Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines.

My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
40 Posts 24 Posters 62 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mms@mastodon.bsd.cafeM mms@mastodon.bsd.cafe

    @mdione @minego TBF I'm thinking of caling it "Atntropic Claude" to accent that it's a product. Just like when I always write "Google Youtube' or "Microsoft GIthub" to show that it's a not a nice, indie service.

    minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    minego@pdx.social
    wrote last edited by
    #30

    @mms
    @mdione I like this

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

      My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

      Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

      I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

      I miss actual intelligence

      b3lt3r@mastodon.b3lt3r.comB This user is from outside of this forum
      b3lt3r@mastodon.b3lt3r.comB This user is from outside of this forum
      b3lt3r@mastodon.b3lt3r.com
      wrote last edited by
      #31

      @minego actual intelligence? You mean ai? ๐Ÿ˜Š

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

        My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

        Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

        I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

        I miss actual intelligence

        P This user is from outside of this forum
        P This user is from outside of this forum
        phosphenes@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #32

        @minego

        You are literally erasing my AI with your wrong pronouns.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • stveje@mstdn.socialS stveje@mstdn.social

          @minego The most disturbing thing to me is that, if we were to genuinely believe that these models were conscious individuals, then using them would be slavery and exploitation. Thankfully they're not conscious, of course, but the fact that so many people blithely use these models while pretending they are (or soon will be) conscious is still incredibly disturbing and says something about us.

          tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          tcatinreality@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #33

          @stveje @minego

          Yes, it says that a very large portion of humanity would happily be exploitative slavers if it were easy and acceptable enough.

          Of course, we already know this from centuries (millennia?) of history with actual human slavery.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT tjbutt58@infosec.exchange

            @minego my zoologist friends at uni were carefully instructed not to anthropomorphise animals. AI is even riskier, as we may start to care about it, and that will definitely be a selling point. ๐Ÿ’€

            janneke@todon.nlJ This user is from outside of this forum
            janneke@todon.nlJ This user is from outside of this forum
            janneke@todon.nl
            wrote last edited by
            #34

            @tjbutt58 @minego
            Yes, students are often still indoctrinated to view non-human animals as automatons, notwithstanding decades of research proving their feelings, emotions, thoughts and capabilities of tool creation, tool use, and planning.

            tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

              My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

              Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

              I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

              I miss actual intelligence

              quinoa0@mastodon.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quinoa0@mastodon.socialQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quinoa0@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #35

              @minego people actually expect us to refer to a text predictor which is nor intelligent nor even an actual robot with a human pronoun?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                My employer, like so many others, has been forcing the use of hallucination machines. During a meeting recently we were talking about using it, and I referred to it as "it".

                Obviously, it is proper English to do so. But, one coworker was shocked by this and asked me why I used that word. I calmly explained that it is a large very flawed statistical model and nothing more, so "it" is the appropriate word.

                I think that blew their mind. Their reaction was just silence.

                I miss actual intelligence

                msokolov@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                msokolov@fosstodon.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                msokolov@fosstodon.org
                wrote last edited by
                #36

                @minego what pronoun so they use for it!

                minego@pdx.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • msokolov@fosstodon.orgM msokolov@fosstodon.org

                  @minego what pronoun so they use for it!

                  minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  minego@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  minego@pdx.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #37

                  @msokolov They used he/him because that's what anthropic uses for claude.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • janneke@todon.nlJ janneke@todon.nl

                    @tjbutt58 @minego
                    Yes, students are often still indoctrinated to view non-human animals as automatons, notwithstanding decades of research proving their feelings, emotions, thoughts and capabilities of tool creation, tool use, and planning.

                    tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tjbutt58@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                    tjbutt58@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #38

                    @janneke @minego I think the point was not that animals were automata, but that, for instance, a cat behaves like a cat. There is a tendency to attribute human motivation to animal behaviour.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                    • minego@pdx.socialM minego@pdx.social

                      @jocafa
                      @nyquildotorg Yup.

                      I don't blame the person who did it. The companies pushing this use gendered names and pronouns. They want people to treat it like a person. The lies these companies are pushing is the problem.

                      urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                      urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                      urban_hermit@mstdn.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #39

                      @minego @jocafa @nyquildotorg
                      "Chad"

                      If they are going to act like the thing they pay $15/month for is as good as a real person, I think the best name for it is Chad.

                      "Chad made this mistake while I was working with him and while he agreed with me and apologized he just kept making the same mistake."

                      "Chad rewrote everything adding extra words, flowering it up. He turned it into total bullshit."

                      "Chad never admits he can't do something."

                      "Maybe it is time we talked about firing Chad."

                      nyquildotorg@gts.nyquil.orgN 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU urban_hermit@mstdn.social

                        @minego @jocafa @nyquildotorg
                        "Chad"

                        If they are going to act like the thing they pay $15/month for is as good as a real person, I think the best name for it is Chad.

                        "Chad made this mistake while I was working with him and while he agreed with me and apologized he just kept making the same mistake."

                        "Chad rewrote everything adding extra words, flowering it up. He turned it into total bullshit."

                        "Chad never admits he can't do something."

                        "Maybe it is time we talked about firing Chad."

                        nyquildotorg@gts.nyquil.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nyquildotorg@gts.nyquil.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nyquildotorg@gts.nyquil.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #40

                        @Urban_Hermit

                        The choice of Claude is interesting to me, because when written it sounds like a name a smartass might have, but when spoken it sounds like the name a dumbass might have. (Clod.)

                        @minego @jocafa

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups