The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.
-
The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.
I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.
But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.
@sarahjamielewis given how many Linux machines have no human users for their entire lifecycle that does seem like a solution to a problem that will never exist.
-
The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.
I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.
But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.
@sarahjamielewis as uncommon as this scenario may be, but I hate that it adds a barier for people who tinker with OSs and publish them online. I hate the feeling that it's assuming that OS development has to be centrilized so that those central entities can be held accountable, I'm affraid that it would set a precedent for adding regulating open source passion driven projects
-
The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.
I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.
But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.
there's also a line to be drawn - appliances often have a small rtos in them, I saw a firmware gig for a gaming mouse that used zephyr - so will we need age verification to make popcorn in a microwave? (my microwave already has a mandated child safety door lock which is super annoying)
never mind that all these age verification mechanisms will be circumvented by any determined 12 yr old (or younger)
-
It's a fairly binary option, comply with the law as written (as best as it can be interpreted anyway) or simply ignore it and see what happens.
If those who are considered to be in violation are prepared to accept the consequences then they should do so.
They would have my support for resisting a stupid and illogical law.
systemd for all of its many faults is making a beginning for those who wish to build a framework. It's not mandatory. I don't see how any version of Linux could force this issue.
For one, I am looking with interest at the Ageless Linux strategy which any version of Linux could adopt as a way to achieve malicious non-compliance.
@simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis I’m really annoyed how this is framed as „law compliance”.
Law doesn’t require an init system to do this shit. Law could be satisfied by a separate service left to rot by everyone else on the planet.
-
The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.
I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.
But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.
From Kagan's dissent in Paxton 2025, she argued that "age verification is never just about age; it is about the end of the anonymous digital life."
-
The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.
I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.
But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.
@sarahjamielewis for whatever it might be worth, this particular effort looks to have been rolled back.
So far.
Revert "userdb: add birthDate field to JSON user records (#40954)" by paramazo · Pull Request #41179 · systemd/systemd
The systemd System and Service Manager . Contribute to systemd/systemd development by creating an account on GitHub.
GitHub (github.com)
-
@landelare @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis OpenRC sounds really promising as a really viable alternative. Just the basics with adherence to standards.
@nazokiyoubinbou @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis OpenRC being called the alternative makes me feel extra old.
-
The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.
I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.
But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.
@sarahjamielewis I don't know if you're familiar with Steam. It requires a sort of age verification to view a video games page. You have to select a birth date to comply with regulations similar to what's happening here. Most folks just scroll down to 1945 or something insane allowing them to view the content and also screwing up any real data. I think this will be the compromise moving forward unless some sort of visual age verification or ID turns out to be a requirement.
-
@sarahjamielewis I think the best way to go is to make this a) fully optional and b) as loosely coupled to the system as possible. Next, we need to look into licensing to ensure that if we provide a system meant for the rest of the world w/o age verification, that we can get any legal costs back from users who used it in a country w/ age verification.
Shifts liability to the user - and away from the OS
-
The extent to which core linux projects are laying the groundwork for age verification is very concerning.
I understand why some believe they are compelled to do so, and why others feel that it may be better to implement the most minimal conforming implementation in the hopes of fending off something worse.
But the line must be drawn such that no threat can obligate an OS to collect/store personal information - without that freedom, we face an uphill fight to protect general purpose computing.
@sarahjamielewis
I can't find myself objecting to a ~/YOB file. -
@sarahjamielewis for whatever it might be worth, this particular effort looks to have been rolled back.
So far.
Revert "userdb: add birthDate field to JSON user records (#40954)" by paramazo · Pull Request #41179 · systemd/systemd
The systemd System and Service Manager . Contribute to systemd/systemd development by creating an account on GitHub.
GitHub (github.com)
@BrianAllbee@mastodon.social @sarahjamielewis@mastodon.social That PR looks to have been closed rather than merged, with Poettering seeming to be clear in his opinion that they're overreacting.
-
@sarahjamielewis for whatever it might be worth, this particular effort looks to have been rolled back.
So far.
Revert "userdb: add birthDate field to JSON user records (#40954)" by paramazo · Pull Request #41179 · systemd/systemd
The systemd System and Service Manager . Contribute to systemd/systemd development by creating an account on GitHub.
GitHub (github.com)
@BrianAllbee @sarahjamielewis For me the merge of the revert seems closed, so despite it saying that "we agreed" it looks like the revert did not go trough.
-
@nazokiyoubinbou @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis OpenRC being called the alternative makes me feel extra old.
@landelare @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis I mean... It's newer than Unix system five.
-
@landelare @simonzerafa @sarahjamielewis I mean... It's newer than Unix system five.
@nazokiyoubinbou @landelare @sarahjamielewis
Well I'm older that Unix 5, so I've not really got much to say with regard to all things retro
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
@sarahjamielewis
I can't find myself objecting to a ~/YOB file.I can. That means that all apps need to be able to read from my home directory
