Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well this is truly bad.

Well this is truly bad.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
26 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • burnoutqueen@todon.nlB burnoutqueen@todon.nl

    @cwebber

    The fascist playbook is to use the pigs to kill the people who oppose the regime, and to use censorship to silence those who would support them.

    K This user is from outside of this forum
    K This user is from outside of this forum
    kkarhan@jorts.horse
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    @burnoutqueen @cwebber EXACTLY!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • duncan_bayne@mastodon.bsd.cafeD duncan_bayne@mastodon.bsd.cafe

      @cwebber It may just be old fashioned authoritarianism too, I guess. Very convenient for politicians if all online speech can be tied back to individuals through official ID.

      K This user is from outside of this forum
      K This user is from outside of this forum
      kkarhan@jorts.horse
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @duncan_bayne @cwebber precisely!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

        We don't know who's funding this stuff for sure, there was the vibecoded analysis that came to the conclusion of Meta, but I suspect that could be true but Meta wouldn't be alone.

        Who stands to benefit from this? A lot of forces of centralization, and anti-LGBTQ orgs:

        - Microsoft, for sure, since they are seeing Windows' dominance threatened?
        - Apple, for similar reasons?
        - Peter Theil and similar surveillance company owners and operators?
        - Anti-queer orgs and think tanks like the Heritage Foundation?
        - Cloudflare, who will probably run the age verification paywalls everyone will be forced to deploy?

        Who's behind this? Who's getting politicians so excited about it? There's such a swell of bipartisan support seemingly out of nowhere, and my suspicion is a lot of that enthusiasm is coming from check-writing.

        So who's behind it?

        kbal@fedia.ioK This user is from outside of this forum
        kbal@fedia.ioK This user is from outside of this forum
        kbal@fedia.io
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        The name Elon comes to mind

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dantescanline@autonomous.zoneD dantescanline@autonomous.zone shared this topic
          R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

          We don't know who's funding this stuff for sure, there was the vibecoded analysis that came to the conclusion of Meta, but I suspect that could be true but Meta wouldn't be alone.

          Who stands to benefit from this? A lot of forces of centralization, and anti-LGBTQ orgs:

          - Microsoft, for sure, since they are seeing Windows' dominance threatened?
          - Apple, for similar reasons?
          - Peter Theil and similar surveillance company owners and operators?
          - Anti-queer orgs and think tanks like the Heritage Foundation?
          - Cloudflare, who will probably run the age verification paywalls everyone will be forced to deploy?

          Who's behind this? Who's getting politicians so excited about it? There's such a swell of bipartisan support seemingly out of nowhere, and my suspicion is a lot of that enthusiasm is coming from check-writing.

          So who's behind it?

          zed@mstdn.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
          zed@mstdn.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
          zed@mstdn.party
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @cwebber I would assume it is not the platform owners (Apple and Microsoft) because their prior arguments have been that the social media companies should be doing the verification.

          And the social media companies want the platform owners to do the age verification.

          Neither group realizes we don’t need age verification at all, but when it comes to a bill that requires OS owners to build in age verification it wouldn’t make sense that Apple and Microsoft would be lobbying for it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

            Well this is truly bad. US national level OS-level age verification bill. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info

            The text of it isn't out yet.

            corb_the_lesser@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            corb_the_lesser@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            corb_the_lesser@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @cwebber I think I'll say I'm 184.

            It's an absurd and dangerous thing.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

              We don't know who's funding this stuff for sure, there was the vibecoded analysis that came to the conclusion of Meta, but I suspect that could be true but Meta wouldn't be alone.

              Who stands to benefit from this? A lot of forces of centralization, and anti-LGBTQ orgs:

              - Microsoft, for sure, since they are seeing Windows' dominance threatened?
              - Apple, for similar reasons?
              - Peter Theil and similar surveillance company owners and operators?
              - Anti-queer orgs and think tanks like the Heritage Foundation?
              - Cloudflare, who will probably run the age verification paywalls everyone will be forced to deploy?

              Who's behind this? Who's getting politicians so excited about it? There's such a swell of bipartisan support seemingly out of nowhere, and my suspicion is a lot of that enthusiasm is coming from check-writing.

              So who's behind it?

              gert@social.coopG This user is from outside of this forum
              gert@social.coopG This user is from outside of this forum
              gert@social.coop
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @cwebber Move fast, break things and f**k the public.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                Well this is truly bad. US national level OS-level age verification bill. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info

                The text of it isn't out yet.

                varx@defcon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                varx@defcon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                varx@defcon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @cwebber Putting aside the obvious privacy concerns, a big question is "what *is* an operating system?"

                Do medical or industrial devices need to verify age? Do any of the appliance IoT devices like security cameras, ovens, washing machines, etc etc need to verify a users age? They all run some sort of operating system. Sometimes a pretty advanced one at that.

                If not then what if I build a custom embedded linux distro using yocto for myself to browse the web? Does it need to verify age? What about nixOS or arch?

                Any law about this is going to have vague definitions and unequal enforcement. Which may be the whole point actually.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                  We don't know who's funding this stuff for sure, there was the vibecoded analysis that came to the conclusion of Meta, but I suspect that could be true but Meta wouldn't be alone.

                  Who stands to benefit from this? A lot of forces of centralization, and anti-LGBTQ orgs:

                  - Microsoft, for sure, since they are seeing Windows' dominance threatened?
                  - Apple, for similar reasons?
                  - Peter Theil and similar surveillance company owners and operators?
                  - Anti-queer orgs and think tanks like the Heritage Foundation?
                  - Cloudflare, who will probably run the age verification paywalls everyone will be forced to deploy?

                  Who's behind this? Who's getting politicians so excited about it? There's such a swell of bipartisan support seemingly out of nowhere, and my suspicion is a lot of that enthusiasm is coming from check-writing.

                  So who's behind it?

                  cczona@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cczona@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cczona@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @cwebber in Europe the corresponding law was just defeated yet again 2 weeks ago and had been spearheaded by Thorn (Ashton Kutcher's org, and it "happens" to be an age verification vendor) along with lobbyists for FAANG companies. We've had to shoot down Chat Control 1.0 so many times in the past year and they're already pushing hard on Chat Control 2.0. So expect similar players behind the US version and a long fight. There is a lot of money in age verification, the associated data, and the power of gatekeeping. They're not going to let go of this agenda easily, especially given that the US is led by gullible zealots who desperately need to appear by the midterms as if they care about child sexual exploitation. So the lobbyists have leverage rn to railroad this through in the US if we don't pushback hard and fast.

                  To bootstrap, anti-Chat Control orgs such as https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ have helpful talking points and templates that can be adapted.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                    We don't know who's funding this stuff for sure, there was the vibecoded analysis that came to the conclusion of Meta, but I suspect that could be true but Meta wouldn't be alone.

                    Who stands to benefit from this? A lot of forces of centralization, and anti-LGBTQ orgs:

                    - Microsoft, for sure, since they are seeing Windows' dominance threatened?
                    - Apple, for similar reasons?
                    - Peter Theil and similar surveillance company owners and operators?
                    - Anti-queer orgs and think tanks like the Heritage Foundation?
                    - Cloudflare, who will probably run the age verification paywalls everyone will be forced to deploy?

                    Who's behind this? Who's getting politicians so excited about it? There's such a swell of bipartisan support seemingly out of nowhere, and my suspicion is a lot of that enthusiasm is coming from check-writing.

                    So who's behind it?

                    gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.placeG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @cwebber the whole ds industry would benefit. Some service doing age verification with a payment is a pretty strong tell tale.
                    You the guarantee, by law, you are showing ads to adult who can make impulsive purchase. Or to kids, who will get very differenf ads, to bother their parents until they buy the stuff.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • duncan_bayne@mastodon.bsd.cafeD duncan_bayne@mastodon.bsd.cafe

                      @cwebber It may just be old fashioned authoritarianism too, I guess. Very convenient for politicians if all online speech can be tied back to individuals through official ID.

                      feral_3d@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                      feral_3d@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                      feral_3d@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @duncan_bayne @cwebber it's this.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                        We don't know who's funding this stuff for sure, there was the vibecoded analysis that came to the conclusion of Meta, but I suspect that could be true but Meta wouldn't be alone.

                        Who stands to benefit from this? A lot of forces of centralization, and anti-LGBTQ orgs:

                        - Microsoft, for sure, since they are seeing Windows' dominance threatened?
                        - Apple, for similar reasons?
                        - Peter Theil and similar surveillance company owners and operators?
                        - Anti-queer orgs and think tanks like the Heritage Foundation?
                        - Cloudflare, who will probably run the age verification paywalls everyone will be forced to deploy?

                        Who's behind this? Who's getting politicians so excited about it? There's such a swell of bipartisan support seemingly out of nowhere, and my suspicion is a lot of that enthusiasm is coming from check-writing.

                        So who's behind it?

                        nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nicksilkey@hachyderm.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @cwebber an entire industry exists to monitor and enforce and gatekeep and curtail human sociotechnical choices and free will with technical governance. 🔐

                        Lots of folks will bank. Lots. Think of the recurring durable revenue of enforcement. Naturally free humans and their lifecycles of choices is the renewable resource being mucked with. 💙

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                          If *I* were an investigative journalist, this is a piece I'd be pouring a lot of energy into. I know we have a few investigative journalists on here... maybe someone wants to take it up?

                          tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tuban_muzuru@beige.party
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @cwebber

                          Here's the legislation:

                          Just a moment...

                          favicon

                          (www.congress.gov)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups