Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Speaking personally, I was born in 1981 — nine years after NASA last went to the Moon.

Speaking personally, I was born in 1981 — nine years after NASA last went to the Moon.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
nasamoonartemisartemisii
8 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • linux@masto.aiL This user is from outside of this forum
    linux@masto.aiL This user is from outside of this forum
    linux@masto.ai
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    RE: https://masto.ai/@Linux/116359721225292245

    Speaking personally, I was born in 1981 — nine years after NASA last went to the Moon. I grew up hearing about it everywhere: in school, in the media, and from people who had actually seen it happen — long before I existed.

    It’s 2026. Fifty-four years have passed since NASA ventured beyond low-Earth orbit, and the live 4K stream looks no better than the upscaled 1972 footage. It’s a huge letdown.

    Artemis III has to be better.

    #Nasa #Moon #Artemis #ArtemisII

    richardnairn@mstdn.caR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • linux@masto.aiL linux@masto.ai

      RE: https://masto.ai/@Linux/116359721225292245

      Speaking personally, I was born in 1981 — nine years after NASA last went to the Moon. I grew up hearing about it everywhere: in school, in the media, and from people who had actually seen it happen — long before I existed.

      It’s 2026. Fifty-four years have passed since NASA ventured beyond low-Earth orbit, and the live 4K stream looks no better than the upscaled 1972 footage. It’s a huge letdown.

      Artemis III has to be better.

      #Nasa #Moon #Artemis #ArtemisII

      richardnairn@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
      richardnairn@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
      richardnairn@mstdn.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @Linux I suspect the post mission video will be better. There is still a bandwidth limit coming down with the deep space network due to the amount of telemetry required to support human space flight.

      linux@masto.aiL 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
      • richardnairn@mstdn.caR richardnairn@mstdn.ca

        @Linux I suspect the post mission video will be better. There is still a bandwidth limit coming down with the deep space network due to the amount of telemetry required to support human space flight.

        linux@masto.aiL This user is from outside of this forum
        linux@masto.aiL This user is from outside of this forum
        linux@masto.ai
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @RichardNairn

        NASA needs more than one data link.

        Redundancy could be beneficial. Not only would having more than one data link improve broadcasting to the world, but if something were to happen to the primary link, there would be another to fall back on.

        I truly believe we can broadcast from the Moon better than we did in 1972, 54 years ago.

        janeq@mastodon.socialJ richardnairn@mstdn.caR 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • linux@masto.aiL linux@masto.ai

          @RichardNairn

          NASA needs more than one data link.

          Redundancy could be beneficial. Not only would having more than one data link improve broadcasting to the world, but if something were to happen to the primary link, there would be another to fall back on.

          I truly believe we can broadcast from the Moon better than we did in 1972, 54 years ago.

          janeq@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          janeq@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          janeq@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @Linux @RichardNairn AV1 encoded stream at 4K@30 3Mbps VBR would probably take less bandwidth than this early 2000-webcam like mess of a stream we are currently presented with...

          linux@masto.aiL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • janeq@mastodon.socialJ janeq@mastodon.social

            @Linux @RichardNairn AV1 encoded stream at 4K@30 3Mbps VBR would probably take less bandwidth than this early 2000-webcam like mess of a stream we are currently presented with...

            linux@masto.aiL This user is from outside of this forum
            linux@masto.aiL This user is from outside of this forum
            linux@masto.ai
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @janeq @RichardNairn

            Seriously. NASA keeps claiming the images are less than ideal due to a lack of data. They’re also using a GoPro camera.

            1) Having additional data links would have been helpful. Redundancy would be better.

            2) You’re NASA — you could have done better than a GoPro.

            Food for thought for Artemis III in the future.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • linux@masto.aiL linux@masto.ai

              @RichardNairn

              NASA needs more than one data link.

              Redundancy could be beneficial. Not only would having more than one data link improve broadcasting to the world, but if something were to happen to the primary link, there would be another to fall back on.

              I truly believe we can broadcast from the Moon better than we did in 1972, 54 years ago.

              richardnairn@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
              richardnairn@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
              richardnairn@mstdn.ca
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @Linux They are using two of four deep space dishes in Canberra.

              linux@masto.aiL 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • richardnairn@mstdn.caR richardnairn@mstdn.ca

                @Linux They are using two of four deep space dishes in Canberra.

                linux@masto.aiL This user is from outside of this forum
                linux@masto.aiL This user is from outside of this forum
                linux@masto.ai
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @RichardNairn

                They need to do better.

                I waited 54 years for us to go beyond low-Earth orbit. My whole life, I grew up hearing how great the Moon was and how great NASA was. I defended NASA every time someone said we should defund them. It’s 2026 — 54 years later — we’re finally going back to the Moon, and they’re using a f-cking GoPro.

                They need to do better.

                richardnairn@mstdn.caR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • linux@masto.aiL linux@masto.ai

                  @RichardNairn

                  They need to do better.

                  I waited 54 years for us to go beyond low-Earth orbit. My whole life, I grew up hearing how great the Moon was and how great NASA was. I defended NASA every time someone said we should defund them. It’s 2026 — 54 years later — we’re finally going back to the Moon, and they’re using a f-cking GoPro.

                  They need to do better.

                  richardnairn@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                  richardnairn@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                  richardnairn@mstdn.ca
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @Linux They have a 260Mbs link down. Don’t underestimate how much data overall is being streamed back, not just the one camera they are using for broadcast.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups