Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Mastodon
  4. Following on from the @EUCommission Tech Sovereignty and Open Source Strategy (and Mastodon’s direct mention within it!) that was announced this week…

Following on from the @EUCommission Tech Sovereignty and Open Source Strategy (and Mastodon’s direct mention within it!) that was announced this week…

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Mastodon
socialwebfediverse
37 Posts 19 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

    @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

    you're not framing the problem correctly

    you've identified a terrible aspect of a subsystem that can be fixed at a later time, not a roadblock showstopper

    you are vibing on perfectionism and imagining your dubious objection somehow stands against the entire endeavour. it's concern trolling at best, whether you realize it or not

    you should look to see that this problem is fixed in incremental improvement, which is the only thing that exists in this world

    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
    wrote last edited by
    #13

    @benroyce

    I don't mean to troll. I am genuinely afraid. This looks like an intentional design choice, and I really *really* don't like where this is going.

    So far, these concerns have been ignored or dismissed by the developers of the Wallet. https://gitlab.opencode.de/bmi/eudi-wallet/wallet-development-documentation-public/-/work_items

    And because it is the gatekeeper to everything else, FOSS people will not even be able to *discuss* fixing this problem. All communication is cut off.

    @vladcampos @esanchis

    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mastodon@mastodon.socialM mastodon@mastodon.social

      Following the @EUCommission Tech Sovereignty and Open Source Strategy (and Mastodon’s direct mention within it!) announced this week…

      Our team is proud to have signed and contributed to the drafting of the European Social Stack Open Declaration alongside our peers in the #SocialWeb and #Fediverse: @anewsocial, @eurosky.social, @newsmast, Save Social, and @swf.

      We are a movement, and stronger together.

      Read the declaration, add your signature, and share: https://european.social/

      robincafolla@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
      robincafolla@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
      robincafolla@mastodon.ie
      wrote last edited by
      #14

      @Mastodon @EUCommission @anewsocial @eurosky.social @newsmast @swf signing up to the anti-privacy digital ID is pretty poor tbh.

      It will absolutely be used by authoritarian EU and non-EU states to limit access to information and spy on which websites people visited.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

        you're not framing the problem correctly

        you've identified a terrible aspect of a subsystem that can be fixed at a later time, not a roadblock showstopper

        you are vibing on perfectionism and imagining your dubious objection somehow stands against the entire endeavour. it's concern trolling at best, whether you realize it or not

        you should look to see that this problem is fixed in incremental improvement, which is the only thing that exists in this world

        dianshuo@mstdn.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        dianshuo@mstdn.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        dianshuo@mstdn.io
        wrote last edited by
        #15

        @benroyce @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis in fairness the EU does have a habit of inward focussed gates meaning interaction with neighbours is actually very bad. The irony being that free movement stops at the borders.

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

          @Mastodon @EUCommission

          “The development of a system for a distributed identity that can be used across networks and beyond (e.g. the European Digital ID Wallet) and protects personal data.”

          This reportedly requires the user to use a non-European non-open-source operating system and remote-attestation service.

          And this is the gatekeeper controlling access to everything else.

          And this will lock out users like me who are outside Europe.

          I love open source and this absolutely breaks my heart.

          avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
          avuko@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
          avuko@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #16

          @argv_minus_one @Mastodon @EUCommission

          Without taking away from the good things, I agree this is a really bad thing.

          @Gina has a solid grasp on the matter.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

            @benroyce

            I don't mean to troll. I am genuinely afraid. This looks like an intentional design choice, and I really *really* don't like where this is going.

            So far, these concerns have been ignored or dismissed by the developers of the Wallet. https://gitlab.opencode.de/bmi/eudi-wallet/wallet-development-documentation-public/-/work_items

            And because it is the gatekeeper to everything else, FOSS people will not even be able to *discuss* fixing this problem. All communication is cut off.

            @vladcampos @esanchis

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #17

            @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

            "I am genuinely afraid"

            well yes, fear is the mind killer. fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. arguments from fear always fail. so stop being afraid. that's you defeating yourself

            argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dianshuo@mstdn.ioD dianshuo@mstdn.io

              @benroyce @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis in fairness the EU does have a habit of inward focussed gates meaning interaction with neighbours is actually very bad. The irony being that free movement stops at the borders.

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              benroyce@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #18

              @dianshuo @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

              that's not a problem with europe. every single nation on the planet has border controls. your complaint is with the human condition, not europe

              dianshuo@mstdn.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E esanchis@mastodon.world

                @benroyce @argv_minus_one @vladcampos it was not intended to be trolling. I just can imagine many people not wanting to be limited to only Europe. It was a humble question.

                But as you also say, most probably it can be addressed later. I just wanted to know if this was already addressed at current state (I am sure many people did also think of this).

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #19

                @esanchis @argv_minus_one @vladcampos

                you're not trolling. i am responding to someone else. do you see their comment or is it hidden from you? if you can't see it and thus think i am responding to you that's a UI issue

                E sab@hostux.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                  @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

                  "I am genuinely afraid"

                  well yes, fear is the mind killer. fear is the little death that brings total obliteration. arguments from fear always fail. so stop being afraid. that's you defeating yourself

                  argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                  argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                  argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #20

                  @benroyce

                  I needed to hear that right now. Thank you.

                  I did find this https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/#currentproposal which suggests that Fedi/XMPP/FOSS will be exempt from the upcoming age-control requirements, and therefore the discussion can continue here. But I'm not sure if that document is outdated or if I'm misunderstanding.

                  If anyone could clarify, I would appreciate it.

                  @vladcampos @esanchis

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                    @esanchis @argv_minus_one @vladcampos

                    you're not trolling. i am responding to someone else. do you see their comment or is it hidden from you? if you can't see it and thus think i am responding to you that's a UI issue

                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    esanchis@mastodon.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #21

                    @benroyce @argv_minus_one @vladcampos you are right. I think now I see a different order in toots. Will try to check if it is a UI problem. Thanks!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                      @dianshuo @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

                      that's not a problem with europe. every single nation on the planet has border controls. your complaint is with the human condition, not europe

                      dianshuo@mstdn.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dianshuo@mstdn.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dianshuo@mstdn.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #22

                      @benroyce @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis no. It’s Europe. There is a policy problem and that has been there for a while.

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dianshuo@mstdn.ioD dianshuo@mstdn.io

                        @benroyce @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis no. It’s Europe. There is a policy problem and that has been there for a while.

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #23

                        @dianshuo @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

                        i can't process the assertion that border controls is a uniquely european issue

                        selective criticism is not a coherent basis

                        dianshuo@mstdn.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                          @dianshuo @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

                          i can't process the assertion that border controls is a uniquely european issue

                          selective criticism is not a coherent basis

                          dianshuo@mstdn.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dianshuo@mstdn.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dianshuo@mstdn.io
                          wrote last edited by
                          #24

                          @benroyce @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis I think you’ve made the leap that I’m talking about border controls. I’m talking about implementing policy regarding using the EU wallet as a gateway into the social stack being a barrier to access outside of the EU (in either direction). If you really want to conflate this then please do get US Customs and Border to ask for id when accessing the US social systems. We will thank you.

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mastodon@mastodon.socialM mastodon@mastodon.social

                            Following the @EUCommission Tech Sovereignty and Open Source Strategy (and Mastodon’s direct mention within it!) announced this week…

                            Our team is proud to have signed and contributed to the drafting of the European Social Stack Open Declaration alongside our peers in the #SocialWeb and #Fediverse: @anewsocial, @eurosky.social, @newsmast, Save Social, and @swf.

                            We are a movement, and stronger together.

                            Read the declaration, add your signature, and share: https://european.social/

                            alineblankertz@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alineblankertz@indieweb.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            alineblankertz@indieweb.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #25

                            @Mastodon
                            This obsession with “Europeanness” is really worrying. You suggest that European govt or business interference were not a threat to public-interest infrastructure. But they are.

                            YES to everything related to decentralisation and democratic principles. NO to the Europe-first bs (and the EU ID wallet of course).
                            @EUCommission @anewsocial @eurosky.social @newsmast @swf

                            ikuturso@mastodon.socialI victor@social.aftermemory.netV csolisr@hub.azkware.netC 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • dianshuo@mstdn.ioD dianshuo@mstdn.io

                              @benroyce @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis I think you’ve made the leap that I’m talking about border controls. I’m talking about implementing policy regarding using the EU wallet as a gateway into the social stack being a barrier to access outside of the EU (in either direction). If you really want to conflate this then please do get US Customs and Border to ask for id when accessing the US social systems. We will thank you.

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #26

                              @dianshuo @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

                              i still don't understand your complaint because you are still insisting that controls, border or not, are uniquely european in nature

                              just to be clear: i don't have a problem with your argument about controls, i have a problem with you asserting it is as a europe's problem alone

                              it's a human problem

                              if you want to say europe should go another way, ok

                              but don't form such an argument on the basis of "this is a problem only europe has"

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mastodon@mastodon.socialM mastodon@mastodon.social

                                Following the @EUCommission Tech Sovereignty and Open Source Strategy (and Mastodon’s direct mention within it!) announced this week…

                                Our team is proud to have signed and contributed to the drafting of the European Social Stack Open Declaration alongside our peers in the #SocialWeb and #Fediverse: @anewsocial, @eurosky.social, @newsmast, Save Social, and @swf.

                                We are a movement, and stronger together.

                                Read the declaration, add your signature, and share: https://european.social/

                                ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ikuturso@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #27

                                @Mastodon not a big fan of some of the language here. Atmosphere being labeled as "large-scale" or "planet-scale" like its proponents like to do is just pointless.

                                Bluesky is currently not significantly larger compared to the fediverse and it is shrinking... There's nothing particularly "large" about it. The platforms listed in this under Atmosphere are tiny compared to the fediverse since they want to avoid mentioning the only one with any adoption worth talking about in this context...

                                ikuturso@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                  @dianshuo @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

                                  i still don't understand your complaint because you are still insisting that controls, border or not, are uniquely european in nature

                                  just to be clear: i don't have a problem with your argument about controls, i have a problem with you asserting it is as a europe's problem alone

                                  it's a human problem

                                  if you want to say europe should go another way, ok

                                  but don't form such an argument on the basis of "this is a problem only europe has"

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #28

                                  @dianshuo @argv_minus_one @vladcampos @esanchis

                                  furthermore, i do not understand this baseless fear europe would set up a social stack and limit interaction with the outside world

                                  europe will not be isolating itself from the world. and merely because controls exist, in some form, does not mean europe is north korea

                                  it's fearmongering

                                  you are taking an aspect of incremental development, depicting it in an absurd, fearful light, and pretending it is a permanent hurdle

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ikuturso@mastodon.socialI ikuturso@mastodon.social

                                    @Mastodon not a big fan of some of the language here. Atmosphere being labeled as "large-scale" or "planet-scale" like its proponents like to do is just pointless.

                                    Bluesky is currently not significantly larger compared to the fediverse and it is shrinking... There's nothing particularly "large" about it. The platforms listed in this under Atmosphere are tiny compared to the fediverse since they want to avoid mentioning the only one with any adoption worth talking about in this context...

                                    ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ikuturso@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #29

                                    @Mastodon that said, joint efforts to solve shared issues can certainly be a good thing as long as care is taken that they're not helping the $100M VC gorilla across the pond more than these decentralization/European efforts...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • alineblankertz@indieweb.socialA alineblankertz@indieweb.social

                                      @Mastodon
                                      This obsession with “Europeanness” is really worrying. You suggest that European govt or business interference were not a threat to public-interest infrastructure. But they are.

                                      YES to everything related to decentralisation and democratic principles. NO to the Europe-first bs (and the EU ID wallet of course).
                                      @EUCommission @anewsocial @eurosky.social @newsmast @swf

                                      ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ikuturso@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ikuturso@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #30

                                      @alineblankertz there's a point to it in that it is useful to have EU law be what governs our use of these technologies but I agree that it can be harmful if it is the only thing people focus on since I'd say a truly open community-governed platform is much better than a proprietary one even if ran by Europeans.

                                      @Mastodon @EUCommission

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                      • alineblankertz@indieweb.socialA alineblankertz@indieweb.social

                                        @Mastodon
                                        This obsession with “Europeanness” is really worrying. You suggest that European govt or business interference were not a threat to public-interest infrastructure. But they are.

                                        YES to everything related to decentralisation and democratic principles. NO to the Europe-first bs (and the EU ID wallet of course).
                                        @EUCommission @anewsocial @eurosky.social @newsmast @swf

                                        victor@social.aftermemory.netV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        victor@social.aftermemory.netV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        victor@social.aftermemory.net
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #31

                                        @alineblankertz  @EUCommission @anewsocial  @newsmast @swf
                                        @rwg

                                        Could someone please explain, for dummies like me, what is goin on or the advantages of AT Protocol? Why is interesting for e. G.  @Mastodon? Just because of bluesky? Would not be easier that @eurosky.social just creates an ActivityPub instance? Or go for #publicactivityactivitypub

                                        From the website, I read: 1)controlled by a non profit organization and 2)🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺: Is the same EU trying to push #chatcontrol involved? I could not find if it is a W3C standard and everything seems quite confusing

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • alineblankertz@indieweb.socialA alineblankertz@indieweb.social

                                          @Mastodon
                                          This obsession with “Europeanness” is really worrying. You suggest that European govt or business interference were not a threat to public-interest infrastructure. But they are.

                                          YES to everything related to decentralisation and democratic principles. NO to the Europe-first bs (and the EU ID wallet of course).
                                          @EUCommission @anewsocial @eurosky.social @newsmast @swf

                                          csolisr@hub.azkware.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          csolisr@hub.azkware.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          csolisr@hub.azkware.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #32

                                          In that regard, this article covers most of the dangers of assuming an European infrastructure is, per se, a net bonus - unless specific measures are taken to preserve such infrastructure from a hostile takeover from a non-democratic movement within the EU, that infrastructure becomes an engine for such a movement to target its political opponents and suppress free speech. The ID wallet can potentially be used to disenfranchise political opponents, and block entire groups of people from access to information, even under the right hands - and far more so under the wrong ones.

                                          defenddemocracy.eu/eu-tech-dem…

                                          @alineblankertz @EUCommission @anewsocial @newsmast @Mastodon @eurosky.social

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups