Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I think we have to start looking at dual-class stock structures at a technology vendor as a form of third-party risk.

I think we have to start looking at dual-class stock structures at a technology vendor as a form of third-party risk.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
1 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • danielkennedy74@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    danielkennedy74@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
    danielkennedy74@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I think we have to start looking at dual-class stock structures at a technology vendor as a form of third-party risk.

    If a firm's leadership is, in a practical sense, never accountable to stock holders, customers, employees, or their own Board, how are they accountable to their own decision making?

    How does that affect their willingness to take potentially irresponsible risks?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups