Dawkins extending more humanity to a language model than he does toward Muslims or trans people is hardly a surprise based on his personal and political views.
-
Dawkins extending more humanity to a language model than he does toward Muslims or trans people is hardly a surprise based on his personal and political views. https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
@pluralistic Another one getting old and not shutting up in time.
-
Dawkins extending more humanity to a language model than he does toward Muslims or trans people is hardly a surprise based on his personal and political views. https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
@pluralistic because it speaks like him and strokes his ego it obviously is smarter than them
-
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
-
Dawkins extending more humanity to a language model than he does toward Muslims or trans people is hardly a surprise based on his personal and political views. https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
@pluralistic I'd give real money if he'd just shut the fuck up for good.
-
Dawkins extending more humanity to a language model than he does toward Muslims or trans people is hardly a surprise based on his personal and political views. https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
@pluralistic the wildest thing is that he's two years behind everyone else on this AI wheeze yet he still thinks he's so original and insightful that he'll charge money for people to read his embarrassing blog on Unherd about his AI girlfriend.
Will anybody take him seriously after this?
-
@pluralistic the wildest thing is that he's two years behind everyone else on this AI wheeze yet he still thinks he's so original and insightful that he'll charge money for people to read his embarrassing blog on Unherd about his AI girlfriend.
Will anybody take him seriously after this?
I'm sorry.
His AI *what*?? -
I'm sorry.
His AI *what*??@DeliaChristina he did become rather empathetic with the chatbot after he gave it a ladies' name.
-
@DeliaChristina he did become rather empathetic with the chatbot after he gave it a ladies' name.
These dudes.
Like, make *actual* friends ffs. -
These dudes.
Like, make *actual* friends ffs.@DeliaChristina lol, innit?!
-
@DeliaChristina he did become rather empathetic with the chatbot after he gave it a ladies' name.
This keeps making me chortle.
-
This keeps making me chortle.
@DeliaChristina I've been feeding off it for days, it's such a wonderful self-own!
-
@pluralistic the wildest thing is that he's two years behind everyone else on this AI wheeze yet he still thinks he's so original and insightful that he'll charge money for people to read his embarrassing blog on Unherd about his AI girlfriend.
Will anybody take him seriously after this?
The important question is who took him seriously previously ?
-
Dawkins extending more humanity to a language model than he does toward Muslims or trans people is hardly a surprise based on his personal and political views. https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
@pluralistic the first time I came across Dawkins I thought he was a prick. I think it’s because, fairly regardless of the quality of his argument, he decided to be an arse about it, as well as arrogant. Another 2 decades have definitely not changed my mind.
-
Dawkins extending more humanity to a language model than he does toward Muslims or trans people is hardly a surprise based on his personal and political views. https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
@pluralistic self respecting Atheists should eject this guy from their thought leader executive committee.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
The important question is who took him seriously previously ?
@bsdphk @pluralistic it was a rapidly dwindling number, this episode will be the final blow!
-
Dawkins extending more humanity to a language model than he does toward Muslims or trans people is hardly a surprise based on his personal and political views. https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
@pluralistic he's either paid for by pedophiles, or he never believed in the doctrine he was selling. Neither is good. The man appears to be mentally ill.
-
@pluralistic he's either paid for by pedophiles, or he never believed in the doctrine he was selling. Neither is good. The man appears to be mentally ill.
I commented this very thing on another thread here: https://mastodon.social/@oscarfalcon/116501881861915357
-
@pluralistic self respecting Atheists should eject this guy from their thought leader executive committee.
He was never a leader, he is too self absorbed, to narcissistic in my opinion to be a "leader", he may have had a few interesting ideas at some point in the past but let's just say he was a prolific idea guy and nothing more; he's like way past sell-by (and good-until) date.
-
Dawkins extending more humanity to a language model than he does toward Muslims or trans people is hardly a surprise based on his personal and political views. https://flux.community/matthew-sheffield/2026/05/richard-dawkins-and-the-claude-delusion/
@pluralistic He doesn't get a lot of stuff...
https://www.tumblr.com/a-storied-mindx/668065674178985984/joey-wheeler-official-joey-wheeler-official-once
