is truly amazing content
-
sure this is all very bad for activitypub but this is truly amazing content
@laurenshof Lolololol
Evan gonna Evan -
sure this is all very bad for activitypub but this is truly amazing content
@laurenshof amazing
-
sure this is all very bad for activitypub but this is truly amazing content
@laurenshof “it’s ok if you don’t get it”
-
@laurenshof “it’s ok if you don’t get it”
@seachanger @laurenshof good (?) to see that he's being an asshole the same way to AP people and not only AT people…
-
@laurenshof “it’s ok if you don’t get it”
@seachanger saying that to CHRISTINE!?!
-
sure this is all very bad for activitypub but this is truly amazing content
@laurenshof
I have zero context for anything else but the saying's "Trust *but* verify" -
@seachanger saying that to CHRISTINE!?!
@laurenshof @seachanger
That he's the person in all of this that got the deal to write the book on ap is just so emblematic of the world we live in -
@laurenshof @seachanger
That he's the person in all of this that got the deal to write the book on ap is just so emblematic of the world we live in -
@seachanger @jenniferplusplus everything is gender, protocol edition
-
sure this is all very bad for activitypub but this is truly amazing content
It's not amazing but absolutely frightening when a key figure involved in the evolution of #ActivityPub demonstrates such a level of incompetence.
-
@jenniferplusplus @laurenshof hard to find a single person more embarrassingly to blame for the failures of mastodon to meet the moment
-
@laurenshof @seachanger
That he's the person in all of this that got the deal to write the book on ap is just so emblematic of the world we live inYeah so true. Hmm weren't there five co-authors of the AP spec?
-
@jenniferplusplus @laurenshof hard to find a single person more embarrassingly to blame for the failures of mastodon to meet the moment
Specifically for Mastodon's failures ... I can think of another candidate (everything is gender, implementation edition). But for AP and "the Fediverse" as a whole, I completely agree. And yet for some inexplicable reason people still listen to him!
-
@laurenshof “it’s ok if you don’t get it”
@seachanger @laurenshof ick!
-
Specifically for Mastodon's failures ... I can think of another candidate (everything is gender, implementation edition). But for AP and "the Fediverse" as a whole, I completely agree. And yet for some inexplicable reason people still listen to him!
@jdp23 @seachanger @laurenshof I assume you mean Eugen, and I want to give him all due credit for trying to do better. I wish he'd started earlier, and I wish it was going faster, but he's been doing the right kinds of things for some time
-
@jdp23 @seachanger @laurenshof I assume you mean Eugen, and I want to give him all due credit for trying to do better. I wish he'd started earlier, and I wish it was going faster, but he's been doing the right kinds of things for some time
My main point is that Eugen's had light-years more impact on Mastodon than Evan. Even with respect to AP's less-than-completely-positive (cough) impact on Mastodon, Eugen could have supported LitePub et al back in 2019ish -- or some other protocol change. And Eugen could have prioritized support for AP C2S. AP was in fact an improvement on OStatus when Mastodon adopted it in 2017, but it was Eugen's choice to do an EEE strategy and let it turn into a millstone.
I agree that Eugen 2026 has grown a lot in some ways from Eugen 2017 and even Eugen 2022 ... it's really hard for a founder to step away and pass the torch and he deserves a huge amount of credit for that. On the other hand local-only posts still aren't in Mastodon, admins still can't easily change the maximum post length, the documentation still talks about how allow-list federation is contrary to Mastodon's mission, I don't think he's ever changed his position on Meta's adoption of AP being "a huge victory for our cause" ... so I disagree on "he's been doing the right kinds of things".
-
@seachanger saying that to CHRISTINE!?!
@laurenshof@indieweb.social @seachanger@alaskan.social I genuinely don't know either of the people (or that third person, either) in that conversation, even by name. And yet I came away with a very clear sense of who to trust on technical issues.
And it was not "I talk about this in my book" guy.
-
My main point is that Eugen's had light-years more impact on Mastodon than Evan. Even with respect to AP's less-than-completely-positive (cough) impact on Mastodon, Eugen could have supported LitePub et al back in 2019ish -- or some other protocol change. And Eugen could have prioritized support for AP C2S. AP was in fact an improvement on OStatus when Mastodon adopted it in 2017, but it was Eugen's choice to do an EEE strategy and let it turn into a millstone.
I agree that Eugen 2026 has grown a lot in some ways from Eugen 2017 and even Eugen 2022 ... it's really hard for a founder to step away and pass the torch and he deserves a huge amount of credit for that. On the other hand local-only posts still aren't in Mastodon, admins still can't easily change the maximum post length, the documentation still talks about how allow-list federation is contrary to Mastodon's mission, I don't think he's ever changed his position on Meta's adoption of AP being "a huge victory for our cause" ... so I disagree on "he's been doing the right kinds of things".
@jdp23 @seachanger @laurenshof
Ok, well, I'd rather reinforce good behavior -
@jdp23 @seachanger @laurenshof
Ok, well, I'd rather reinforce good behavior@jenniferplusplus @jdp23 @laurenshof no doubt eugen has has an enormous practical impact on mastodon but Evan is just such a sparkling poster boy for the absolutely shittiest and most offputting part of this whole world
