Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks?

What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
93 Posts 44 Posters 58 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

    What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

    foldworks@mathstodon.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
    foldworks@mathstodon.xyzF This user is from outside of this forum
    foldworks@mathstodon.xyz
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @johncarlosbaez "Identical twins do not have the same fingerprints however, because even within the confines of the womb, the fetuses touch different parts of their environment, giving rise to small variations in their corresponding prints and thus making them unique." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin#IdenticalTwins

    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

      What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

      jannem@fosstodon.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jannem@fosstodon.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jannem@fosstodon.org
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @johncarlosbaez
      That we don't adjust our viewing distance of pictures according to the focal length. But we do adjust it according to the physical size of the image - but only imperfectly. Smaller images are viewed relatively further away than larger images.

      So the rule that ~50mm (45° FoV) is a "normal" focal length is only true for larger images. When viewed on smartphones the "normal" is more like 150mm or so.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

        What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

        isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
        isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
        isaackuo@spacey.space
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @johncarlosbaez The fourth Doctor always had a companion ending in "ah", except for the one story where he didn't have any companion at all (The Deadly Assassin).

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

          What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

          pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
          pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
          pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyz
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @johncarlosbaez I knew that auto manufacturers were forbidden from selling direct to consumers across much of the US thanks to lobbying from car dealerships, and that Tesla had fought this. But I only learned today that the workaround Tesla used in New Mexico was to sell from Indian reservations.

          bornach@vis.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyz

            @johncarlosbaez I knew that auto manufacturers were forbidden from selling direct to consumers across much of the US thanks to lobbying from car dealerships, and that Tesla had fought this. But I only learned today that the workaround Tesla used in New Mexico was to sell from Indian reservations.

            bornach@vis.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            bornach@vis.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            bornach@vis.social
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @pozorvlak @johncarlosbaez
            Learned this from https://youtu.be/GREaEG_0Xcw

            pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bornach@vis.socialB bornach@vis.social

              @pozorvlak @johncarlosbaez
              Learned this from https://youtu.be/GREaEG_0Xcw

              pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
              pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
              pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyz
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @bornach @johncarlosbaez me too!

              pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC This user is from outside of this forum
                chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.scienceC This user is from outside of this forum
                chemicaleyeguy@mstdn.science
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @johncarlosbaez Surprised to learn on #MayThe4th that *both* #GeorgeLucas and #StanleyKubrick were inspired by Canadian avant-garde collage filmmaker Arthur Lipsett, who was mentored and recommended to the National Film Board of #Canada by Group of Seven co-founder Arthur Lismer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Lipsett

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                  What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                  maxpool@mathstodon.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                  maxpool@mathstodon.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                  maxpool@mathstodon.xyz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @johncarlosbaez

                  Ancient Rome consumed lots of oil and they didn't reuse the large Dressel 20 amphora barrels. Monte Testaccio in Rome is a 'trash mountain' made of 53 million broken olive oil amphorae.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Monte Testaccio - Wikipedia

                  favicon

                  (en.wikipedia.org)

                  johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                    What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                    pigworker@types.plP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pigworker@types.plP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pigworker@types.pl
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    I learned that the free monad construction, which iterates any container to give you a term monad, is itself a monad on containers, and that its Kleisli arrows determine a class of recursive functions over tree-like data. Moreover, if someone offers to let you test such a function but withholds the Kleisli arrow which generated it, you can recover their secret by a pleasingly small amount of perturbation testing.

                    julesh@mathstodon.xyzJ pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                      What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                      glocq@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                      glocq@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                      glocq@mathstodon.xyz
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @johncarlosbaez There is no recorded case of schizophrenia in anyone congenitally blind. No one knows why.

                      tal@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyz

                        @bornach @johncarlosbaez me too!

                        pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @bornach @johncarlosbaez two literary ones:

                        - there's a Spanish equivalent of Shakespeare and I've never heard of him before today: https://mathstodon.xyz/@mjd/116532678297823850
                        - Ann Radcliffe's "The Mysteries of Udolpho", the book parodied by Jane Austen's "Northanger Abbey", has been continuously in print since 1794 and made Radcliffe £500. That's almost as much as Austen's total lifetime earnings of £684.

                        mjd@mathstodon.xyzM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                          What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                          maxpool@mathstodon.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                          maxpool@mathstodon.xyzM This user is from outside of this forum
                          maxpool@mathstodon.xyz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @johncarlosbaez

                          Maybe the most surprising fact I learned just few hours ago and wrote down is that hybrid car engines don't use Otto cycle. I never thought of that.

                          ma𝕏pool (@maxpool@mathstodon.xyz)

                          I just learned something new about hybrid cars: traditional gasoline cars with internal combustion engines using the Otto cycle are only about 25% efficient. Hybrids use a modified engine using the Atkinson cycle, which achieves roughly 40% efficiency, the Toyota Sienna in the video 41%. This increased thermal efficiency is the primary reason for their superior fuel economy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnUFH5GX_fI #cars #hybrids

                          favicon

                          Mathstodon (mathstodon.xyz)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                            What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                            rioda@mastodon.bida.imR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rioda@mastodon.bida.imR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rioda@mastodon.bida.im
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @johncarlosbaez a historical bit, for a change: I was very shocked to learn that the few italian places that have "Romano" in their name, derive that not from "Roma" and "romano" as one might expect, but from quite the opposite: during the long war between the (Roman) Empire and the Langobards, those places took name from the upper class of the Langobards, i.e. the arimanni; "Romano", in the names of these places, comes from arimanni, not from "Roma" and "Romano".

                            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                              What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                              bartoszmilewski@mathstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bartoszmilewski@mathstodon.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bartoszmilewski@mathstodon.xyz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @johncarlosbaez
                              Our worm-like ancestors were cyclops. When they decided to start swimming, the central eye squeezed out two side eyes and was itself reduced to the pineal gland that to this day regulates our circadian cycle.

                              Link Preview Image
                              Our modern vision evolved from an ancient one-eyed worm creature

                              The now extinct worm-like animal first lost paired eyes, then re-evolved them.

                              favicon

                              The Conversation (theconversation.com)

                              johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • pigworker@types.plP pigworker@types.pl

                                I learned that the free monad construction, which iterates any container to give you a term monad, is itself a monad on containers, and that its Kleisli arrows determine a class of recursive functions over tree-like data. Moreover, if someone offers to let you test such a function but withholds the Kleisli arrow which generated it, you can recover their secret by a pleasingly small amount of perturbation testing.

                                julesh@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                julesh@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                julesh@mathstodon.xyz
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @johncarlosbaez @pigworker I learned the same thing but the other way round (this is not a coincidence, we were in the same place when it happened). I knew this operation was a monad but didn't know it was the free monad monad

                                Said in terms of just polynomial functors, the operation p* defined as the least fixpoint of p*(y) = y + p(p*(y)) (that's the least fixpoint of an endofunctor on Poly) is both a monad -* on Poly, and also has the property that p* is a monad on Set for every p

                                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • pigworker@types.plP pigworker@types.pl

                                  I learned that the free monad construction, which iterates any container to give you a term monad, is itself a monad on containers, and that its Kleisli arrows determine a class of recursive functions over tree-like data. Moreover, if someone offers to let you test such a function but withholds the Kleisli arrow which generated it, you can recover their secret by a pleasingly small amount of perturbation testing.

                                  pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyzP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pozorvlak@mathstodon.xyz
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @pigworker @johncarlosbaez

                                  > I learned that the free monad construction, which iterates any container to give you a term monad, is itself a monad on containers,

                                  Makes sense - "free" things are usually left adjoint functors, and "forgetful . free" gives a monad.

                                  > and that its Kleisli arrows determine a class of recursive functions over tree-like data.

                                  Wait, what? A Kleisli arrow would be a natural transformation f -> Free g where f and g are endofunctors; how does that give you a recursive function? Co-Kleisli arrows, sure...

                                  > Moreover, if someone offers to let you test such a function but withholds the Kleisli arrow which generated it, you can recover their secret by a pleasingly small amount of perturbation testing.

                                  SORCERY

                                  pigworker@types.plP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                                    What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                                    magnus@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    magnus@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    magnus@mastodon.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @johncarlosbaez

                                    I was surprised to learn that there are small cleaner ants that clean bigger ants of a different species.

                                    If one insect wants help with cleaning, why choose another smaller insect of the same family? One could imagine so many other willing arthropods.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Magnus (@magnus@mastodon.world)

                                    Attached: 1 image Did ants learn this from cleaner fish? There are small ants that clean big ants without meeting any agression, just like small cleaner fish can clean sharks. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.73308

                                    favicon

                                    Mastodon (mastodon.world)

                                    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ saltywizard@beige.partyS 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                                      What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                                      arsatiki@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      arsatiki@wandering.shopA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      arsatiki@wandering.shop
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @johncarlosbaez India now has a larger share of new battery electric cars (out of all new cars sold) than USA

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                                        What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                                        lambo@openbiblio.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lambo@openbiblio.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lambo@openbiblio.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @johncarlosbaez That a certain crystal structure of some material can suddenly not be produced anymore, a so called "disappearing polymorphism". I learned this from a recent episode of the "Veritasium" YouTube series. I was stunned, I still am. It seems we still do not really know how this happens. It is being hypothesized that a very tiny crystal is enough to "infect" the material to the effect of losing its polymorphism. There's also a very nice Wikipedia article about this.

                                        lambo@openbiblio.socialL johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                                          What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                                          pait@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pait@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pait@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @johncarlosbaez That of the heat the human body loses, 50% is by radiation.

                                          Then 30% by convection, and 20% by evaporation of sweat, the latter being highly variable. Very little by conduction, unless the person is immersed in water.

                                          I did not think radiation would amount to that much.

                                          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups