Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown.

People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
209 Posts 64 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • awws@mastodon.socialA awws@mastodon.social

    @CiaraNi not that I don’t believe you, since it did seem a bit far fetched, but provenance link on the analysis it’s A.I. generated?

    And yes, people sharing fair stuff is depressing. Why do people do this? I don’t get it.

    henryk@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    henryk@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    henryk@chaos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #25

    @awws @CiaraNi In this case it's mostly the other way round: The provenance trying to show that it's not A.I. was wrong. The instance I saw attributed it to a pair of photographers who actually do take these kind of bird photos. But misspelled his name. And it wasn't on the Facebook feed claimed to be from. And on photos he puts out, he embeds his logo. He's also relatively well-known. The chances of him taking *that* photo and not publishing it wide and proud with his branding are … slim.

    henryk@chaos.socialH ciarani@mastodon.greenC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

      @GOKUSHRM Agreed, that people should clearly flag AI-generated content as AI. We'll have to agree to disagree on the use of GAI in the first place. I choose not to use it voluntarily because I think it's unethical and unenvironmental.

      gokushrm@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      gokushrm@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      gokushrm@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #26

      @CiaraNi yup.. Everyone is there free to use whatever thay what to use, but atleast admit it clearly that we are using ai or anything.

      ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gokushrm@mastodon.socialG gokushrm@mastodon.social

        @CiaraNi yup.. Everyone is there free to use whatever thay what to use, but atleast admit it clearly that we are using ai or anything.

        ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
        ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
        ciarani@mastodon.green
        wrote last edited by
        #27

        @GOKUSHRM Yes, agreed!

        gokushrm@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • henryk@chaos.socialH henryk@chaos.social

          @awws @CiaraNi In this case it's mostly the other way round: The provenance trying to show that it's not A.I. was wrong. The instance I saw attributed it to a pair of photographers who actually do take these kind of bird photos. But misspelled his name. And it wasn't on the Facebook feed claimed to be from. And on photos he puts out, he embeds his logo. He's also relatively well-known. The chances of him taking *that* photo and not publishing it wide and proud with his branding are … slim.

          henryk@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          henryk@chaos.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          henryk@chaos.social
          wrote last edited by
          #28

          @awws @CiaraNi Which, IMHO, is the depressing part: Someone went to some troubles to lie about the provenance on purpose.

          Doing "Hey, check out this bird" is one thing. A "posted by $name on her Facebook" is quite another.

          ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tenpasttwo@mas.toT tenpasttwo@mas.to

            @CiaraNi I noticed this most quickly in the weird sections of Pinterest and YouTube, content on yetis, aliens and skeletons of giants became absolutely saturated by AI within what seemed only months. Appreciate that wasn't a highly integral area of photography even before AI, but still, in the last couple years it's been effectively killed off entirely.

            ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
            ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
            ciarani@mastodon.green
            wrote last edited by
            #29

            @TenPastTwo It's depressing! I am thinking back almost fondly to the not-long-ago days when a deceptive photo would have required actual Photoshop skills and visual artistry. Only a minority of people had access to a photo-editing program that was processional enough. Of them, only a minority had the skills to meddle with an image so well that other people wondered: 'is it real or not?' Generative AI is an entirely different problem, both the scale of the technology and the abuse of it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

              People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

              verenarupp@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
              verenarupp@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
              verenarupp@social.vivaldi.net
              wrote last edited by
              #30

              @CiaraNi I'm usually good at spotting AI, but that one looked so real.

              ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • henryk@chaos.socialH henryk@chaos.social

                @awws @CiaraNi In this case it's mostly the other way round: The provenance trying to show that it's not A.I. was wrong. The instance I saw attributed it to a pair of photographers who actually do take these kind of bird photos. But misspelled his name. And it wasn't on the Facebook feed claimed to be from. And on photos he puts out, he embeds his logo. He's also relatively well-known. The chances of him taking *that* photo and not publishing it wide and proud with his branding are … slim.

                ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                ciarani@mastodon.green
                wrote last edited by
                #31

                @henryk @awws That's a plausible and likely analysis. And it's depressing that we are even in this situation, where people have to spend time and energy trying to work out what's likely and real in the first place.

                awws@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • henryk@chaos.socialH henryk@chaos.social

                  @awws @CiaraNi Which, IMHO, is the depressing part: Someone went to some troubles to lie about the provenance on purpose.

                  Doing "Hey, check out this bird" is one thing. A "posted by $name on her Facebook" is quite another.

                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                  ciarani@mastodon.green
                  wrote last edited by
                  #32

                  @henryk @awws This thought has struck me too. The amount of effort some people put into posting other people's content and AI-generated content while passing it off as their own. It's a whole extra step. It feels like Twittery behaviour, more than Fediversy behaviour.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                    People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    wdeborger@toot.community
                    wrote last edited by
                    #33

                    @CiaraNi The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                    Search and social media companies selling your personal data is distressing. Politicians lying without repercussions. CEOs making fat bonuses at the detriment of the people they lead.

                    Industrial scale exploitation of the social fabric seems to be the way to get rich. If we let this continue, it will exhaust the social fabric and our civilization will come to a violent end.

                    I hope more people become aware

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • verenarupp@social.vivaldi.netV verenarupp@social.vivaldi.net

                      @CiaraNi I'm usually good at spotting AI, but that one looked so real.

                      ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                      ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                      ciarani@mastodon.green
                      wrote last edited by
                      #34

                      @VerenaRupp Agreed, it did look very real, from a technical point of view.

                      Please let me know if I am wrong about it being AI or an otherwise manipulated image. If it really is a real photo of a real water crown on a real bird, I want to correct my toot! (All this uncertainty in itself is part of the whole frustrating problem.)

                      stekopf@mstdn.socialS naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                        It's not, of course, generative AI that's deceiving people. It's the humans using AI to generate fake images and the humans who pass the fake images off as their own photos who are deceiving other humans.

                        ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                        ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                        ciarani@mastodon.green
                        wrote last edited by
                        #35

                        A few people have questioned whether I am right to say that the image of a drop of water bursting on a bird's head like a crown actually is AI-generated. They think I may be wrong. That it is not faked. That it is real.

                        If I'm wrong, if it really is an unmanipulated photo by a verified human photographer, please do let me know so that I can correct myself and my toot.

                        (All this uncertainty is part of the whole problem. We all spend so much human time & energy trying to act in good faith.)

                        geoffl@mastodon.me.ukG retech@corteximplant.comR stveje@mstdn.socialS drjlecter@beige.partyD jackeric@beige.partyJ 6 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                          @VerenaRupp Agreed, it did look very real, from a technical point of view.

                          Please let me know if I am wrong about it being AI or an otherwise manipulated image. If it really is a real photo of a real water crown on a real bird, I want to correct my toot! (All this uncertainty in itself is part of the whole frustrating problem.)

                          stekopf@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stekopf@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stekopf@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #36

                          @CiaraNi

                          So, you are not sure it is AI but state it as fact 🔝 nonetheless?

                          @VerenaRupp

                          ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                            People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                            O This user is from outside of this forum
                            O This user is from outside of this forum
                            ohildner@phpc.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #37

                            @CiaraNi After my first interaction in a thread here i got accused by a random member of this community of being a bot trying to "astroturf" and got blocked afterwards.
                            Did hurt me more than it should have to be honest.
                            It's crazy and sad times we live in.

                            ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                              People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                              kristinhenry@artatomic.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kristinhenry@artatomic.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kristinhenry@artatomic.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #38

                              @CiaraNi fuck ai and this very violating of public life and art. It's obscene and abusive on all levels.

                              ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • stekopf@mstdn.socialS stekopf@mstdn.social

                                @CiaraNi

                                So, you are not sure it is AI but state it as fact 🔝 nonetheless?

                                @VerenaRupp

                                ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                ciarani@mastodon.green
                                wrote last edited by
                                #39

                                @stekopf @VerenaRupp Everything points to it being AI (there are plausible reasons in the photo's thread and in this one.) I don't know how I can prove technically that it is not an AI image. A verified source for the actual photographer and original photo would prove it but nobody seems to have found one.

                                How do we prove something is or isn't AI in the absence of an original source?

                                Edit to add: I was sure. Until people started questioning me. Which made me unsure. This is the whole AI mess.

                                frutigeraero00@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                  @henryk @awws That's a plausible and likely analysis. And it's depressing that we are even in this situation, where people have to spend time and energy trying to work out what's likely and real in the first place.

                                  awws@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  awws@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  awws@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #40

                                  @CiaraNi @henryk Agreed. I don't know where people find the time or what exactly they get out of it doing it inside. Kinda sad, really.

                                  (though I guess there is also a part of me that *wanted* to believe someone had luckily caught a raindrop corwning a bird like that, cause it woulda been kinda awesome. 😊).

                                  ciarani@mastodon.greenC cppguy@infosec.spaceC 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • O ohildner@phpc.social

                                    @CiaraNi After my first interaction in a thread here i got accused by a random member of this community of being a bot trying to "astroturf" and got blocked afterwards.
                                    Did hurt me more than it should have to be honest.
                                    It's crazy and sad times we live in.

                                    ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ciarani@mastodon.greenC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ciarani@mastodon.green
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #41

                                    @ohildner Agreed, it's sad. It's distressing. Every time we get burned by an AI deception, every time we feel manipulated. We are on alert, and sometimes we get it wrong - we believe AI-generated content is real; we believe human-made content is AI-generated. We end up bickering at one another while the AI-makers sit on their piles of cash laughing at us.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                      @GOKUSHRM Yes, agreed!

                                      gokushrm@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gokushrm@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gokushrm@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #42

                                      @CiaraNi one more thing I want to mention here that we can't not stop AI involvement in our daily life because soon everything will be run by AI. We could resist for some time. So enjoy the resistance.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                        @Amorpheus @jwcph I think both parts are deception. Even without text explicitly claiming it was a photo, the person posting knows it is being presented as a photo and will be seen as a photo of a real moment in time.

                                        amorpheus@kind.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        amorpheus@kind.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        amorpheus@kind.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #43

                                        @CiaraNi @jwcph True. Still, the impact of the actual lie carried significantly more weight to it than the image itself.

                                        I first just saw the image and thought... "this looks way to perfect". Then I read the text and went to "unbelievable... what are the odds for such an event". Now I am like... "the written word seems to have more impact on my plausibility control than my imagery vision".

                                        ciarani@mastodon.greenC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ciarani@mastodon.greenC ciarani@mastodon.green

                                          People keep sharing an image of a bird with a drop of water bursting on its head like a crown. It's AI, but people share it in good faith, believing it’s an amazing photo by a human of a real bird in a real moment of time. Meanwhile, humans who have taken amazing photos of real birds captured in real moments of time, like a hummingbird in ballet with a butterfly, get questioned in good faith by people who are tired of being cheated by AI-deceit. The way AI has broken social trust is distressing.

                                          weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          weirdmustard@flipping.rocksW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          weirdmustard@flipping.rocks
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #44

                                          @CiaraNi We've started seeing rare species being uploaded to iNaturalist and other citizen science platforms and then it turns out it's AI and I just don't see whyyyy people are doing that. Like No, your AI imagination of a rare insect isn't just as good as someone finding a living specimen, what do you mean. Who profits from that. Who wants to see a "photo" of a fake bird. What's going on.

                                          ciarani@mastodon.greenC capnthommo@c.imC oisin@mastodon.ieO 3 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups