Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A world without privacy is also a world without intimacy, without individuality, without diversity, and without democracy.

A world without privacy is also a world without intimacy, without individuality, without diversity, and without democracy.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
privacymasssurveillancauthoritarianisageverification
18 Posts 14 Posters 24 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • monkeyben@mastodon.sdf.orgM monkeyben@mastodon.sdf.org

    @arafel

    As shown by Bezos 30 foot hedges he pays $1000 dollars in fines each month for and the servants passages his house has.

    @Em0nM4stodon

    arafel@mas.toA This user is from outside of this forum
    arafel@mas.toA This user is from outside of this forum
    arafel@mas.to
    wrote last edited by
    #9

    @monkeyben @Em0nM4stodon Yeah, that’s the thing with absolute fines, past a certain point people just don’t notice them. One advantage the GDPR has, for any other faults.

    arafel@mas.toA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange

      A world without privacy is also a world without intimacy, without individuality, without diversity, and without democracy.

      Certain politicians have clearly expressed they want a world without privacy.

      We cannot let them have it passively. We must fight back for our rights. Now.

      Or we will lose them.

      #Privacy #MassSurveillance #Authoritarianism #AgeVerification

      eighteyes@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
      eighteyes@hachyderm.ioE This user is from outside of this forum
      eighteyes@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #10

      @Em0nM4stodon How do we reconcile our desire for privacy with the need to be seen in an attention-based economy? I asked Richard Stallman this question and he had no answer for me.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange

        A world without privacy is also a world without intimacy, without individuality, without diversity, and without democracy.

        Certain politicians have clearly expressed they want a world without privacy.

        We cannot let them have it passively. We must fight back for our rights. Now.

        Or we will lose them.

        #Privacy #MassSurveillance #Authoritarianism #AgeVerification

        tankgrrl@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
        tankgrrl@hachyderm.ioT This user is from outside of this forum
        tankgrrl@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #11

        @Em0nM4stodon Those same politicians get indignant when THEY are the ones being surveilled.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • reggiehere@mastodon.socialR reggiehere@mastodon.social

          @Em0nM4stodon

          Politicians and billionaires want a world without privacy for us but not for them.

          They consider themselves above everyone else.

          n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
          n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
          n_dimension@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #12

          @Em0nM4stodon @ReggieHere

          (1m 20s)
          https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FBpJkVdT2Jg

          #privacy #privacymatters

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange

            A world without privacy is also a world without intimacy, without individuality, without diversity, and without democracy.

            Certain politicians have clearly expressed they want a world without privacy.

            We cannot let them have it passively. We must fight back for our rights. Now.

            Or we will lose them.

            #Privacy #MassSurveillance #Authoritarianism #AgeVerification

            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            dalias@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #13

            @Em0nM4stodon Thank you! I have an old thread from I should dig up and republish about that: how lack of privacy destroys intimacy, by making it impossible to talk with the people you want that intimacy with because you're always considering what others who are listening in will do with the knowledge of your conversations.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
            • arafel@mas.toA arafel@mas.to

              @monkeyben @Em0nM4stodon Yeah, that’s the thing with absolute fines, past a certain point people just don’t notice them. One advantage the GDPR has, for any other faults.

              arafel@mas.toA This user is from outside of this forum
              arafel@mas.toA This user is from outside of this forum
              arafel@mas.to
              wrote last edited by
              #14

              @monkeyben @Em0nM4stodon I’m actually thinking maybe doubling the fine each time, for something like this (Bezos and trees he shouldn’t have). He’ll happily ignore the first $1000, even maybe the first year up to two million. Midway through the second year, when it’s up to $131 million, he might notice. End of year two, at $8 billion, I’m sure he would.

              monkeyben@mastodon.sdf.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange

                A world without privacy is also a world without intimacy, without individuality, without diversity, and without democracy.

                Certain politicians have clearly expressed they want a world without privacy.

                We cannot let them have it passively. We must fight back for our rights. Now.

                Or we will lose them.

                #Privacy #MassSurveillance #Authoritarianism #AgeVerification

                luna@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                luna@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                luna@mastodon.world
                wrote last edited by
                #15

                @Em0nM4stodon Unplugging and moving to a cabin in the woods is preferable to living in a digital panoptican and I like technology.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • arafel@mas.toA arafel@mas.to

                  @monkeyben @Em0nM4stodon I’m actually thinking maybe doubling the fine each time, for something like this (Bezos and trees he shouldn’t have). He’ll happily ignore the first $1000, even maybe the first year up to two million. Midway through the second year, when it’s up to $131 million, he might notice. End of year two, at $8 billion, I’m sure he would.

                  monkeyben@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                  monkeyben@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                  monkeyben@mastodon.sdf.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #16

                  @arafel

                  That sounds like a really good idea 🙂

                  @Em0nM4stodon

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                    em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
                    em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #17

                    @benh 💚

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • bicipoiesis@layer8.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bicipoiesis@layer8.spaceB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bicipoiesis@layer8.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #18

                      @benh @Em0nM4stodon
                      "Too many wrongly characterize the debate as “security versus privacy.” The real choice is liberty versus control. Tyranny, whether it arises under threat of foreign physical attack or under constant domestic authoritative scrutiny, is still tyranny. #Liberty requires #security without intrusion, security plus #privacy. Widespread police surveillance is the very definition of a police state. And that’s why we should champion privacy even when we have nothing to hide."

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups