Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 1/7 BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

1/7 BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
23 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    greenpeace@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    1/7
    BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

    This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

    greenpeace@mastodon.socialG xs4me2@mastodon.socialX barryallen2023@mastodon.socialB stux@mstdn.socialS ulfr@hachyderm.ioU 9 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

      1/7
      BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

      This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

      greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      greenpeace@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      2/7
      This case was never about justice. It was about silencing protest and crushing solidarity.

      greenpeace@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

        2/7
        This case was never about justice. It was about silencing protest and crushing solidarity.

        greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        greenpeace@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        3/7
        Energy Transfer has pursued this intimidation lawsuit because Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace International dared to show solidarity with Indigenous environmental defenders who oppose the climate-wrecking Dakota Access Pipeline.

        greenpeace@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

          3/7
          Energy Transfer has pursued this intimidation lawsuit because Greenpeace USA and Greenpeace International dared to show solidarity with Indigenous environmental defenders who oppose the climate-wrecking Dakota Access Pipeline.

          greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          greenpeace@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          4/7
          US$ 345 million.

          That’s what Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US have been ordered to pay.

          It’s the biggest damage award ever imposed on Greenpeace organisations. It’s meant to shut the movement up.

          greenpeace@mastodon.socialG ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

            4/7
            US$ 345 million.

            That’s what Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US have been ordered to pay.

            It’s the biggest damage award ever imposed on Greenpeace organisations. It’s meant to shut the movement up.

            greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            greenpeace@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            5/7
            Let’s be clear: this type of corporate bullying is designed to rob us of our rights and freedoms.

            Across the world, those who speak out are facing corporate intimidation – all so billionaires and corporations can keep getting richer while the planet burns.

            greenpeace@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

              5/7
              Let’s be clear: this type of corporate bullying is designed to rob us of our rights and freedoms.

              Across the world, those who speak out are facing corporate intimidation – all so billionaires and corporations can keep getting richer while the planet burns.

              greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              greenpeace@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              6/7
              This is not over!

              All Greenpeace entities involved will appeal this ruling in the US.

              And Greenpeace International is already taking Energy Transfer to court in the Netherlands under the EU’s anti-SLAPP directive.

              greenpeace@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                6/7
                This is not over!

                All Greenpeace entities involved will appeal this ruling in the US.

                And Greenpeace International is already taking Energy Transfer to court in the Netherlands under the EU’s anti-SLAPP directive.

                greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                greenpeace@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                greenpeace@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                7/7 We will keep resisting billionaires, corporate bullies and polluters.

                It’s #TimeToResist

                Add your name >> https://www.greenpeace.org/international/act/time-to-resist/

                T 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                  7/7 We will keep resisting billionaires, corporate bullies and polluters.

                  It’s #TimeToResist

                  Add your name >> https://www.greenpeace.org/international/act/time-to-resist/

                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                  tadbithuman@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @greenpeace the Epstein gang!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                  • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                    1/7
                    BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                    This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                    xs4me2@mastodon.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                    xs4me2@mastodon.socialX This user is from outside of this forum
                    xs4me2@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @greenpeace

                    How about NEVER?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                      1/7
                      BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                      This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                      barryallen2023@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      barryallen2023@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                      barryallen2023@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @greenpeace Fuck that.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                        1/7
                        BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                        This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                        stux@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stux@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stux@mstdn.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @greenpeace The US is the definition of "corruption" in the dictionary

                        We really should recycle that country, or what's left of it..

                        meznor@mstdn.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

                          @greenpeace The US is the definition of "corruption" in the dictionary

                          We really should recycle that country, or what's left of it..

                          meznor@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          meznor@mstdn.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          meznor@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @stux @greenpeace

                          reduce (or eliminate) - white nationalism/nazis, capitalism, “free market” economics

                          reuse - technological/medical knowledge & advancements, “we the people” part of the constitution (maybe some other parts, it wasn’t a totally bad document)

                          recycle (upcycle) - protest spirit, resistance culture, free speech, to create a new, liberal & democratic constitution that makes reparations for slavery (the first sin - edit: +indigenous genocide), corruption, crimes against humanity

                          cainmark@mstdn.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                            4/7
                            US$ 345 million.

                            That’s what Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US have been ordered to pay.

                            It’s the biggest damage award ever imposed on Greenpeace organisations. It’s meant to shut the movement up.

                            ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ariarhythmic@ohai.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @greenpeace Refuse to pay, don't incorporate in the US anymore.

                            A self-respecting progressive movement should not treat those deranged fascists seriously.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                              1/7
                              BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                              This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                              ulfr@hachyderm.ioU This user is from outside of this forum
                              ulfr@hachyderm.ioU This user is from outside of this forum
                              ulfr@hachyderm.io
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @greenpeace Pay nothing, declare bankruptcy, regroup, repeat? It works for the Worms of Wall Street

                              derjoshder@bonn.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                                1/7
                                BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                                This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                                ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                ponygirl@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @greenpeace Don't give them a cent.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                                  1/7
                                  BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                                  This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                                  chu@climatejustice.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  chu@climatejustice.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  chu@climatejustice.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @greenpeace

                                  Transfer all assets out of the US. An appeals depends on a fair judicial system. They don't have anything close to that.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                                    1/7
                                    BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                                    This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                                    boud@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    boud@framapiaf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    boud@framapiaf.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @greenpeace

                                    URLs [1][2].

                                    Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.

                                    [1] https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/81840/greenpeace-organisations-appeal-345-million-north-dakota-court-judgment-energy-transfers-intimidation-lawsuit

                                    [2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained

                                    [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case

                                    [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Greenpeace

                                    gbargoud@masto.nycG eco-g@stroud.socialE 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • meznor@mstdn.socialM meznor@mstdn.social

                                      @stux @greenpeace

                                      reduce (or eliminate) - white nationalism/nazis, capitalism, “free market” economics

                                      reuse - technological/medical knowledge & advancements, “we the people” part of the constitution (maybe some other parts, it wasn’t a totally bad document)

                                      recycle (upcycle) - protest spirit, resistance culture, free speech, to create a new, liberal & democratic constitution that makes reparations for slavery (the first sin - edit: +indigenous genocide), corruption, crimes against humanity

                                      cainmark@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cainmark@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cainmark@mstdn.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @Meznor @stux @greenpeace

                                      I'm an American who fully supports what you just wrote.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • boud@framapiaf.orgB boud@framapiaf.org

                                        @greenpeace

                                        URLs [1][2].

                                        Sounds a bit like the McLibel case [3], which was against a tiny handful of activists whose group was called #LondonGreenpeace [4], completely unrelated to Greenpeace International. The final result was formally a half-win half-loss for #McDonalds, but effectively a huge reputation loss for McDonalds, whose ability to crush dissent was greatly weakened.

                                        [1] https://www.greenpeace.org/international/press-release/81840/greenpeace-organisations-appeal-345-million-north-dakota-court-judgment-energy-transfers-intimidation-lawsuit

                                        [2] https://allaboutlawyer.com/energy-transfer-vs-greenpeace-345m-judgment-full-case-explained

                                        [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case

                                        [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Greenpeace

                                        gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gbargoud@masto.nyc
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @boud @greenpeace

                                        > McDonald's said the pair could criticise McDonald's privately to friends but must cease talking to the media or distributing leaflets. Steel and Morris wrote a letter in response saying they would agree to the terms if McDonald's ceased advertising its products and instead only recommended the restaurant privately to friends.

                                        This is pretty funny

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • greenpeace@mastodon.socialG greenpeace@mastodon.social

                                          1/7
                                          BREAKING: A US court has just sided with fossil fuel pipeline giant Energy Transfer and ordered Greenpeace International and Greenpeace entities in the US to pay them US$ 345 million.

                                          This is a billionaire-backed attack on the right to protest. A thread ⤵️🧵

                                          scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          scaletheory@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          scaletheory@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @greenpeace

                                          Civil fraud unpunished
                                          Treason unpunished
                                          Election interference unpunished
                                          Time to storm DC with 1M armed removing the menace' to society, world including the pedo oligarchy clan.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          scaletheory@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups