you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production
-
RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360
you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production
@colinstu So I really didn't need that university algorithms course after all?
-
RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360
you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production
Microsoft of the 1990s says hi -
RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360
you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production
@colinstu doesn't count if your program was correct.
-
@colinstu In the era of the first Pentium processors we had 8 MiB (yes, Mibi) of RAM do often, and 16 MiB the lucky ones.
Had a colleague who wrote a memory leaking application, because he wrote convoluted C++ code, instantiating too many out of control classes - the style that I would later witness with Java.
When he got a new job position he was triumphant: "Ha! Now I have a PC with 256 megs!".
He didn't realize that any space can be filled.@luc0x61 I had installed Linux on a machine with 16MB in 1995, started X, a web server and a Netware server. I had an bunch of terminal windows open. It wasn’t until I started another terminal window that I ran out of memory and found out that this Slackware version didn’t enable the swap correctly, so I had done all that without swap.
-
RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360
you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production
@colinstu you'd think with scarcity of RAM developers would refocus on writing more efficient code that can handle tasks with less RAM use.
but instead we get more vibe coding. -
@colinstu you'd think with scarcity of RAM developers would refocus on writing more efficient code that can handle tasks with less RAM use.
but instead we get more vibe coding.@colinstu of course we've long abandoned any pretenses that code needs to actually be useful and work for its intended use case. just more code for the code god.
-
D drajt@fosstodon.org shared this topic
-
RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360
you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production
@colinstu
C programming on 64KB w/Z80 cpu. -
RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360
you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production
@colinstu Wot happens if you tell an AI "see this code base? - make it do the same thing but a few orders of magnitude faster and cheaper".
-
@luc0x61 I had installed Linux on a machine with 16MB in 1995, started X, a web server and a Netware server. I had an bunch of terminal windows open. It wasn’t until I started another terminal window that I ran out of memory and found out that this Slackware version didn’t enable the swap correctly, so I had done all that without swap.
@ahltorp The first version of Linux I actually installed was from Lasermoon, an UK distributor, Linux-FT 1.x, and it did run on a 486 with 4 MiB RAM. We used it, along with early Slackware, on many 486 on static IPs to the net, for some time.
A colleague some 10thousand km from the office, one day that no one was noticing him online, logged on a machine to play the "when henry met sally" notable scene, on the speaker. That generated quite some hilarity in the silent office. -
@colinstu you'd think with scarcity of RAM developers would refocus on writing more efficient code that can handle tasks with less RAM use.
but instead we get more vibe coding.while this period sucks, i'm rather positive cause it seems that there is a growing interest at low code, optimization etc... I might be in a echo chamber as it is one of my interests, but as i'm spammed by vibe-code bros and like-it-or-not wannabee, i think it's legit.
-
-
RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360
you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production
@colinstu As someone who remembers packing bits and worrying about approaching address &A6F0, the reach for petabytes worries me that someone is doing it wrong.
-
@colinstu In the era of the first Pentium processors we had 8 MiB (yes, Mibi) of RAM do often, and 16 MiB the lucky ones.
Had a colleague who wrote a memory leaking application, because he wrote convoluted C++ code, instantiating too many out of control classes - the style that I would later witness with Java.
When he got a new job position he was triumphant: "Ha! Now I have a PC with 256 megs!".
He didn't realize that any space can be filled. -
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
