Welcome Anthropic as a Corporate Patron sponsor of the Blender Foundation’s Development Fund!

[lambdacalculus@masto.hackers.town]

@Blender WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU IDIOTS!?!?

[d_prieto@peoplemaking.games]

@Blender not a good idea

[jackemled@furry.engineer]

@Blender Slop money! I had better expectations of Blender.

[weirdwriter@caneandable.social]

The frustrating thing is you know people had meetings about this and they were all yeah let's do this. Ugh! @jwcph @Blender

[damonwakes@mastodon.sdf.org]

@Blender The new version eliminates a "Welcome." I think we were all hoping you would eliminate the sponsor.

[tuxwise@infosec.exchange]

@Blender

Blood money, made by proudly supporting maiming and killing.

Removed Blender from our list of recommended FLOSS.

[pierrodu21@mstdn.social]

@Blender eeewwwww 🤮

[bitchboss@marcella.masto.host]

@Blender

When money talks, bullshit walks.
Lemme bullshit'n elsewhere now.

[mxchara@seattle.pink]

@Blender you fucked up

[angiebaby@mas.to]

@Blender

Cool. Another great open source project chasing after the elusive snake oil grift. Vibe code your own demise.

[felurx@troet.cafe]

@Blender I genuinely don't think that "yeah we don't like what they want to do with Blender either but it's important for software freedom that we take their sponsorship and promote their brand" is a good argument.
Yes, free software means that anyone can do what they like with it, but I don't think that it has to mean that you have to actively enable uses that are "not aligned with your mission". Not even if you get money for it, and not even if other uses benefit from it too.

[sb@metroholografix.ca]

@Blender
Booooooooooooooooooooo!!!

[rapsneezy2@mastodon.social]

@Blender

It's not about influence on code.

How many Palestinian or Iranian babies needed to have their brains sprayed across concrete rubble in order for Anthropic to pay for 2 blender developers?

#blender #b3d #blender3d #genocide #tech #ooensource #usempire #gaza #iran

[mxchara@seattle.pink]

@Blender you know, Blender...dirty money is dirty. no amount of rewording is going to fix that. there's no lawyerly way you're wriggling out of this mistake.

You've aligned yourself with destroyers.

[shadedlady@mstdn.social]

@Blender not helping

[boydstephensmithjr@hachyderm.io]

@danana_dread @Blender

> Taking the US Military Industrial Complex's blood money is reason enough to switch tools.

Taking resources away from bad organizations is a good thing. If the only thing the US MIC gets from Blender is "legitimacy", I'm fine with that. We can reassess if/when the US MIC's legitimacy is less universal.

> Giving corporate AI slop-peddlers influence over what features the devs are to prioritize

Yeah, that's not good. The slop peddlers are just going to make things worse while illegally extracting all they can from the commons.

[ronanmcd@mastodon.green]

@Blender "oh no it's cool guys they will only be working on our internal code, totally not stealing art and ideas" that's ok then, it's only the same Anthropic who deleted all of PocketOS including their backup code

[joshaspinall@mstdn.social]

@Blender Uuuuuuuuuuuugggghhhhh......

[ronanmcd@mastodon.green]

@cmccullough I was about to start. I guess I'll have a small bit more free time now

[solitha@mastodon.social]

@t_robinart I can't speak for him but, as a native English speaker, this is my own interpretation.

Corporate sponsors often bring some sort of terms with them. The idiom is "with strings attached."

I understand the "balance" to be between that, and individual donations from the users that Blender serves.

Problem is, they may lose a lot of individual donors over this, which could upset that balance. I think @fsiddi needs to grasp that genAI/LLM companies are unacceptably toxic.

@keeya