Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.

The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
40 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place

    @nazokiyoubinbou @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis Still on OpenRC to this day. I've never once regretted not having systemd.

    nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social
    wrote last edited by
    #25

    @landelare @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis OpenRC sounds really promising as a really viable alternative. Just the basics with adherence to standards.

    landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

      The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.

      I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.

      But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.

      craignicol@glasgow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      craignicol@glasgow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      craignicol@glasgow.social
      wrote last edited by
      #26

      @sarahjamielewis given how many Linux machines have no human users for their entire lifecycle that does seem like a solution to a problem that will never exist.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

        The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.

        I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.

        But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.

        abhatem@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        abhatem@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        abhatem@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #27

        @sarahjamielewis as uncommon as this scenario may be, but I hate that it adds a barier for people who tinker with OSs and publish them online. I hate the feeling that it's assuming that OS development has to be centrilized so that those central entities can be held accountable, I'm affraid that it would set a precedent for adding regulating open source passion driven projects

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

          The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.

          I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.

          But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.

          maya_b@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          maya_b@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
          maya_b@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #28

          @sarahjamielewis

          there's also a line to be drawn - appliances often have a small rtos in them, I saw a firmware gig for a gaming mouse that used zephyr - so will we need age verification to make popcorn in a microwave? (my microwave already has a mandated child safety door lock which is super annoying)

          never mind that all these age verification mechanisms will be circumvented by any determined 12 yr old (or younger)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

            @sarahjamielewis

            It's a fairly binary option, comply with the law as written (as best as it can be interpreted anyway) or simply ignore it and see what happens.

            If those who are considered to be in violation are prepared to accept the consequences then they should do so.

            They would have my support for resisting a stupid and illogical law.

            systemd for all of its many faults is making a beginning for those who wish to build a framework. It's not mandatory. I don't see how any version of Linux could force this issue.

            For one, I am looking with interest at the Ageless Linux strategy which any version of Linux could adopt as a way to achieve malicious non-compliance.

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            slotos@toot.community
            wrote last edited by
            #29

            @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis I’m really annoyed how this is framed as „law compliance”.

            Law doesn’t require an init system to do this shit. Law could be satisfied by a separate service left to rot by everyone else on the planet.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

              The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.

              I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.

              But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.

              tuban_muzuru@ohai.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
              tuban_muzuru@ohai.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
              tuban_muzuru@ohai.social
              wrote last edited by
              #30

              @sarahjamielewis

              From Kagan's dissent in Paxton 2025, she argued that "age verification is never just about age; it is about the end of the anonymous digital life."

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.

                I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.

                But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.

                brianallbee@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                brianallbee@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                brianallbee@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #31

                @sarahjamielewis for whatever it might be worth, this particular effort looks to have been rolled back.

                So far.

                Link Preview Image
                Revert "userdb: add birthDate field to JSON user records (#40954)" by paramazo · Pull Request #41179 · systemd/systemd

                The systemd System and Service Manager . Contribute to systemd/systemd development by creating an account on GitHub.

                favicon

                GitHub (github.com)

                rosaaeterna@transfem.socialR dragonfi@social.jsteuernagel.deD 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social

                  @landelare @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis OpenRC sounds really promising as a really viable alternative. Just the basics with adherence to standards.

                  landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                  landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                  landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place
                  wrote last edited by
                  #32

                  @nazokiyoubinbou @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis OpenRC being called the alternative makes me feel extra old.

                  nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                    The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.

                    I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.

                    But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.

                    the_q@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    the_q@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    the_q@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #33

                    @sarahjamielewis I don't know if you're familiar with Steam. It requires a sort of age verification to view a video games page. You have to select a birth date to comply with regulations similar to what's happening here. Most folks just scroll down to 1945 or something insane allowing them to view the content and also screwing up any real data. I think this will be the compromise moving forward unless some sort of visual age verification or ID turns out to be a requirement.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • lexlohr@chaos.socialL lexlohr@chaos.social

                      @sarahjamielewis I think the best way to go is to make this a) fully optional and b) as loosely coupled to the system as possible. Next, we need to look into licensing to ensure that if we provide a system meant for the rest of the world w/o age verification, that we can get any legal costs back from users who used it in a country w/ age verification.

                      tuban_muzuru@ohai.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tuban_muzuru@ohai.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tuban_muzuru@ohai.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #34

                      @lexLohr @sarahjamielewis

                      Shifts liability to the user - and away from the OS

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sarahjamielewis@mastodon.socialS sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social

                        The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.

                        I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.

                        But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.

                        quoidian@mastodon.onlineQ This user is from outside of this forum
                        quoidian@mastodon.onlineQ This user is from outside of this forum
                        quoidian@mastodon.online
                        wrote last edited by
                        #35

                        @sarahjamielewis
                        I can't find myself objecting to a ~/YOB file.

                        johntimaeus@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • brianallbee@mastodon.socialB brianallbee@mastodon.social

                          @sarahjamielewis for whatever it might be worth, this particular effort looks to have been rolled back.

                          So far.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Revert "userdb: add birthDate field to JSON user records (#40954)" by paramazo · Pull Request #41179 · systemd/systemd

                          The systemd System and Service Manager . Contribute to systemd/systemd development by creating an account on GitHub.

                          favicon

                          GitHub (github.com)

                          rosaaeterna@transfem.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rosaaeterna@transfem.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rosaaeterna@transfem.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #36

                          @BrianAllbee@mastodon.social @sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social That PR looks to have been closed rather than merged, with Poettering seeming to be clear in his opinion that they're overreacting.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • brianallbee@mastodon.socialB brianallbee@mastodon.social

                            @sarahjamielewis for whatever it might be worth, this particular effort looks to have been rolled back.

                            So far.

                            Link Preview Image
                            Revert "userdb: add birthDate field to JSON user records (#40954)" by paramazo · Pull Request #41179 · systemd/systemd

                            The systemd System and Service Manager . Contribute to systemd/systemd development by creating an account on GitHub.

                            favicon

                            GitHub (github.com)

                            dragonfi@social.jsteuernagel.deD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dragonfi@social.jsteuernagel.deD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dragonfi@social.jsteuernagel.de
                            wrote last edited by
                            #37

                            @BrianAllbee @sarahjamielewis For me the merge of the revert seems closed, so despite it saying that "we agreed" it looks like the revert did not go trough.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place

                              @nazokiyoubinbou @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis OpenRC being called the alternative makes me feel extra old.

                              nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #38

                              @landelare @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis I mean... It's newer than Unix system five. 😆

                              simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social

                                @landelare @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis I mean... It's newer than Unix system five. 😆

                                simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #39

                                @nazokiyoubinbou @landelare @sarahjamielewis

                                Well I'm older that Unix 5, so I've not really got much to say with regard to all things retro 😂

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                • quoidian@mastodon.onlineQ quoidian@mastodon.online

                                  @sarahjamielewis
                                  I can't find myself objecting to a ~/YOB file.

                                  johntimaeus@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  johntimaeus@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  johntimaeus@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #40

                                  @quoidian @sarahjamielewis

                                  I can. That means that all apps need to be able to read from my home directory

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups