Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings.

A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
schoolsafetycybersecurityleadershipsecurityprivacy
47 Posts 38 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

    A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

    Here's what's not in the headline:

    πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

    βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

    πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

    The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

    I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

    "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

    I hope not.

    https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
    #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

    koushiniku@hachyderm.ioK This user is from outside of this forum
    koushiniku@hachyderm.ioK This user is from outside of this forum
    koushiniku@hachyderm.io
    wrote last edited by
    #12

    @brian_greenberg My god all these Tolkien fetish companies.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

      A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

      Here's what's not in the headline:

      πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

      βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

      πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

      The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

      I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

      "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

      I hope not.

      https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
      #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

      etschneider@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
      etschneider@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
      etschneider@mastodon.online
      wrote last edited by
      #13

      @brian_greenberg I think I start to be of age I don't know any more what to say to my kids about decisions made by grown-ups...
      My!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

        A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

        Here's what's not in the headline:

        πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

        βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

        πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

        The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

        I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

        "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

        I hope not.

        https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
        #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

        courtcan@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        courtcan@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        courtcan@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #14

        @brian_greenberg The second my kid's school brought these in would be the second I remove her from the school. This insanity is just inconceivable.

        (I know, that word doesn't mean what I think it does. *SIGH* 😫)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

          A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

          Here's what's not in the headline:

          πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

          βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

          πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

          The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

          I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

          "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

          I hope not.

          https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
          #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

          houba@spore.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          houba@spore.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          houba@spore.social
          wrote last edited by
          #15

          @brian_greenberg

          Is it just me or is it obvious that those drones wouldn't stand a chance against a kid with a schoolbag.

          And the chance is, they would be facing off against a number of kids.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

            A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

            Here's what's not in the headline:

            πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

            βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

            πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

            The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

            I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

            "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

            I hope not.

            https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
            #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

            jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jonathankoren@sfba.social
            wrote last edited by
            #16

            @brian_greenberg TIL fpv $50 racing drones are β€œmilitary style”. Glad I can buy military munitions from… Amazon?

            Don’t get me wrong, the militarization of the police and the police, and turning American high schools into literal police states are bullshit, but we can make these arguments without dipshittery as β€œmilitary style drones”

            cmdrmoto@hachyderm.ioC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

              A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

              Here's what's not in the headline:

              πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

              βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

              πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

              The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

              I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

              "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

              I hope not.

              https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
              #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
              wrote last edited by
              #17

              @brian_greenberg

              your link is broken(?)

              wsj.com

              favicon

              (www.wsj.com)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

                @brian_greenberg TIL fpv $50 racing drones are β€œmilitary style”. Glad I can buy military munitions from… Amazon?

                Don’t get me wrong, the militarization of the police and the police, and turning American high schools into literal police states are bullshit, but we can make these arguments without dipshittery as β€œmilitary style drones”

                cmdrmoto@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                cmdrmoto@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                cmdrmoto@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #18

                @jonathankoren @brian_greenberg Well, that’s part of the problem, see. Those fpv drones that are fun to race? The military is adopting remarkably similar devices for carrying explosives to enemy combatants.

                I think it’s fair to call any quadcopter β€œmilitary-style” if it’s armed.

                Yes, even if those armaments are less-lethal munitions like chemical irritants

                And *especially* if it’s a device manufactured in quantity by a defense contractor.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                  A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                  Here's what's not in the headline:

                  πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                  βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                  πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                  The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                  I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                  "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                  I hope not.

                  https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                  #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                  nilrori@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nilrori@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nilrori@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #19

                  @brian_greenberg They will do literally anything, but solve the real, underlying issue of school shootings…

                  dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                    A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                    Here's what's not in the headline:

                    πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                    βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                    πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                    The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                    I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                    "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                    I hope not.

                    https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                    #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    jackryder@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #20

                    @brian_greenberg They have created a main website it looks like.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Campus Guardian Angel

                    An elite, on-site safety response capability that teams with law enforcement, confronting any active shooter threat in seconds to save lives.

                    favicon

                    (www.campusguardianangel.com)

                    More videos...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sfoskett@techfieldday.netS sfoskett@techfieldday.net

                      @brian_greenberg spending millions on a high-tech fake fix that will never get used.

                      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
                      wrote last edited by
                      #21

                      @sfoskett @brian_greenberg

                      A lot of classrooms still have huge electronic whiteboards that cost thousands of dollars each and were never used.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                        A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                        Here's what's not in the headline:

                        πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                        βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                        πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                        The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                        I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                        "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                        I hope not.

                        https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                        #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                        otter_linnus@det.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                        otter_linnus@det.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                        otter_linnus@det.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #22

                        @brian_greenberg reminds me of a short Film from probably at least 10yrs ago based on a scientifically build outlook of drone usage. Was the stuff of nightmares then as well as today. Can't find the source right now though...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                          A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                          Here's what's not in the headline:

                          πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                          βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                          πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                          The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                          I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                          "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                          I hope not.

                          https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                          #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                          artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
                          artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
                          artharg@mastodon.nl
                          wrote last edited by
                          #23

                          @brian_greenberg @Gargron Why drones? Why don’t they just use ceiling-mounted gun turrets and remotely activated Claymore mines?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                            A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                            Here's what's not in the headline:

                            πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                            βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                            πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                            The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                            I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                            "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                            I hope not.

                            https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                            #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                            mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mike@thecanadian.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #24

                            @brian_greenberg On the weekend I watched a dramatization of a school shooting and it honestly traumatized me more than any war movie I've ever seen. Not sure this is the solution but I sure do get the motivation.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                              A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                              Here's what's not in the headline:

                              πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                              βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                              πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                              The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                              I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                              "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                              I hope not.

                              https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                              #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                              sollat@masto.aiS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sollat@masto.aiS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sollat@masto.ai
                              wrote last edited by
                              #25

                              @brian_greenberg
                              Pepper gel sounds like a great way to create a mass chemical attack in a storm/power outage/earthquake.

                              /s

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                Here's what's not in the headline:

                                πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                I hope not.

                                https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ariarhythmic@ohai.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #26

                                @brian_greenberg post reads like AI slop, in case it is, please learn better

                                dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                  A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                  Here's what's not in the headline:

                                  πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                  βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                  πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                  The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                  I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                  "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                  I hope not.

                                  https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                  #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                  saucerlost@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  saucerlost@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  saucerlost@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @brian_greenberg
                                  My message to the kids:

                                  Break these fucking things

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                    A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                    Here's what's not in the headline:

                                    πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                    βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                    πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                    The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                    I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                    "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                    I hope not.

                                    https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                    #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                    beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    beachbum@mastodon.sdf.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #28

                                    @brian_greenberg Wow, just Wow.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                      A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                      Here's what's not in the headline:

                                      πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                      βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                      πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                      The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                      I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                      "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                      I hope not.

                                      https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                      #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                      beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      beachbum@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      beachbum@mastodon.sdf.org
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @brian_greenberg I thought it was bad when South Carolina’s Education Department formed a partnership last week with the #fascist group Turning Point. I will fight this tooth and nail. #uspol

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                        A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                        Here's what's not in the headline:

                                        πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                        βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                        πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                        The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                        I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                        "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                        I hope not.

                                        https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                        #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                        rustedcomputing@discuss.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rustedcomputing@discuss.systemsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rustedcomputing@discuss.systems
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @brian_greenberg ...the way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a DRONE WITH A GUN?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                          A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                          Here's what's not in the headline:

                                          πŸ”’ The drones use an encrypted connection β€” but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                          βš–οΈ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                          πŸ’° Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                          The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                          I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                          "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                          I hope not.

                                          https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                          #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                          blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          blogdiva@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #31

                                          @brian_greenberg isn’t Mithril another Lord of the Rings reference?

                                          inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups