Hey @EUCommission have you considered just like, buying Mozilla and making Firefox the sovereign EU browser?
-
Hey @EUCommission have you considered just like, buying Mozilla and making Firefox the sovereign EU browser?
Or even just funding a non-profit to maintain an EU fork which does things like respect EU laws and regulations
Think about it
@eniko @EUCommission honestly that would be pretty cool
-
@eniko @EUCommission (coughs politely) LibreWolf (cough)
-
@anthrazit don't think chrome in a different jacket buys a lot of sovereignty
@eniko @anthrazit you should maybe check on that https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-browser-vs-google-chrome/
-
Hey @EUCommission have you considered just like, buying Mozilla and making Firefox the sovereign EU browser?
Or even just funding a non-profit to maintain an EU fork which does things like respect EU laws and regulations
Think about it
@eniko @EUCommission the name EuroFox is right there
-
@eniko @anthrazit you should maybe check on that https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-browser-vs-google-chrome/
Great link, thanks a lot.
-
@Brokar @eniko @EUCommission How do you feel about DuckDuckGo, which is the browser I use?
@connynasch @Brokar @eniko @EUCommission Nutz lieber Firefox Klar. Firefox Focus!
-
Hey @EUCommission have you considered just like, buying Mozilla and making Firefox the sovereign EU browser?
Or even just funding a non-profit to maintain an EU fork which does things like respect EU laws and regulations
Think about it
@eniko @EUCommission Mullvad Browser ( and VPN )
-
@eniko @anthrazit you should maybe check on that https://vivaldi.com/blog/vivaldi-browser-vs-google-chrome/
@flyingpenguin @eniko @anthrazit
1. so again, closed source except the google controlled part.
2. these three parts are not equal. google controlling the engine gives them a lot of control over the implementation of web standards -- and not least, as we've seen with the manifest v2 deprecation, over what kind of browser extensions are viable.
-
@flyingpenguin @eniko @anthrazit
1. so again, closed source except the google controlled part.
2. these three parts are not equal. google controlling the engine gives them a lot of control over the implementation of web standards -- and not least, as we've seen with the manifest v2 deprecation, over what kind of browser extensions are viable.
@flyingpenguin @eniko @anthrazit
ad blocking and browser coming from different vendors is a _feature_, not something to be fixed in my book.
-
Hey @EUCommission have you considered just like, buying Mozilla and making Firefox the sovereign EU browser?
Or even just funding a non-profit to maintain an EU fork which does things like respect EU laws and regulations
Think about it
Befreiung des Internets mit dem Mullvad Browser
Der Mullvad Browser ist ein auf Datenschutz ausgerichteter Webbrowser, entwickelt in Zusammenarbeit zwischen Mullvad VPN und dem Tor Project. Er wurde entworfen, um Tracking und digitale Fingerabdrücke zu minimieren.
Mullvad VPN (mullvad.net)
-
@hiphopheaven @luc0x61 @booboo @eniko @EUCommission
Vivaldi is not open-source. No matter how good the intentions of current Vivaldi leadership, without the source you're forever the hostage.@Turre @luc0x61 @booboo @eniko @EUCommission i don't care. Ipensourceness is just a bonus for me, features over opensourceness. Most projects end up with no relevant fork and an owner that decide to reject features they don't see fit
-
@flyingpenguin @eniko @anthrazit
1. so again, closed source except the google controlled part.
2. these three parts are not equal. google controlling the engine gives them a lot of control over the implementation of web standards -- and not least, as we've seen with the manifest v2 deprecation, over what kind of browser extensions are viable.
@einsiedlerspiel @flyingpenguin @eniko @anthrazit
From Microsoft (HTML Standard ) to Google ( Manifest )
-
Hey @EUCommission have you considered just like, buying Mozilla and making Firefox the sovereign EU browser?
Or even just funding a non-profit to maintain an EU fork which does things like respect EU laws and regulations
Think about it
@eniko @EUCommission you may want to address @EC_OSPO
-
Bad idea.
The EU commission woul build spyware into it to supply intelligence to Israel.
And it would ban Palestinians and Iranians from using it, because of zionist sanctions.
Why?
Because the EU is a zionist tool.
The answer is to free Firefox, not to swap abusive owner.
@allende1973 @eniko @EUCommission Hab den Beitrag Mastodon gemeldet.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
@eniko @EUCommission Oh btw @servo is kind of that, it's based entirely in the EU and is supported by the Linux Foundation, it's made from the ground-up in Rust, no other browser engine!
@webbop @eniko @EUCommission @servo but rust is AI these days
-
Hey @EUCommission have you considered just like, buying Mozilla and making Firefox the sovereign EU browser?
Or even just funding a non-profit to maintain an EU fork which does things like respect EU laws and regulations
Think about it
@eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place @EUCommission@ec.social-network.europa.eu
1 EU would not be more privacy friendly than mozilla
2 EU is in the pocket of giant corps, google for one -
Hey @EUCommission have you considered just like, buying Mozilla and making Firefox the sovereign EU browser?
Or even just funding a non-profit to maintain an EU fork which does things like respect EU laws and regulations
Think about it
@eniko @EUCommission european nationalism my beloathed. eu this eu that how about just. non-american. and decentralized
-
@eniko @EUCommission No, thanks. Firefox should be an Asian or African browser, since most iconic European companies were killed by European '"protectionism".
@gabeweb
[citation needed] -
@eniko @EUCommission oh! And we could call it Firefeux (“feux” meaning fires in French)
@BartV @eniko @EUCommission shouldn't it be feuxfox then?
-
@BartV @eniko @EUCommission shouldn't it be feuxfox then?
@viq @BartV @eniko @EUCommission der Feuerfuchs
