Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks?

What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
93 Posts 44 Posters 58 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

    @julesh @pigworker - I don't even know what a "container" is. It's my own fault. There's this repository of computer sciency category theory terminology that's different from the mathy category theory terminology, and I've never been tempted to explore it. There must be something about it that repulses me. I guess my love of math fizzles out when it starts getting too close to computer science. I apologize.

    eigil@mathstodon.xyzE This user is from outside of this forum
    eigil@mathstodon.xyzE This user is from outside of this forum
    eigil@mathstodon.xyz
    wrote last edited by
    #76

    @johncarlosbaez @julesh @pigworker Mathematicians tend to call containers "polynomial functors". David Spivak has written a lot about them under this name.

    pigworker@types.plP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • eigil@mathstodon.xyzE eigil@mathstodon.xyz

      @johncarlosbaez @julesh @pigworker Mathematicians tend to call containers "polynomial functors". David Spivak has written a lot about them under this name.

      pigworker@types.plP This user is from outside of this forum
      pigworker@types.plP This user is from outside of this forum
      pigworker@types.pl
      wrote last edited by
      #77

      @eigil True. I'm a touch old-fashioned in this respect. I note that renaming all the things is the number one strategy when it comes to ignoring prior art. @johncarlosbaez @julesh

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

        @foldworks - special relativity manages to make good use of a story involving *both* twins and something akin to time travel. The Twin (Non)Paradox.

        forrcaho@hachyderm.ioF This user is from outside of this forum
        forrcaho@hachyderm.ioF This user is from outside of this forum
        forrcaho@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #78

        @johncarlosbaez @foldworks well akSHUallY I think you mean "general relativity" because only non-inertial reference frames could lead to the twins being different ages when reunited.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • thmprover@mathstodon.xyzT thmprover@mathstodon.xyz

          @johncarlosbaez @pschwahn I heard this in chemistry class in school. Well, "distilled water is not for drinking" was the rule, the justification was that it lacked some of the essential stuff found in tapwater.

          Presumably, it was also to prevent students from drinking the distilled water, which parents donated to the chemistry class.

          forrcaho@hachyderm.ioF This user is from outside of this forum
          forrcaho@hachyderm.ioF This user is from outside of this forum
          forrcaho@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #79

          @thmprover @johncarlosbaez @pschwahn

          The reason I heard is that it reverses the direction of osmosis in your gut, leaching nutrients from your body instead of distributing them.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

            What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
            wrote last edited by
            #80

            Here's my big recent surprise: the number

            F = (2221564096 + 283748 sqrt(462)) / 491993569

            plays a fundamental role in number theory!

            For any irrational x, we define its 'Lagrange number' to be the supremum of c such that

            |(p/q) - x| < 1/cq²

            has infinitely many solutions for rationals p/q. So, the bigger the Lagrange number is, the easier x is to approximate by rational numbers. Quite famously, the golden ratio has the smallest possible Lagrange number, namely √5.

            Here's the shocking fact: every real number ≥ F is a Lagrange number, and F is the smallest number with this property!

            F is called 'Freiman's constant', because he proved this fact. His proof is 100 pages, and I don't want to read it... but some people have.

            There's a lot more crazy stuff about the set of all Lagrange numbers. A tiny bit is here:

            Link Preview Image
            Markov spectrum - Wikipedia

            favicon

            (en.wikipedia.org)

            Link Preview Image
            dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyzD ianagol@mathstodon.xyzI 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            0
            • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

              Here's my big recent surprise: the number

              F = (2221564096 + 283748 sqrt(462)) / 491993569

              plays a fundamental role in number theory!

              For any irrational x, we define its 'Lagrange number' to be the supremum of c such that

              |(p/q) - x| < 1/cq²

              has infinitely many solutions for rationals p/q. So, the bigger the Lagrange number is, the easier x is to approximate by rational numbers. Quite famously, the golden ratio has the smallest possible Lagrange number, namely √5.

              Here's the shocking fact: every real number ≥ F is a Lagrange number, and F is the smallest number with this property!

              F is called 'Freiman's constant', because he proved this fact. His proof is 100 pages, and I don't want to read it... but some people have.

              There's a lot more crazy stuff about the set of all Lagrange numbers. A tiny bit is here:

              Link Preview Image
              Markov spectrum - Wikipedia

              favicon

              (en.wikipedia.org)

              Link Preview Image
              dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
              dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
              dougmerritt@mathstodon.xyz
              wrote last edited by
              #81

              @johncarlosbaez
              Somehow I missed this in the past. It's believable, but not particularly intuitive.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                jer_gib@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jer_gib@functional.cafeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jer_gib@functional.cafe
                wrote last edited by
                #82

                @johncarlosbaez I learned in Korea recently that North Korea is much more worried about the influence of K-Culture (music, drama, etc) than about military interventions or poverty. And that (South) Korea is the number one per capita consumer of garlic.

                johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                  Here's my big recent surprise: the number

                  F = (2221564096 + 283748 sqrt(462)) / 491993569

                  plays a fundamental role in number theory!

                  For any irrational x, we define its 'Lagrange number' to be the supremum of c such that

                  |(p/q) - x| < 1/cq²

                  has infinitely many solutions for rationals p/q. So, the bigger the Lagrange number is, the easier x is to approximate by rational numbers. Quite famously, the golden ratio has the smallest possible Lagrange number, namely √5.

                  Here's the shocking fact: every real number ≥ F is a Lagrange number, and F is the smallest number with this property!

                  F is called 'Freiman's constant', because he proved this fact. His proof is 100 pages, and I don't want to read it... but some people have.

                  There's a lot more crazy stuff about the set of all Lagrange numbers. A tiny bit is here:

                  Link Preview Image
                  Markov spectrum - Wikipedia

                  favicon

                  (en.wikipedia.org)

                  Link Preview Image
                  ianagol@mathstodon.xyzI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ianagol@mathstodon.xyzI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ianagol@mathstodon.xyz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #83

                  @johncarlosbaez It looks like the continued fraction expansion of the Friedman constant has period 66754.

                  Link Preview Image
                  Simple continued fraction of Freiman's constant

                  The quadratic irrational $\frac{2221564096+283748\sqrt{462}}{491993569}$ is known as Freiman's constant and arises in the theory of continued fractions. I'm curious as to its simple continued frac...

                  favicon

                  MathOverflow (mathoverflow.net)

                  It would be nice if there is a geometric interpretation of this constant.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                    @saltywizard - I feel there should be YouTube videos about this....

                    @Lambo

                    lambo@openbiblio.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lambo@openbiblio.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lambo@openbiblio.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #84

                    @johncarlosbaez @saltywizard
                    Shhh don't tell anyone yet, but soon we will run a public experimental instance of @peertube at @tibhannover , inviting researchers to publish explain videos about virtually everything, spreading those right here on the Fediverse... So please keep your good ideas in mind! (TIB - same place where we run the full backup of arXiv etc)

                    johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                      What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                      normalmode@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      normalmode@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      normalmode@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #85

                      @johncarlosbaez Stretching the “couple of weeks” timeframe a bit, but I haven’t been able to stop thinking about the first paragraph of this article:

                      Link Preview Image
                      Katherine Rundell · Consider the Greenland Shark

                      I am glad not to be a Greenland shark; I don’t have enough thoughts to fill five hundred years. But I find the very...

                      favicon

                      London Review of Books (www.lrb.co.uk)

                      johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jer_gib@functional.cafeJ jer_gib@functional.cafe

                        @johncarlosbaez I learned in Korea recently that North Korea is much more worried about the influence of K-Culture (music, drama, etc) than about military interventions or poverty. And that (South) Korea is the number one per capita consumer of garlic.

                        johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #86

                        @jer_gib - both surprising! I wonder if the North Koreans would eat just as much garlic if they could afford it.

                        liamoc@types.plL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • normalmode@mastodon.socialN normalmode@mastodon.social

                          @johncarlosbaez Stretching the “couple of weeks” timeframe a bit, but I haven’t been able to stop thinking about the first paragraph of this article:

                          Link Preview Image
                          Katherine Rundell · Consider the Greenland Shark

                          I am glad not to be a Greenland shark; I don’t have enough thoughts to fill five hundred years. But I find the very...

                          favicon

                          London Review of Books (www.lrb.co.uk)

                          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #87

                          @normalmode - Wow! For those who don't click:

                          "In​ 1606 a devastating pestilence swept through London; the dying were boarded up in their homes with their families, and a decree went out that the theatres, the bear-baiting yards and the brothels be closed. It was then that Shakespeare wrote one of his very few references to the plague, catching at our precarity: ‘The dead man’s knell/Is there scarce asked for who, and good men’s lives/Expire before the flowers in their caps/Dying or ere they sicken.’ As he wrote, a Greenland shark who is still alive today swam untroubled through the waters of the northern seas. Its parents would have been old enough to have lived alongside Dante; its great-great-grandparents alongside Julius Caesar. For thousands of years Greenland sharks have swum in silence, as above them the world has burned, rebuilt, burned again."

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • lambo@openbiblio.socialL lambo@openbiblio.social

                            @johncarlosbaez @saltywizard
                            Shhh don't tell anyone yet, but soon we will run a public experimental instance of @peertube at @tibhannover , inviting researchers to publish explain videos about virtually everything, spreading those right here on the Fediverse... So please keep your good ideas in mind! (TIB - same place where we run the full backup of arXiv etc)

                            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
                            wrote last edited by
                            #88

                            @Lambo - I like this idea a lot!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                              @jer_gib - both surprising! I wonder if the North Koreans would eat just as much garlic if they could afford it.

                              liamoc@types.plL This user is from outside of this forum
                              liamoc@types.plL This user is from outside of this forum
                              liamoc@types.pl
                              wrote last edited by
                              #89

                              @johncarlosbaez @jer_gib north korean recipes actually tend to be less heavy on the garlic, although whether this predates their food shortages I'm not sure. I suspect it does though, and even a well-fed NK would not use as much, because the really famous strong-flavoured Korean food is more from southern regions like Jeolla-do.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • saltywizard@beige.partyS saltywizard@beige.party

                                @johncarlosbaez

                                @Lambo got here first with my top fact, so i'll go with this one:

                                transit operators in the u.s. are not authorized to question the pedigree of your 'service animal.'

                                as long as you identify the animal as such, you are permitted to bring it on the bus.

                                *any* animal.

                                irenetherogue@beige.partyI This user is from outside of this forum
                                irenetherogue@beige.partyI This user is from outside of this forum
                                irenetherogue@beige.party
                                wrote last edited by
                                #90

                                @saltywizard @johncarlosbaez this is deeply misleading and materially harmful to legitimate service animal handlers. Business owners, public transit operators etc are legally allowed by federal law to ask "is that a service animal" and "what tasks has the animal been trained to perform" and they are allowed to deny access to animals that pose a threat or disruption to normal operations regardless of supposed certification or training. What animals are allowed to be used in public spaces as service animals varies somewhat by state. But "pedigree" matters not at all and is not germaine to an animal's service as an assistance animal in the same way that businesses cannot deny access to wheelchair users based on the manufacturer of their chairs. Proprietors of public spaces cannot say "your cane/chair is homemade so you cant use it in here". But if the assistive device is causing damage or other disruptions, the user can legally be asked to take it outside. Do better by the disabled than to spread harmful misinformarion based on shitty clickbait. @Lambo

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                                  What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                                  dpiponi@mathstodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dpiponi@mathstodon.xyzD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dpiponi@mathstodon.xyz
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #91

                                  @johncarlosbaez That there are unified formalisms for describing hybrids of reversible (eg. Hamiltonian) dynamics and irreversible dynamics (eg. friction) in which the role of energy (for the former) and entropy (for the latter) are formally very similar.

                                  I'm not sure whether this is something deep or just a bit of bookkeeping for people writing simulations with the "entropy" being a useful fiction.

                                  Eg. the metriplectic and GENERIC formalisms.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  GENERIC formalism - Wikipedia

                                  favicon

                                  (en.wikipedia.org)

                                  Anyway, you asked, so...

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyzJ johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz

                                    What's the most surprising fact you've learned in the last couple of weeks? I don't mind if it's quite technical. I just want to hear what you folks are being surprised by!

                                    penguin42@mastodon.org.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    penguin42@mastodon.org.ukP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    penguin42@mastodon.org.uk
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #92

                                    @johncarlosbaez Chromosomes often get knots in; and there are enzymes that among other things, unknot them.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Topoisomerase - Wikipedia

                                    favicon

                                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pschwahn@mathstodon.xyzP pschwahn@mathstodon.xyz

                                      @johncarlosbaez That distilled water is completely safe to drink (contrary to what I learned in school)!

                                      tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tpfto@mathstodon.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tpfto@mathstodon.xyz
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #93

                                      @pschwahn @johncarlosbaez (putting on my chemist's hat) drinking distilled water is completely fine (and the osmosis thing mentioned in another response is utter bunk; by the time it's gone down the hatch, it would have some stuff dissolved in it that makes it less hypotonic). It's just that distilled water doesn't really taste all that good; it's the dissolved minerals and gases that make water tasty. (Personally, I find it slightly bitter.)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups