<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I think we have to start looking at dual-class stock structures at a technology vendor as a form of third-party risk.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I think we have to start looking at dual-class stock structures at a technology vendor as a form of third-party risk. </p><p>If a firm's leadership is, in a practical sense, never accountable to stock holders, customers, employees, or their own Board, how are they accountable to their own decision making? </p><p>How does that affect their willingness to take potentially irresponsible risks?</p>]]></description><link>https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/f9888959-6ec2-48f9-96c5-c0f35dc27446/i-think-we-have-to-start-looking-at-dual-class-stock-structures-at-a-technology-vendor-as-a-form-of-third-party-risk.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 09:22:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://board.circlewithadot.net/topic/f9888959-6ec2-48f9-96c5-c0f35dc27446.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:05:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>