Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It's kind of amazing how many veteran Linux greyhairs I've seen, downstream of the age-check-in-systemd decision, saying well I guess I need to get comfortable with a BSD now.

It's kind of amazing how many veteran Linux greyhairs I've seen, downstream of the age-check-in-systemd decision, saying well I guess I need to get comfortable with a BSD now.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
77 Posts 43 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rmi@cloudisland.nzR rmi@cloudisland.nz

    @hurt138 @mhoye I’m not looking for a fight here, but many people find voluntary compliance with authoritarianism distasteful, and feel that aspects like this should be resisted as much as possible. Sometimes resistance looks like marching in the street, and sometimes it looks like a fistful of sand in the gears, starting with “there is no standard place to store that data, you’ll have to think of something else.”

    There’s some additional complexity around the speed at which systemd rapidly replaced large parts of unix with an obviously terrible design, and because there is no easy outlet for that resentment, it sometimes surfaces in related subjects like this.

    Finally, the compliance-in-advance is intended to improve the “saleability” of linux by large corporations to other large corporations, but many contributors do not value the concept of “saleability” and are concerned that the platform’s direction is increasingly set by companies that do not share their social goals.

    hurt138@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    hurt138@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    hurt138@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #68

    @rmi @mhoye I can support all that.

    But for me personally I think having a spot is not a big deal and will continue with Linux.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mason@partychickens.netM mason@partychickens.net

      @mcc @mhoye Ugh. Alright. Yeah:

      Link Preview Image
      AI Coding Assistants — The Linux Kernel documentation

      favicon

      (docs.kernel.org)

      But we're not strictly out of the woods yet:

      "Core is investigating setting up a policy for LLM/AI usage (including but not limited to generating code). The result will be added to the Contributors Guide in the doc repository. AI can be useful for translations (which seems faster than doing the work manually), explaining long/obscure documents, tracking down bugs, or helping to understand large code bases. We currently tend to not use it to generate code because of license concerns. The discussion continues at the core session at BSDCan 2025 developer summit, and core is still collecting feedback and working on the policy."

      from https://www.freebsd.org/status/report-2025-04-2025-06/#_freebsd_core_team

      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mcc@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #69

      @mason @mhoye I have not researched this as much as I would like. I've been otherwise occupied this year. I think NetBSD was the one I was told was most anti LLM.

      mason@partychickens.netM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

        @mason @mhoye I have not researched this as much as I would like. I've been otherwise occupied this year. I think NetBSD was the one I was told was most anti LLM.

        mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
        mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
        mason@partychickens.net
        wrote last edited by
        #70

        @mcc @mhoye Yes, they've got a solid policy. I do wish they had better ZFS support, but it's a comfortable system anyway.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mason@partychickens.netM mason@partychickens.net

          @mhoye Not that the BSDs are in any way a bad option, but don't forget that it's entirely reasonable to use Debian without systemd. I'm doing it now.

          It's well-supported by active volunteers:

          Link Preview Image
          Debian -- Details of package sysvinit-core in trixie

          System-V-like init

          favicon

          (packages.debian.org)

          And there are other good options: Slackware and Alpine stand out. Gentoo is a bit heavy with its config syntax, but it's a super solid option.

          kaidenshi@exquisite.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kaidenshi@exquisite.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kaidenshi@exquisite.social
          wrote last edited by
          #71

          @mason @mhoye Void Linux is also a solid choice for a systemd-less Linux. It has a "less is more" feel to it like the BSDs and uses the runit init system. Its XBPS package system is simple to use and learn, and straightforward if you feel the need to roll your own packages.

          mason@partychickens.netM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • kaidenshi@exquisite.socialK kaidenshi@exquisite.social

            @mason @mhoye Void Linux is also a solid choice for a systemd-less Linux. It has a "less is more" feel to it like the BSDs and uses the runit init system. Its XBPS package system is simple to use and learn, and straightforward if you feel the need to roll your own packages.

            mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
            mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
            mason@partychickens.net
            wrote last edited by
            #72

            @kaidenshi @mhoye When I tried it, it seemed like a decent framework missing volunteers. For instance, IIRC there was a history function in xbps that was largely unpopulated.

            What killed Void for me was an inability to use a dependency system to let me manage binary kmods for ZFS, and vigorous opposition to the idea from their developers.

            I wish there were more answers for how to handle data integrity and self-healing without ZFS. Seems like a useful concept.

            kaidenshi@exquisite.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mason@partychickens.netM mason@partychickens.net

              @kaidenshi @mhoye When I tried it, it seemed like a decent framework missing volunteers. For instance, IIRC there was a history function in xbps that was largely unpopulated.

              What killed Void for me was an inability to use a dependency system to let me manage binary kmods for ZFS, and vigorous opposition to the idea from their developers.

              I wish there were more answers for how to handle data integrity and self-healing without ZFS. Seems like a useful concept.

              kaidenshi@exquisite.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              kaidenshi@exquisite.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              kaidenshi@exquisite.social
              wrote last edited by
              #73

              @mhoye @mason it’s a small and opinionated team for sure. My biggest issues with Void are the lack of full disk encryption in the installer (makes it sketchy for laptops when traveling) and the developers’ hard rule against browser forks making me have to build Librewolf myself or use a third party repo.

              Still, it’s the distro that I feel most at home in, though these days I run OpenBSD instead.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                navi@social.vlhl.dev
                wrote last edited by
                #74
                @lispi314 @mhoye @mcc @mason

                gentoo is currently also experimenting with gentoo/hurd, it's going well
                rooneymcnibnug@mastodon.socialR ryanprior@mastodon.socialR 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • navi@social.vlhl.devN navi@social.vlhl.dev
                  @lispi314 @mhoye @mcc @mason

                  gentoo is currently also experimenting with gentoo/hurd, it's going well
                  rooneymcnibnug@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rooneymcnibnug@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rooneymcnibnug@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #75

                  @navi @mhoye @mcc @mason @lispi314 I need to return to checking out Guix as more of a daily-driver (and Shepherd seems neat) but I'm too busy messing around in Plan 9 😅

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • navi@social.vlhl.devN navi@social.vlhl.dev
                    @lispi314 @mhoye @mcc @mason

                    gentoo is currently also experimenting with gentoo/hurd, it's going well
                    ryanprior@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ryanprior@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ryanprior@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #76

                    @navi @mhoye @mcc @mason @lispi314 hurd is going genai https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2026-02/msg00133.html

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                      It's kind of amazing how many veteran Linux greyhairs I've seen, downstream of the age-check-in-systemd decision, saying well I guess I need to get comfortable with a BSD now. Thirty plus years of deep-grooved Debian/RedHat muscle memory to a one, quietly tidying up and looking for the exits.

                      cazabon@mindly.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cazabon@mindly.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cazabon@mindly.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #77

                      @mhoye

                      I'm not leaving Linux, but I am leaving systemd. I've been in the process, slowly, for quite some time, but took some real concrete steps more recently. Then the systemd age field BS popped up and erased any remaining doubts I had.

                      So, unless Debian brings back a non-systemd option, I'll be switching the remainder of my machines to Devuan.

                      #Debian #Devuan

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups