There’s a limited supply of oil.
-
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
@nickofnz
I'm unfortunately able to forsee multiple ways to attack a solar grid.The takeaway should be that some people shouldn't have access to political power and taking away the control of oil is taking away that power from them.
-
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
@nickofnz I'm all for renewable technologies, however sorry, but I think that this kind of over-simplistic arguments using in the discourse are more harmful than useful.
First, solar is nor unlimited (night, cloudy weather) and has environmental costs like solar panels taking land, etc. Second, solar panels need silicon which is not unlimited, and 80% of it comes from China, so it is easy to imagine how politics and possible wars can also easily disrupt it. So, in a sense, there is a limited supply of solar as well, and wars can also be fought for it.
-
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
@nickofnz one project I fear is those in space solar panels, which in theory could be used to block sun or bath an area with sun so plants will die of lack of rest...
-
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
@nickofnz For those who own the oil wells, oil is free too.
(If you ignore the cost of surfacing oil, but for solar apparently we're ignoring the manufacturing costs too).
Technically the energy in the oil comes from the sun too. Trees used sunlight energy to take CO2 and create carbohydrates, which eventually were pressed and condensed to oil with millions of years of geological pressure.
Oil has a very high energy density, that's what makes it so complicated to replace. And the second problem with fossil ressources is that they are not just used to burn them for energy, but they are in all the plastic and chemicals, in fertilizer and in our houses.
Not saying they shouldn't be replaced, just that it's a bit more complicated than to use the sun.
-
@nickofnz already did and I highly recommend it.
Electricity bill $0
Home heating bill $0 (electric)
Water heating bill $0 (electric)
Car fuel bill $0 (electric)5* would do it again.
-
@dandandin @Niall @nickofnz its them that are selling the cars.
-
@lindarosesmit @nickofnz there's no such thing as free or free from impact except death. Everything is a trade-off unless you wish to cease to exist.
I put a lot of money and time in to the core of my setup 10 years ago, which is solar, batteries and inverter. Since then I have tweaked and improved things, most notably my batteries. Initially I was using retired ex-telecom lead-acid batteries. Now I am using a reconfigured battery from my Nissan leaf (after I upgraded the car's battery) and an ex forklift battery which I rescued from the scrap yard. -
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
@nickofnz this sounds really complicated
. -
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
Not quite. 85% of the whole PV supply chain is controlled by one country - #China
Not saying PV is wrong on itself, but the current European model of "energy transformation" where all manufacturing was outsourced to a hostile country is just as suicidal as previous outsourcing of fossil fuels to Russia.
-
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
@nickofnz Not just a limited supply, but a limited amount. Dinosaurs have been extinct for millions of years. There are no more to replenish. Once we burn through them, that's it.
-
@lindarosesmit @nickofnz there's no such thing as free or free from impact except death. Everything is a trade-off unless you wish to cease to exist.
I put a lot of money and time in to the core of my setup 10 years ago, which is solar, batteries and inverter. Since then I have tweaked and improved things, most notably my batteries. Initially I was using retired ex-telecom lead-acid batteries. Now I am using a reconfigured battery from my Nissan leaf (after I upgraded the car's battery) and an ex forklift battery which I rescued from the scrap yard.@Niall @lindarosesmit @nickofnz end-of-life battery reuse is a very cool project
I had the same idea but I’m glad someone is actually doing it. Good luck! -
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
-
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
@JustinMac84 @nickofnz Absolutely agreed.
-
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
@nickofnz Hit politicians over the head with this until they start learning from their own mistakes, which were only 4 years ago, FFS.
Until they do, the oil lobby will always have them by the balls.
-
Not quite. 85% of the whole PV supply chain is controlled by one country - #China
Not saying PV is wrong on itself, but the current European model of "energy transformation" where all manufacturing was outsourced to a hostile country is just as suicidal as previous outsourcing of fossil fuels to Russia.
@kravietz except panels will work fine for decades, while fuel will do it's job exactly once.
It's difference between owning and subscription
-
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
No Green Transition without Green Sacrifice Zones
Nickel Mining Threatens Palawan Forests and Livelihoods Despite Moratorium – Intercontinental Cry
Palawan—long hailed as the Philippines’ ‘last ecological frontier’—is once again under siege. Despite the mounting threats mining poses to indigenous ancestral
Intercontinental Cry (icmagazine.org)
-
There’s a limited supply of oil. It’s very expensive and wars are fought for it.
There is endless sunlight. It’s free and no wars are fought for it.
Let’s choose solar.
@nickofnz No country was ever invaded for its wind or sunlight.
-
@nickofnz No country was ever invaded for its wind or sunlight.
-
@nickofnz I'm all for renewable technologies, however sorry, but I think that this kind of over-simplistic arguments using in the discourse are more harmful than useful.
First, solar is nor unlimited (night, cloudy weather) and has environmental costs like solar panels taking land, etc. Second, solar panels need silicon which is not unlimited, and 80% of it comes from China, so it is easy to imagine how politics and possible wars can also easily disrupt it. So, in a sense, there is a limited supply of solar as well, and wars can also be fought for it.
-
@mo@mastodon.ml @nickofnz@mastodon.nz
Yes, there's definitely huge difference between fuel and generation infrastructure, except it's not as simple as "buy once, use for decades":
- due to very low surface power density of PV you need millions of these
- each year some of them fail, which you need to replace, and the whole economic viability depends on prices of these planned for decades in advance
- PV depend on inverters and most of the Chinese ones come with firmware backdoors that are remotely exploitable
