Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings.

A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
schoolsafetycybersecurityleadershipsecurityprivacy
47 Posts 38 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

    A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

    Here's what's not in the headline:

    🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

    ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

    💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

    The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

    I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

    "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

    I hope not.

    https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
    #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

    sfoskett@techfieldday.netS This user is from outside of this forum
    sfoskett@techfieldday.netS This user is from outside of this forum
    sfoskett@techfieldday.net
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @brian_greenberg spending millions on a high-tech fake fix that will never get used.

    aburka@hachyderm.ioA mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

      A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

      Here's what's not in the headline:

      🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

      ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

      💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

      The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

      I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

      "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

      I hope not.

      https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
      #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

      netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      netraven@hear-me.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      netraven@hear-me.social
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @brian_greenberg this is pure comedy, I just have to add. The kids will absolutely LOVE hacking these and flying them in exactly that manner, PURE CHAOS MODE.

      Back in my day, we just pulled the fire alarm. Jesus christ, I can't stop laughing.

      inkomtech@infosec.exchangeI 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

        A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

        Here's what's not in the headline:

        🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

        ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

        💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

        The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

        I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

        "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

        I hope not.

        https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
        #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

        nicelymanifest@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        nicelymanifest@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        nicelymanifest@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @brian_greenberg We seem to be surging leaps and bounds into a dystopia that not even those propelling us would want if they thought for one moment what they were doing to enable it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

          A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

          Here's what's not in the headline:

          🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

          ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

          💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

          The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

          I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

          "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

          I hope not.

          https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
          #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

          cmdrmoto@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
          cmdrmoto@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
          cmdrmoto@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @brian_greenberg Original link 404s for me.

          This appears to be the same news?
          https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-to-stop-mass-shootings-a7800ade

          The short film Slaughterbots was not meant to be an instruction manual ☹️

          https://youtu.be/O-2tpwW0kmU

          staringatclouds@mstdn.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

            A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

            Here's what's not in the headline:

            🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

            ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

            💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

            The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

            I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

            "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

            I hope not.

            https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
            #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

            n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
            n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
            n_dimension@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @brian_greenberg

            ...are gas masks and body plates harder to get in US?
            Because if they are easier to buy than a rifle, this isn't stopping anything

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sfoskett@techfieldday.netS sfoskett@techfieldday.net

              @brian_greenberg spending millions on a high-tech fake fix that will never get used.

              aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
              aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
              aburka@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @sfoskett @brian_greenberg oh don't worry, it will be used against minority students

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                Here's what's not in the headline:

                🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                I hope not.

                https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                schnedan@social.tchncs.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                schnedan@social.tchncs.de
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @brian_greenberg guess it ads to the experience of a school massacre to shoot the drones first... 🙄 kind of a game of skill

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.social shared this topic
                  R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                  A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                  Here's what's not in the headline:

                  🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                  ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                  💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                  The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                  I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                  "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                  I hope not.

                  https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                  #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                  ycwang@mastodon.gamedev.placeY This user is from outside of this forum
                  ycwang@mastodon.gamedev.placeY This user is from outside of this forum
                  ycwang@mastodon.gamedev.place
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @brian_greenberg It's crazy. I don't want a drone monitoring my kids.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                    A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                    Here's what's not in the headline:

                    🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                    ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                    💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                    The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                    I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                    "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                    I hope not.

                    https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                    #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    blizzardoflinux@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @brian_greenberg dystopian asf to read

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                      A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                      Here's what's not in the headline:

                      🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                      ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                      💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                      The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                      I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                      "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                      I hope not.

                      https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                      #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                      koushiniku@hachyderm.ioK This user is from outside of this forum
                      koushiniku@hachyderm.ioK This user is from outside of this forum
                      koushiniku@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @brian_greenberg My god all these Tolkien fetish companies.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                        A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                        Here's what's not in the headline:

                        🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                        ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                        💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                        The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                        I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                        "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                        I hope not.

                        https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                        #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                        etschneider@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                        etschneider@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                        etschneider@mastodon.online
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        @brian_greenberg I think I start to be of age I don't know any more what to say to my kids about decisions made by grown-ups...
                        My!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                          A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                          Here's what's not in the headline:

                          🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                          ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                          💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                          The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                          I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                          "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                          I hope not.

                          https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                          #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                          courtcan@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          courtcan@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          courtcan@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          @brian_greenberg The second my kid's school brought these in would be the second I remove her from the school. This insanity is just inconceivable.

                          (I know, that word doesn't mean what I think it does. *SIGH* 😫)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                            A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                            Here's what's not in the headline:

                            🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                            ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                            💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                            The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                            I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                            "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                            I hope not.

                            https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                            #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                            houba@spore.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                            houba@spore.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                            houba@spore.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            @brian_greenberg

                            Is it just me or is it obvious that those drones wouldn't stand a chance against a kid with a schoolbag.

                            And the chance is, they would be facing off against a number of kids.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                              A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                              Here's what's not in the headline:

                              🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                              ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                              💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                              The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                              I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                              "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                              I hope not.

                              https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                              #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                              jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jonathankoren@sfba.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              @brian_greenberg TIL fpv $50 racing drones are “military style”. Glad I can buy military munitions from… Amazon?

                              Don’t get me wrong, the militarization of the police and the police, and turning American high schools into literal police states are bullshit, but we can make these arguments without dipshittery as “military style drones”

                              cmdrmoto@hachyderm.ioC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                Here's what's not in the headline:

                                🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                I hope not.

                                https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                wrote last edited by
                                #17

                                @brian_greenberg

                                your link is broken(?)

                                wsj.com

                                favicon

                                (www.wsj.com)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jonathankoren@sfba.socialJ jonathankoren@sfba.social

                                  @brian_greenberg TIL fpv $50 racing drones are “military style”. Glad I can buy military munitions from… Amazon?

                                  Don’t get me wrong, the militarization of the police and the police, and turning American high schools into literal police states are bullshit, but we can make these arguments without dipshittery as “military style drones”

                                  cmdrmoto@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cmdrmoto@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cmdrmoto@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @jonathankoren @brian_greenberg Well, that’s part of the problem, see. Those fpv drones that are fun to race? The military is adopting remarkably similar devices for carrying explosives to enemy combatants.

                                  I think it’s fair to call any quadcopter “military-style” if it’s armed.

                                  Yes, even if those armaments are less-lethal munitions like chemical irritants

                                  And *especially* if it’s a device manufactured in quantity by a defense contractor.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                    A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                    Here's what's not in the headline:

                                    🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                    ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                    💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                    The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                    I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                    "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                    I hope not.

                                    https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                    #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                    nilrori@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nilrori@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nilrori@mstdn.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @brian_greenberg They will do literally anything, but solve the real, underlying issue of school shootings…

                                    dresstokilt@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                      A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                      Here's what's not in the headline:

                                      🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                      ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                      💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                      The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                      I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                      "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                      I hope not.

                                      https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                      #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                      J This user is from outside of this forum
                                      J This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jackryder@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @brian_greenberg They have created a main website it looks like.

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Campus Guardian Angel

                                      An elite, on-site safety response capability that teams with law enforcement, confronting any active shooter threat in seconds to save lives.

                                      favicon

                                      (www.campusguardianangel.com)

                                      More videos...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sfoskett@techfieldday.netS sfoskett@techfieldday.net

                                        @brian_greenberg spending millions on a high-tech fake fix that will never get used.

                                        mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @sfoskett @brian_greenberg

                                        A lot of classrooms still have huge electronic whiteboards that cost thousands of dollars each and were never used.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                        • brian_greenberg@infosec.exchangeB brian_greenberg@infosec.exchange

                                          A startup is putting military-style drones in high school ceilings. Ceiling-mounted. Charging. Waiting. And when something happens, a pilot in Austin, Texas, decides whether to deploy pepper gel on your kid's school. I'm not saying the problem isn't real. It absolutely is. But read that back.... in schools. We've taken a Ukrainian battlefield tactic against Russian soldiers and ported it to Deltona High School in Florida. The co-founder literally said the idea came from watching drone videos of the war in Ukraine. The chief pilot described it as "cheating in a video game after you die." These are children.

                                          Here's what's not in the headline:

                                          🔒 The drones use an encrypted connection — but the article notes they're potentially vulnerable to cyberattack. A compromised drone in a crowded hallway isn't a security tool; it's a weapon pointed in the wrong direction.

                                          ⚖️ Mithril reserves the right to act independently during an attack, without waiting for law enforcement. A private company operating remotely is making use-of-force decisions at a school.

                                          💰 Florida and Georgia approved $500K+ each for this. A group of Texas parents raised $200K more. That's real money going to ceiling drones instead of mental health services, counselors, or de-escalation programs.

                                          The ACLU said it plainly: when force becomes a zero-risk remote action, it gets overused. Axon tried a Taser drone for schools in 2022, and its own ethics board killed it. Mithril is picking up where that got dropped.

                                          I teach cybersecurity. I've spent years in boardrooms helping organizations think through risk. And the risk calculus here isn't just about whether the drone works. It's about what we're normalizing when we turn schools into drone-monitored combat zones and call it progress.

                                          "This is the future," said the sheriff's captain.

                                          I hope not.

                                          https://www.wsj.com/business/a-startup-is-supplying-drones-to-high-schools-a7800ade
                                          #SchoolSafety #Cybersecurity #Leadership #security #privacy #cloud #infosec

                                          otter_linnus@det.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          otter_linnus@det.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          otter_linnus@det.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #22

                                          @brian_greenberg reminds me of a short Film from probably at least 10yrs ago based on a scientifically build outlook of drone usage. Was the stuff of nightmares then as well as today. Can't find the source right now though...

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups