Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It's kind of amazing how many veteran Linux greyhairs I've seen, downstream of the age-check-in-systemd decision, saying well I guess I need to get comfortable with a BSD now.

It's kind of amazing how many veteran Linux greyhairs I've seen, downstream of the age-check-in-systemd decision, saying well I guess I need to get comfortable with a BSD now.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
77 Posts 43 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • airshipper@cloudisland.nzA airshipper@cloudisland.nz

    @mhoye we all wanted to use bsd all along it was just more convenient to use debian 🤷

    elilla@transmom.loveE This user is from outside of this forum
    elilla@transmom.loveE This user is from outside of this forum
    elilla@transmom.love
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    @airshipper @mhoye yeah the latest debian stable isn't even that stable anymore, I've been meaning to return to netbsd for a while now and with generative "AI" in the Linux kernel I——waitaminute did you say age verification in systemd

    airshipper@cloudisland.nzA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • elilla@transmom.loveE elilla@transmom.love

      @airshipper @mhoye yeah the latest debian stable isn't even that stable anymore, I've been meaning to return to netbsd for a while now and with generative "AI" in the Linux kernel I——waitaminute did you say age verification in systemd

      airshipper@cloudisland.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
      airshipper@cloudisland.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
      airshipper@cloudisland.nz
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      @elilla @mhoye running with a hacked systemd what could go wrong

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

        It's kind of amazing how many veteran Linux greyhairs I've seen, downstream of the age-check-in-systemd decision, saying well I guess I need to get comfortable with a BSD now. Thirty plus years of deep-grooved Debian/RedHat muscle memory to a one, quietly tidying up and looking for the exits.

        E This user is from outside of this forum
        E This user is from outside of this forum
        eigen@mattstodon.panar.ooo
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        @mhoye do you have any insight into how the hell the age check even made it a whole hour into Linux in the first place? It's possible I'm being hopelessly naïve here, but I really thought every Linux user/admin/programmer/whoever would've literally rioted in the streets before countenancing anything remotely like it.

        womble@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW wordshaper@weatherishappening.network

          @mhoye That's the interesting thing about being a greyhair in this industry. You've used enough different things to know they're all kinda crap and any kind of emotional buy-in to a piece of software isn't worth it because they all kinda suck in the end.

          Plus, y'know, no matter how annoying switching might be, at least you're not using AIX so it could be worse.

          mikestok@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
          mikestok@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
          mikestok@mstdn.ca
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          @wordshaper @mhoye @algernon AIX had smit. That was a really great idea. I was a big fan of the 6150.

          wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mikestok@mstdn.caM mikestok@mstdn.ca

            @wordshaper @mhoye @algernon AIX had smit. That was a really great idea. I was a big fan of the 6150.

            wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
            wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW This user is from outside of this forum
            wordshaper@weatherishappening.network
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            @MikeStok @mhoye @algernon AIX had a #pragma in its C++ compiler to raise the default maximum length for a mangled symbol... in case the default 32k was too short. (And don't even get me started about its abomination of a linker)

            mikestok@mstdn.caM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • wordshaper@weatherishappening.networkW wordshaper@weatherishappening.network

              @MikeStok @mhoye @algernon AIX had a #pragma in its C++ compiler to raise the default maximum length for a mangled symbol... in case the default 32k was too short. (And don't even get me started about its abomination of a linker)

              mikestok@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
              mikestok@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
              mikestok@mstdn.ca
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              @wordshaper @mhoye @algernon let me suggest that C++ was the problem 😉 A proper OO response would have been to make the symbol table entries an s-expression, but if they had done that we wouldn’t have needed Perl.

              mikestok@mstdn.caM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mikestok@mstdn.caM mikestok@mstdn.ca

                @wordshaper @mhoye @algernon let me suggest that C++ was the problem 😉 A proper OO response would have been to make the symbol table entries an s-expression, but if they had done that we wouldn’t have needed Perl.

                mikestok@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                mikestok@mstdn.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                mikestok@mstdn.ca
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                @wordshaper @mhoye @algernon the whole idea of binding before run time seems shockingly primitive and premature.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                  It's kind of amazing how many veteran Linux greyhairs I've seen, downstream of the age-check-in-systemd decision, saying well I guess I need to get comfortable with a BSD now. Thirty plus years of deep-grooved Debian/RedHat muscle memory to a one, quietly tidying up and looking for the exits.

                  llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                  llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                  llorenzin@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  @mhoye I'm looking seriously at Alpine Linux vs Devuan... We had to rebuild our internal server recently (which had been happily running CentOS 4 for over a decade, we are not power users), and it was a total PITA - systemd is a shitshow even without this age nonsense. I'm too old and too cranky to be excited about learning a new distro, but here I am.

                  waffles@masto.yttrx.comW ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF mhoye@cosocial.caM 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                    It's kind of amazing how many veteran Linux greyhairs I've seen, downstream of the age-check-in-systemd decision, saying well I guess I need to get comfortable with a BSD now. Thirty plus years of deep-grooved Debian/RedHat muscle memory to a one, quietly tidying up and looking for the exits.

                    ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                    ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                    ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    @mhoye@cosocial.ca

                    Unfortunately, my customers are all on ELx and likely to remain that way for their non-containerized workloads (compliance requirements). I need to stay "in practice" so, moving off Linux is, effectively, a non-option for me (basically why, back in my Solaris admin days, I use Solaris x86 and OpenSolaris at home).

                    Maybe once I retire.

                    sen@hachyderm.ioS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL llorenzin@infosec.exchange

                      @mhoye I'm looking seriously at Alpine Linux vs Devuan... We had to rebuild our internal server recently (which had been happily running CentOS 4 for over a decade, we are not power users), and it was a total PITA - systemd is a shitshow even without this age nonsense. I'm too old and too cranky to be excited about learning a new distro, but here I am.

                      waffles@masto.yttrx.comW This user is from outside of this forum
                      waffles@masto.yttrx.comW This user is from outside of this forum
                      waffles@masto.yttrx.com
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      @llorenzin @mhoye hahahaha I was on the “operating systems” team at my work when we did the fleet upgrade from centos 5 to 6. Getting several million servers moved from artisanal bash script to systemd was a lot of fun and everyone was so pissed about having to upgrade 😅😅😅

                      But we were starting to mandate cgroup hierarchies so away we went.

                      llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL llorenzin@infosec.exchange

                        @mhoye I'm looking seriously at Alpine Linux vs Devuan... We had to rebuild our internal server recently (which had been happily running CentOS 4 for over a decade, we are not power users), and it was a total PITA - systemd is a shitshow even without this age nonsense. I'm too old and too cranky to be excited about learning a new distro, but here I am.

                        ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                        ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
                        ferricoxide@blahaj.zone
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        @llorenzin@infosec.exchange @mhoye@cosocial.ca

                        Recently had to update because y'all were running an OS that EOLed nearly a decade and a half ago. Lulz. 🙂

                        llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                        • paul@notnull.spaceP paul@notnull.space

                          @mhoye I still don't see how something like this could possibly be made to work.

                          Windows, Mac, fine - stop a service running and the whole thing crashes, but open source OSes, almost by definition, are about user choice. Don't want something running in the background? Fine turn it off, no bother.

                          If age verification is required, but likely is going to be on device, then we'll just make a service that says "Yes, over 18" when asked.
                          If age verification requires a third party cloud service, then well done they've just broken the internet.

                          aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aburka@hachyderm.ioA This user is from outside of this forum
                          aburka@hachyderm.io
                          wrote last edited by
                          #43

                          @paul @mhoye except systemd has spent the last years working its way into becoming exactly that kind of essential service

                          paul@notnull.spaceP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

                            @foolishowl @mhoye When linux was only a thing that programmers, system administrators, and other techy types used, the assumption that everyone could/should be their own sysadmin made more sense - everyone could be assumed to have some tech proficiency, b/c if they didn't, they would still be on DOS/windows anyway.
                            That hasn't been a safe assumption to make about users for ~20 years though, unless you're a distro like slackware or gentoo that is explicitly not aiming at wide general adoption.

                            foolishowl@social.coopF This user is from outside of this forum
                            foolishowl@social.coopF This user is from outside of this forum
                            foolishowl@social.coop
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44

                            @miss_rodent @mhoye I'm thinking of experiences with activist groups in the last few years. There are tensions between leaving things to the tech people in the group, or avoiding that by going with commercial services that appear easier to implement. Technology decisions can have a disproportionate effect on how an organization functions, and it's a challenge for tech people in an activist group to be careful about ethics.

                            I haven't seen an easy solution to that problem. But Google et al are only too happy to advertise that they have easy solutions.

                            miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • foolishowl@social.coopF foolishowl@social.coop

                              @miss_rodent @mhoye I'm thinking of experiences with activist groups in the last few years. There are tensions between leaving things to the tech people in the group, or avoiding that by going with commercial services that appear easier to implement. Technology decisions can have a disproportionate effect on how an organization functions, and it's a challenge for tech people in an activist group to be careful about ethics.

                              I haven't seen an easy solution to that problem. But Google et al are only too happy to advertise that they have easy solutions.

                              miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                              miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                              miss_rodent@girlcock.club
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              @foolishowl @mhoye Yeah, honestly activist groups in particular benefit a lot from having their own tech solutions, b/c relying on corporate options is a major liability. For groups/communities, though, not *everyone* needs to be techy, just, enough people that they can host & maintain the stuff the group needs. In general, for activist groups, the 'easy corporate option' are the most likely to get people arrested, work with anti-dissent efforts, etc., plus the mess of ethical problems they >

                              miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM miss_rodent@girlcock.club

                                @foolishowl @mhoye Yeah, honestly activist groups in particular benefit a lot from having their own tech solutions, b/c relying on corporate options is a major liability. For groups/communities, though, not *everyone* needs to be techy, just, enough people that they can host & maintain the stuff the group needs. In general, for activist groups, the 'easy corporate option' are the most likely to get people arrested, work with anti-dissent efforts, etc., plus the mess of ethical problems they >

                                miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                                miss_rodent@girlcock.clubM This user is from outside of this forum
                                miss_rodent@girlcock.club
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                @foolishowl @mhoye tend to come with.
                                It's often a case where taking the harder option is better, even if the easy option is easier.
                                Google might advertize an easier solution - and maybe they even have one - but is the work it saves worth having your comrades arrested, fined, tracked, etc.? Is it worth giving money to an organization actively working against your goals, thus making your life harder anyway?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • waffles@masto.yttrx.comW waffles@masto.yttrx.com

                                  @llorenzin @mhoye hahahaha I was on the “operating systems” team at my work when we did the fleet upgrade from centos 5 to 6. Getting several million servers moved from artisanal bash script to systemd was a lot of fun and everyone was so pissed about having to upgrade 😅😅😅

                                  But we were starting to mandate cgroup hierarchies so away we went.

                                  llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  llorenzin@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47

                                  @waffles @mhoye cannot even imagine. I bet you have some *amazing* war stories from that one...

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ferricoxide@blahaj.zoneF ferricoxide@blahaj.zone

                                    @llorenzin@infosec.exchange @mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                    Recently had to update because y'all were running an OS that EOLed nearly a decade and a half ago. Lulz. 🙂

                                    llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    llorenzin@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48

                                    @ferricoxide @mhoye hey, this is the *entire* reason I run Linux! It was internal, never got anywhere near the Internet, just happily chugged along in the basement. If it ain't broke...
                                    (We finally upgraded because I realized how old the hard drives were and how very much borrowed time we were living on.)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      llorenzin@infosec.exchange
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      @ferricoxide @mhoye oh, I feel that. I used to cover LatAm - we had customers there still running Windows NT 4 (*outside* of critical infrastructure) well into the 20-teens...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • llorenzin@infosec.exchangeL llorenzin@infosec.exchange

                                        @mhoye I'm looking seriously at Alpine Linux vs Devuan... We had to rebuild our internal server recently (which had been happily running CentOS 4 for over a decade, we are not power users), and it was a total PITA - systemd is a shitshow even without this age nonsense. I'm too old and too cranky to be excited about learning a new distro, but here I am.

                                        mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mhoye@cosocial.ca
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #50

                                        @llorenzin If I was building containers or basic infra right now, alpine is decisively minimalist in terms of both system requirements and drama.

                                        K deutrino@mstdn.ioD 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                          It's kind of amazing how many veteran Linux greyhairs I've seen, downstream of the age-check-in-systemd decision, saying well I guess I need to get comfortable with a BSD now. Thirty plus years of deep-grooved Debian/RedHat muscle memory to a one, quietly tidying up and looking for the exits.

                                          mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mason@partychickens.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mason@partychickens.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #51

                                          @mhoye Not that the BSDs are in any way a bad option, but don't forget that it's entirely reasonable to use Debian without systemd. I'm doing it now.

                                          It's well-supported by active volunteers:

                                          https://packages.debian.org/trixie/sysvinit-core

                                          And there are other good options: Slackware and Alpine stand out. Gentoo is a bit heavy with its config syntax, but it's a super solid option.

                                          mcc@mastodon.socialM kaidenshi@exquisite.socialK 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups