Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production

you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
16 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L luc0x61@mastodon.gamedev.place

    @colinstu In the era of the first Pentium processors we had 8 MiB (yes, Mibi) of RAM do often, and 16 MiB the lucky ones.
    Had a colleague who wrote a memory leaking application, because he wrote convoluted C++ code, instantiating too many out of control classes - the style that I would later witness with Java.
    When he got a new job position he was triumphant: "Ha! Now I have a PC with 256 megs!".
    He didn't realize that any space can be filled.

    ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
    ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
    ahltorp@mastodon.nu
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    @luc0x61 I had installed Linux on a machine with 16MB in 1995, started X, a web server and a Netware server. I had an bunch of terminal windows open. It wasn’t until I started another terminal window that I ran out of memory and found out that this Slackware version didn’t enable the swap correctly, so I had done all that without swap.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • colinstu@birdbutt.comC colinstu@birdbutt.com

      RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360

      you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production

      elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
      elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
      elexia@catcatnya.com
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      @colinstu you'd think with scarcity of RAM developers would refocus on writing more efficient code that can handle tasks with less RAM use.
      but instead we get more vibe coding.

      elexia@catcatnya.comE omar@mastodon.bsd.cafeO 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • elexia@catcatnya.comE elexia@catcatnya.com

        @colinstu you'd think with scarcity of RAM developers would refocus on writing more efficient code that can handle tasks with less RAM use.
        but instead we get more vibe coding.

        elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
        elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
        elexia@catcatnya.com
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        @colinstu of course we've long abandoned any pretenses that code needs to actually be useful and work for its intended use case. just more code for the code god.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • drajt@fosstodon.orgD drajt@fosstodon.org shared this topic
        • colinstu@birdbutt.comC colinstu@birdbutt.com

          RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360

          you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production

          stevewfolds@mastodon.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
          stevewfolds@mastodon.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
          stevewfolds@mastodon.world
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @colinstu
          C programming on 64KB w/Z80 cpu.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • colinstu@birdbutt.comC colinstu@birdbutt.com

            RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360

            you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production

            timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
            timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
            timwardcam@c.im
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @colinstu Wot happens if you tell an AI "see this code base? - make it do the same thing but a few orders of magnitude faster and cheaper".

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

              @luc0x61 I had installed Linux on a machine with 16MB in 1995, started X, a web server and a Netware server. I had an bunch of terminal windows open. It wasn’t until I started another terminal window that I ran out of memory and found out that this Slackware version didn’t enable the swap correctly, so I had done all that without swap.

              L This user is from outside of this forum
              L This user is from outside of this forum
              luc0x61@mastodon.gamedev.place
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @ahltorp The first version of Linux I actually installed was from Lasermoon, an UK distributor, Linux-FT 1.x, and it did run on a 486 with 4 MiB RAM. We used it, along with early Slackware, on many 486 on static IPs to the net, for some time.
              A colleague some 10thousand km from the office, one day that no one was noticing him online, logged on a machine to play the "when henry met sally" notable scene, on the speaker. That generated quite some hilarity in the silent office.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • elexia@catcatnya.comE elexia@catcatnya.com

                @colinstu you'd think with scarcity of RAM developers would refocus on writing more efficient code that can handle tasks with less RAM use.
                but instead we get more vibe coding.

                omar@mastodon.bsd.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
                omar@mastodon.bsd.cafeO This user is from outside of this forum
                omar@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @elexia @colinstu

                while this period sucks, i'm rather positive cause it seems that there is a growing interest at low code, optimization etc... I might be in a echo chamber as it is one of my interests, but as i'm spammed by vibe-code bros and like-it-or-not wannabee, i think it's legit.

                elexia@catcatnya.comE 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • omar@mastodon.bsd.cafeO omar@mastodon.bsd.cafe

                  @elexia @colinstu

                  while this period sucks, i'm rather positive cause it seems that there is a growing interest at low code, optimization etc... I might be in a echo chamber as it is one of my interests, but as i'm spammed by vibe-code bros and like-it-or-not wannabee, i think it's legit.

                  elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                  elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                  elexia@catcatnya.com
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @omar @colinstu one can only hope. not much of a computer toucher myself, especially these days, but I do have some interest and hope for a permacomputing movement that would align well with this, even if it's not looking like it will be a mainstream thing in the near future.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • colinstu@birdbutt.comC colinstu@birdbutt.com

                    RE: https://labyrinth.social/@nash/116178591588359360

                    you ever write code so inefficient you have to secure 80% of the world’s DRAM production

                    j5v@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    j5v@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    j5v@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @colinstu As someone who remembers packing bits and worrying about approaching address &A6F0, the reach for petabytes worries me that someone is doing it wrong.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L luc0x61@mastodon.gamedev.place

                      @colinstu In the era of the first Pentium processors we had 8 MiB (yes, Mibi) of RAM do often, and 16 MiB the lucky ones.
                      Had a colleague who wrote a memory leaking application, because he wrote convoluted C++ code, instantiating too many out of control classes - the style that I would later witness with Java.
                      When he got a new job position he was triumphant: "Ha! Now I have a PC with 256 megs!".
                      He didn't realize that any space can be filled.

                      cybeej@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cybeej@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cybeej@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @luc0x61 @colinstu @harald not can every space be filled, but every space WILL be filled.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups