Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit?

Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
76 Posts 62 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

    Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

    SpaceX is truly awful.

    nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
    nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
    nonya_bidniss@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @sundogplanets Recommend adding #journalism #media #space #science for reach on groups

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

      Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

      SpaceX is truly awful.

      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @sundogplanets

      His really big spaceship is a flaming mess too. Flawed system concept. Years behind schedule. Unlikely to every work.

      moira@mastodon.murkworks.netM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

        @sundogplanets

        His really big spaceship is a flaming mess too. Flawed system concept. Years behind schedule. Unlikely to every work.

        moira@mastodon.murkworks.netM This user is from outside of this forum
        moira@mastodon.murkworks.netM This user is from outside of this forum
        moira@mastodon.murkworks.net
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets He just needs a good supplier of Rearden Metal and everything will be fine

        ( /s in case you don't remember minutia of Atlas Shrugged )

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

          Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

          SpaceX is truly awful.

          bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bhasic@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          bhasic@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @sundogplanets There's also the ozone layer issue. Holes in it used to be a bad thing. I guess not anynore. Musk is destroying the planet and no one stops him.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

            Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

            SpaceX is truly awful.

            uplategeek@bitbang.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
            uplategeek@bitbang.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
            uplategeek@bitbang.social
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @sundogplanets but they increased the price for aviation customers from $65/month to $250 and decreased the allowance to 20GB. That’s over 3.5x shareholder value! And if you want to go >300MPH, it’s $1,000. That’s >15x! Line go up means they should be allowed to dump as much metal into the atmosphere, no matter what unknown consequences might occur.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

              Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

              SpaceX is truly awful.

              ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV This user is from outside of this forum
              ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV This user is from outside of this forum
              ve2uwy@mastodon.radio
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @sundogplanets

              What percentage of those articles were generated by "AI"? 50%? 80?

              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                SpaceX is truly awful.

                dirkhh@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                dirkhh@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                dirkhh@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @sundogplanets
                Truly awful. And also on track to pull off a nice heist of everyone's retirement savings. Accelerated entry into the indexes, weighted at 5x actual float. Which means every passive index fund that doesn't exclude mega-caps will be forced to buy a ton of that garbage...

                Link Preview Image
                Michael Burry Flags 'Structural Manipulation' Risk In Nasdaq Rules Ahead Of Potential SpaceX Listing

                Michael Burry slams Nasdaq's proposed rule changes that could fast-track SpaceX into the Nasdaq-100 just 15 days after its IPO, warning of forced passive buying and insider wealth transfer at the expense of retail investors.

                favicon

                Sahm (www.sahmcapital.com)

                apologies for the YouTube link... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rS3fTbC7TE

                salixsericea@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                  Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                  SpaceX is truly awful.

                  becovich@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  becovich@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  becovich@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @sundogplanets
                  I always ask myself: Why so many?

                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                    Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                    SpaceX is truly awful.

                    luna@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                    luna@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                    luna@mastodon.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @sundogplanets It's not even that fast of service.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                      Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                      SpaceX is truly awful.

                      billbennett@mastodon.nzB This user is from outside of this forum
                      billbennett@mastodon.nzB This user is from outside of this forum
                      billbennett@mastodon.nz
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @sundogplanets Apparently this is why the Ozone hole is back. And the buggers are only just getting started.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                        Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                        SpaceX is truly awful.

                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        hunterm@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @sundogplanets I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately it’s really sad

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                          Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                          SpaceX is truly awful.

                          smashie603@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          smashie603@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          smashie603@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @sundogplanets donald is the son of perdition donald is the anti-christ the beast... elon is the devil incarnate, lucifer walks among Humanity. maga is a mark of the beast. Wake Up Humanity... WAKE UP!!!

                          elon is the devil incarnate, he Is lucifer.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                            Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                            SpaceX is truly awful.

                            drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                            drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
                            drewtowler@mas.to
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @sundogplanets SpaceX - or rather #Starlink - is my lifeline, and the lifeline of many thousands of others living in a rural location with no proper broadband service. #Spacex may be "awful" but it has improved my quality of life immeasurably.

                            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS johnlogic@sfba.socialJ michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM joe_vinegar@mastodon.bida.imJ 4 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • drewtowler@mas.toD drewtowler@mas.to

                              @sundogplanets SpaceX - or rather #Starlink - is my lifeline, and the lifeline of many thousands of others living in a rural location with no proper broadband service. #Spacex may be "awful" but it has improved my quality of life immeasurably.

                              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @drewtowler Absolutely understand that. SpaceX could provide internet access without destroying the night sky and the atmosphere if they would focus on providing service with fewer satellites that have longer operating lifetimes. That is the engineering challenge they need to rise to.

                              drewtowler@mas.toD 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • becovich@mastodon.socialB becovich@mastodon.social

                                @sundogplanets
                                I always ask myself: Why so many?

                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @Becovich That is a question no one has ever made SpaceX answer.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ve2uwy@mastodon.radioV ve2uwy@mastodon.radio

                                  @sundogplanets

                                  What percentage of those articles were generated by "AI"? 50%? 80?

                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @VE2UWY 😭

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • drewtowler@mas.toD drewtowler@mas.to

                                    @sundogplanets SpaceX - or rather #Starlink - is my lifeline, and the lifeline of many thousands of others living in a rural location with no proper broadband service. #Spacex may be "awful" but it has improved my quality of life immeasurably.

                                    johnlogic@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    johnlogic@sfba.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    johnlogic@sfba.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @drewtowler can you not instead get ViaSat or HughesNet?

                                    drewtowler@mas.toD 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                      Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                                      Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                                      SpaceX is truly awful.

                                      mk_rexx@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mk_rexx@metalhead.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mk_rexx@metalhead.club
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      I remember those passing scenes in Wall-E with Earth literally covered in space trash. Little me found the surface wasteland plausible but space junk—couldn't be that bad, right?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                                        Any journalists want to write an article about all the environmental costs of the more than 10,000 Starlinks that are now in orbit? All I'm seeing are breathless articles mindlessly worshiping That Awful Billionaire for crossing the 10,000 satellite mark.

                                        Every single one of those will come down in an uncontrolled reentry. That's a lot of metal in the atmosphere, and a lot of dice-rolling to see if any more pieces will make it to the ground.

                                        SpaceX is truly awful.

                                        cassandravert@indieweb.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cassandravert@indieweb.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cassandravert@indieweb.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        Also, those satellites are what allows Putin to help Iran target us.
                                        Not an environmental problem, but worth mentioning.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • drewtowler@mas.toD drewtowler@mas.to

                                          @sundogplanets SpaceX - or rather #Starlink - is my lifeline, and the lifeline of many thousands of others living in a rural location with no proper broadband service. #Spacex may be "awful" but it has improved my quality of life immeasurably.

                                          michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          michael_w_busch@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          michael_w_busch@mastodon.online
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @drewtowler

                                          As @sundogplanets wrote: Satellite internet works fine with far fewer satellites in higher orbits.

                                          Or more places could have fiber run out to local wireless towers.

                                          Instead of giving still more money to Elon Musk's scam.

                                          drewtowler@mas.toD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups