Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io

    Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

    Link Preview Image
    djo85@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    djo85@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    djo85@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #17

    @thomasfuchs Under Enterprise Use Cases -

    Sanitary evacuation technologies - HIGH

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io

      Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

      Link Preview Image
      mattg@recurse.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mattg@recurse.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mattg@recurse.social
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      @thomasfuchs ok, but AI is already 100x more useful in a day than the metaverse was ever

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • avuko@infosec.exchangeA avuko@infosec.exchange

        @threatresearch @thomasfuchs

        That’s not AI. That’s your boss hiding behind AI.

        orb2069@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
        orb2069@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
        orb2069@mastodon.online
        wrote last edited by
        #19

        @avuko

        Blame shifting is one of the few actual uses of 'AI'.

        Link Preview Image
        Did AI kill 160 schoolgirls in Iran? US investigation reveals SHOCKING details, says AI may have identified school as 'legitimate' target due to… - News24 World

        The Shajareh Tayebeh Girls School in Minab city was among the first locations targeted in the joint US-Israeli strikes across Iran.

        favicon

        News24 (news24online.com)

        @threatresearch @thomasfuchs

        vampirdaddy@chaos.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • orb2069@mastodon.onlineO orb2069@mastodon.online

          @avuko

          Blame shifting is one of the few actual uses of 'AI'.

          Link Preview Image
          Did AI kill 160 schoolgirls in Iran? US investigation reveals SHOCKING details, says AI may have identified school as 'legitimate' target due to… - News24 World

          The Shajareh Tayebeh Girls School in Minab city was among the first locations targeted in the joint US-Israeli strikes across Iran.

          favicon

          News24 (news24online.com)

          @threatresearch @thomasfuchs

          vampirdaddy@chaos.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
          vampirdaddy@chaos.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
          vampirdaddy@chaos.social
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          @Orb2069
          @avuko @threatresearch @thomasfuchs

          I heard the school building had been a garrison years ago, but has undergone quite some change and construction work since then.

          I'd guess that chronological ordering is too far from the LLlM's principle of probabilistic guessing. Blind and reckless use of the wrong tool. Regardless of novelty admiration: if you bring your shiny new rotary tiller to surgery, there will be blood on the wall.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io

            Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

            Link Preview Image
            groxx@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
            groxx@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
            groxx@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            @thomasfuchs VR *banking* is highly likely???

            thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • groxx@hachyderm.ioG groxx@hachyderm.io

              @thomasfuchs VR *banking* is highly likely???

              thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
              thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
              thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              @groxx these consultants have their heads so far up their own asses than they can see light again

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io

                Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

                Link Preview Image
                filene@dragon.styleF This user is from outside of this forum
                filene@dragon.styleF This user is from outside of this forum
                filene@dragon.style
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                @thomasfuchs FYI, if my family had virtual access to community, entertainment, and employment, this might actually play out. Now, hard drives are expensive, jobs are being cut "due to AI [diversity/worker power]", and the programs I depend upon to get by are under attack. So I still need VR to be a reality, but only after the Real reality gets fixed. 🥺

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • danyork@mastodon.socialD danyork@mastodon.social

                  @thomasfuchs Ha! That’s awesome! Do you know what year that was published?

                  nieuemma@mastodon.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nieuemma@mastodon.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nieuemma@mastodon.de
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  @danyork @thomasfuchs McKinsey's "Value creation in the metaverse" is from November 2022. I'd guess this is a companion chart from that

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io

                    Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

                    Link Preview Image
                    iveyline@mastodon.nzI This user is from outside of this forum
                    iveyline@mastodon.nzI This user is from outside of this forum
                    iveyline@mastodon.nz
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    @thomasfuchs Great reminder that hype is just hype.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io

                      Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

                      Link Preview Image
                      bonno@mastodon-belgium.beB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bonno@mastodon-belgium.beB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bonno@mastodon-belgium.be
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      @thomasfuchs the metaverse was always just stupid. AI has real potential, it is currently very overhyped. But there will be significant business-use-cases in the future. Impact on employment is still a big question.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io

                        Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

                        Link Preview Image
                        pug50@toot.communityP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pug50@toot.communityP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pug50@toot.community
                        wrote last edited by
                        #27

                        @thomasfuchs and all the while, VRChat has been connecting (predominantly) furries since 2015 and will continue on. But with no hype, and no "impact potential".

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io

                          Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

                          Link Preview Image
                          malwareminigun@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                          malwareminigun@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                          malwareminigun@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #28

                          @thomasfuchs LLMs are way more useful than the metaverse ever was but the metaverse had a much more straightforward path to monetization... it's still not clear if people are going to be willing to path for what the LLMs actually cost given that all vendors are subsidizing the crap out of them with venture capital and investment right now.

                          metrobahn@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • thomasfuchs@hachyderm.ioT thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io

                            Remember that the same people say the same thing about AI

                            Link Preview Image
                            hakfoo@mstdn.partyH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hakfoo@mstdn.partyH This user is from outside of this forum
                            hakfoo@mstdn.party
                            wrote last edited by
                            #29

                            @thomasfuchs it's too bad the early 2020s version of the VR hype cycle took down AR, which did have some interesting use cases outside entertainment.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • malwareminigun@infosec.exchangeM malwareminigun@infosec.exchange

                              @thomasfuchs LLMs are way more useful than the metaverse ever was but the metaverse had a much more straightforward path to monetization... it's still not clear if people are going to be willing to path for what the LLMs actually cost given that all vendors are subsidizing the crap out of them with venture capital and investment right now.

                              metrobahn@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              metrobahn@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              metrobahn@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #30

                              @malwareminigun @thomasfuchs imo the strategy quite simply is to get people used to integrating LLMs into their workflow (or rather any tasks of their daily life) so deeply that once it's time to pay the full price there's no way they could let go

                              malwareminigun@infosec.exchangeM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • metrobahn@mastodon.socialM metrobahn@mastodon.social

                                @malwareminigun @thomasfuchs imo the strategy quite simply is to get people used to integrating LLMs into their workflow (or rather any tasks of their daily life) so deeply that once it's time to pay the full price there's no way they could let go

                                malwareminigun@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                malwareminigun@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                malwareminigun@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #31

                                @metrobahn I don’t think it’s that simple
                                1. There are a lot of competing vendors making similar products and if a vendor makes it cost what it actually costs people will just go to someone else.
                                2. Even some people who wouldn’t want to leave might see sticker shock when they’re paying hundreds of dollars a month.

                                I think all of these vendors are hoping that there will be some crazy efficiency improvement. That’s happened for some models, but hasn’t happened for frontier models. https://youtu.be/mRWLQGMGY80

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups