Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. We'll have boots on the ground by the end of April.

We'll have boots on the ground by the end of April.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
8 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sjvn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sjvn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sjvn@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    We'll have boots on the ground by the end of April.

    reuters.com

    favicon

    (www.reuters.com)

    lasombra_br@mas.toL aakl@infosec.exchangeA 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • sjvn@mastodon.socialS sjvn@mastodon.social

      We'll have boots on the ground by the end of April.

      reuters.com

      favicon

      (www.reuters.com)

      lasombra_br@mas.toL This user is from outside of this forum
      lasombra_br@mas.toL This user is from outside of this forum
      lasombra_br@mas.to
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @sjvn jfc

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sjvn@mastodon.socialS sjvn@mastodon.social

        We'll have boots on the ground by the end of April.

        reuters.com

        favicon

        (www.reuters.com)

        aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
        aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
        aakl@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @sjvn So we're occupying the oil, basically, and installing another CIA-friendly shah? Makes sense. Who cares about precedent?

        sjvn@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • aakl@infosec.exchangeA aakl@infosec.exchange

          @sjvn So we're occupying the oil, basically, and installing another CIA-friendly shah? Makes sense. Who cares about precedent?

          sjvn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sjvn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sjvn@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @AAKL Nah, that's way too much for Trump to do. I expect we'll try to occupy the Iranian shores of the Straits of Hozmuz and Kharg Island--and I also expect it will be a bloody disaster.

          aakl@infosec.exchangeA P 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • sjvn@mastodon.socialS sjvn@mastodon.social

            @AAKL Nah, that's way too much for Trump to do. I expect we'll try to occupy the Iranian shores of the Straits of Hozmuz and Kharg Island--and I also expect it will be a bloody disaster.

            aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
            aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
            aakl@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @sjvn Interesting, assuming he's the one controlling the show, which he isn't. But this also assumes Iran hasn't mined everything. There's a precedent to this: when Saddam Hussein set the oil fields on fire to slow the advance of U.S. forces.

            aakl@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • aakl@infosec.exchangeA aakl@infosec.exchange

              @sjvn Interesting, assuming he's the one controlling the show, which he isn't. But this also assumes Iran hasn't mined everything. There's a precedent to this: when Saddam Hussein set the oil fields on fire to slow the advance of U.S. forces.

              aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              aakl@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @sjvn But I would argue, after seeing today's news, that the plan is to control the Straight or to put it under U.S. or international control.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
              • sjvn@mastodon.socialS sjvn@mastodon.social

                @AAKL Nah, that's way too much for Trump to do. I expect we'll try to occupy the Iranian shores of the Straits of Hozmuz and Kharg Island--and I also expect it will be a bloody disaster.

                P This user is from outside of this forum
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                phosphenes@glasgow.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @sjvn @AAKL

                They might take the shore, but they'll be stuck between water and a mountain range, full of nooks and crannies to hide drone bases.

                If US troops don't want to be sitting ducks for drone attacks, they'll have to charge up a mountain to secure more territory inland. Charging up a mountain does not have an encouraging history.

                aakl@infosec.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P phosphenes@glasgow.social

                  @sjvn @AAKL

                  They might take the shore, but they'll be stuck between water and a mountain range, full of nooks and crannies to hide drone bases.

                  If US troops don't want to be sitting ducks for drone attacks, they'll have to charge up a mountain to secure more territory inland. Charging up a mountain does not have an encouraging history.

                  aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                  aakl@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @Phosphenes @sjvn they might isolate the Straight and put it under U.S. control. Risky, but potentially crippling for Iran.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups