Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "I just found out that it's been hallucinating numbers this entire time."

"I just found out that it's been hallucinating numbers this entire time."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
techagenticai
157 Posts 132 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • lxskllr@mastodon.worldL lxskllr@mastodon.world

    @Natasha_Jay

    What would be amusing is them having greater success using bullshit data than whoever was previously correlating stuff :^D

    greatbigtable@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    greatbigtable@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    greatbigtable@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #52

    @lxskllr more likely it will have similar results to that of the media industry who changed their entire industry based on fake data provided to them by Facebook.

    ktneely@infosec.exchangeK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • erikjonker@mastodon.socialE erikjonker@mastodon.social

      @Natasha_Jay .. and you really want to blame the technology for this... If there was no process for checking the facts that were used , it is simply bad implementation, everyone knows you have to check for or do something against hallucinations with GenAI.

      greatbigtable@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      greatbigtable@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      greatbigtable@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #53

      @ErikJonker then where's the productivity gain promised with AI if you still have to do the work to get the numbers you trust? Why take on the additional cost at that point?

      If you had an employee who was constantly lying to you, you'd fire them.

      erikjonker@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jmcclure@sciences.socialJ jmcclure@sciences.social

        @Natasha_Jay

        "... just inventing plausible sounding [answers]"

        This shit is so tiring - that is literally all any AI is even *meant* to do. They are not even designed to give correct answers to questions, but just examples of what a plausible answer could sound like.

        (edit: sorry, I know I'm likely preaching to the choir here, but it's just so fucking tiring seeing people surprised by this crap.)

        greatbigtable@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        greatbigtable@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        greatbigtable@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #54

        @jmcclure so many people don't understand this.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • greatbigtable@mastodon.socialG greatbigtable@mastodon.social

          @ErikJonker then where's the productivity gain promised with AI if you still have to do the work to get the numbers you trust? Why take on the additional cost at that point?

          If you had an employee who was constantly lying to you, you'd fire them.

          erikjonker@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          erikjonker@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          erikjonker@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #55

          @GreatBigTable also true, you have to make a rational business decision, as with every other technology

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • patrickpoet@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            patrickpoet@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            patrickpoet@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #56

            @Natasha_Jay this can't be real, right? Everyone knows AI isn't ready for any mission critical stuff right now (probably years away)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mike@thecanadian.social
              wrote last edited by
              #57

              @Natasha_Jay "Trust but verify" - Old KGB proverb

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 0x0ddc0ffee@infosec.exchange0 0x0ddc0ffee@infosec.exchange

                @Natasha_Jay I suspect that one of the few applications where a heavily hallucinating LLM can outperform a human would be in replacing board members, C-suite executives, and their direct reports. I propose a longitudinal study with a control group of high level executives using real data, and experimental group using hallucinated, or maybe even totally random data filtered into plausible ranges, using executive compensation deltas as the metric.

                longobord@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                longobord@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                longobord@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #58

                @0x0ddc0ffee @Natasha_Jay I would LOVE to see the resultant shareholder suit over an AI board. There's a long list of duties they are required to perform. Seeing, for example, how the courts would deal with the duty of care or the business judgement rule. OK, the business judgement rule may be handled better by the AI, but... a shareholder would still have them on the duty of care.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • indigoviolet@tech.lgbtI indigoviolet@tech.lgbt

                  @drahardja @Natasha_Jay I believe it’s supposed to be h*tt*ps

                  drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  drahardja@sfba.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #59

                  @indigoviolet I change it to hxxps when I want to link to a site that not everyone wants to visit.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • catbrainz@retro.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                    catbrainz@retro.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                    catbrainz@retro.pizza
                    wrote last edited by
                    #60

                    @Natasha_Jay what seemed crazy to me reading the comments on the reddit post is that so many answers were like "no you can't do it that way, you need to <bunch of extra, convoluted and unnecessary work> to use that tool properly in that context" and to me it's like ok so.....you have to jump through all those hoops to justify using a tool that doesn't actually make anything easier for you.....why? To look like you're following innovation? God I'm glad I no longer work anywhere remotely related to tech right now.

                    glyph@mastodon.socialG catbrainz@retro.pizzaC 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • greatbigtable@mastodon.socialG greatbigtable@mastodon.social

                      @lxskllr more likely it will have similar results to that of the media industry who changed their entire industry based on fake data provided to them by Facebook.

                      ktneely@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
                      ktneely@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
                      ktneely@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #61

                      @lxskllr @GreatBigTable meh, they've probably been fabricating data for the board long before generative AI hit the scene. The only difference is that now they have a scape goat.

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • labbatt50@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                        labbatt50@mastodon.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                        labbatt50@mastodon.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #62

                        @Natasha_Jay

                        Someone who knows the systems MUST Proofread ¨everything" that your ai spits out at you.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • drsuzanne@ohai.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          drsuzanne@ohai.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                          drsuzanne@ohai.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #63

                          @Natasha_Jay if you’re going along with the personification of a technological system, then I just don’t know what to tell that guy.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • bnlandor@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bnlandor@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bnlandor@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #64

                            @Natasha_Jay How does anyone think LLMs base anything on facts or data? They are plausabiliy machines, designed to flood the zone.

                            rozeboosje@masto.aiR 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • negative12dollarbill@techhub.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              negative12dollarbill@techhub.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              negative12dollarbill@techhub.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #65

                              @Natasha_Jay I don't understand how anybody can read the news about "AI" day after day and think "Oh everyone else's AI is fabricating random bullshit 24/7, but ours is fine".

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • diekehrseite@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                diekehrseite@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                diekehrseite@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #66

                                @Natasha_Jay what? noooo! 😄

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • m1rk0@social.defcon42.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  m1rk0@social.defcon42.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  m1rk0@social.defcon42.net
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #67

                                  @Natasha_Jay (Maybe) Learning it the hard way. Well deserved.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • nickboss@defcon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nickboss@defcon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nickboss@defcon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #68

                                    @Natasha_Jay

                                    The only use of ai my company has successfully implemented is having it write emails to dead leads.

                                    quantillion@mstdn.ioQ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • rikuylonen@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rikuylonen@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rikuylonen@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #69

                                      @Natasha_Jay Does AI Count Virtual Sheeps To Fall Sleep, an unknown work of Philip K Dick.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mercg@mindly.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mercg@mindly.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mercg@mindly.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #70

                                        @Natasha_Jay

                                        ngl this stirred my loins

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #71

                                          @Natasha_Jay

                                          The game of "passing the buck" on this one will be interesting. Hopefully those numbers are at least approximately correct.

                                          bruce@darkmoon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups