Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Wondering if anyone has reliable info on the following and would like to share it.

Wondering if anyone has reliable info on the following and would like to share it.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
8 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cure53@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Wondering if anyone has reliable info on the following and would like to share it.

    Grok, the LLM used by X, now seems to claim that E. Musk never sent any inflammatory messages on June 5 2025 about Trump's involvement on Epstein's Island. Which he probably did.

    We cannot fact-check this as we have, obviously, no X Premium account. But, if true, this should be a pretty huge issue, no?

    cure53@infosec.exchangeC yonk@chaos.socialY 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
    • cure53@infosec.exchangeC cure53@infosec.exchange

      Wondering if anyone has reliable info on the following and would like to share it.

      Grok, the LLM used by X, now seems to claim that E. Musk never sent any inflammatory messages on June 5 2025 about Trump's involvement on Epstein's Island. Which he probably did.

      We cannot fact-check this as we have, obviously, no X Premium account. But, if true, this should be a pretty huge issue, no?

      cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      cure53@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      And, asking from a broader perspective outside this specific scope, are there any other proven cases about LLM fine-tuning being used to alter rhe past and present and faux historical timelines?

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • cure53@infosec.exchangeC cure53@infosec.exchange

        Wondering if anyone has reliable info on the following and would like to share it.

        Grok, the LLM used by X, now seems to claim that E. Musk never sent any inflammatory messages on June 5 2025 about Trump's involvement on Epstein's Island. Which he probably did.

        We cannot fact-check this as we have, obviously, no X Premium account. But, if true, this should be a pretty huge issue, no?

        yonk@chaos.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
        yonk@chaos.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
        yonk@chaos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @cure53

        I just used Grok 4.1 Fast via Kagi assistant to quickly check this:

        https://kagi.com/assistant/ab160f6d-a886-45ac-b104-ebbb43ec9f6e

        So it indeed says that the inflammatory messages are false rumors that have been debunked. It even claims that Donald Trump and Elon Musk are friendly, making this unlikely.

        But the messages have been reported by multiple news outlets, e.g.:

        https://abcnews.com/Politics/musk-appears-delete-posts-claiming-trump-epstein-files/story?id=122609304

        https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexalisitza/elon-musk-donald-trump-epstein-tweet

        cure53@infosec.exchangeC 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • yonk@chaos.socialY yonk@chaos.social

          @cure53

          I just used Grok 4.1 Fast via Kagi assistant to quickly check this:

          https://kagi.com/assistant/ab160f6d-a886-45ac-b104-ebbb43ec9f6e

          So it indeed says that the inflammatory messages are false rumors that have been debunked. It even claims that Donald Trump and Elon Musk are friendly, making this unlikely.

          But the messages have been reported by multiple news outlets, e.g.:

          https://abcnews.com/Politics/musk-appears-delete-posts-claiming-trump-epstein-files/story?id=122609304

          https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexalisitza/elon-musk-donald-trump-epstein-tweet

          cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
          cure53@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @yonk thank you very much ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • yonk@chaos.socialY yonk@chaos.social

            @cure53

            I just used Grok 4.1 Fast via Kagi assistant to quickly check this:

            https://kagi.com/assistant/ab160f6d-a886-45ac-b104-ebbb43ec9f6e

            So it indeed says that the inflammatory messages are false rumors that have been debunked. It even claims that Donald Trump and Elon Musk are friendly, making this unlikely.

            But the messages have been reported by multiple news outlets, e.g.:

            https://abcnews.com/Politics/musk-appears-delete-posts-claiming-trump-epstein-files/story?id=122609304

            https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexalisitza/elon-musk-donald-trump-epstein-tweet

            cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cure53@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            RE: https://chaos.social/@yonk/116390461628017649

            @yonk Thanks a lot! So, can we infer from this case that history is being altered already to fit radical political agendas, and it happens right before our eyes, without any larger repercussions?

            yonk@chaos.socialY 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cure53@infosec.exchangeC cure53@infosec.exchange

              RE: https://chaos.social/@yonk/116390461628017649

              @yonk Thanks a lot! So, can we infer from this case that history is being altered already to fit radical political agendas, and it happens right before our eyes, without any larger repercussions?

              yonk@chaos.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
              yonk@chaos.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
              yonk@chaos.social
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @cure53 on the other hand, it does not seem to be Grok specific. Other models available also make the same claim that there is no verified evidence:

              GLM-5:

              https://kagi.com/assistant/c73a318d-8dde-4be1-84c0-1cfc4fbb83da

              Kimi 2.5 (although it states its cutoff date is early 2025, so that would make sense):

              https://kagi.com/assistant/8c914c4b-c78d-40d9-90cd-0860a42817a8

              Deep seek v3:

              https://kagi.com/assistant/9201074a-79b2-45e4-b5ee-529a990b7188

              So I donโ€™t think that we can conclude that Grok was altered specifically.

              cure53@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • yonk@chaos.socialY yonk@chaos.social

                @cure53 on the other hand, it does not seem to be Grok specific. Other models available also make the same claim that there is no verified evidence:

                GLM-5:

                https://kagi.com/assistant/c73a318d-8dde-4be1-84c0-1cfc4fbb83da

                Kimi 2.5 (although it states its cutoff date is early 2025, so that would make sense):

                https://kagi.com/assistant/8c914c4b-c78d-40d9-90cd-0860a42817a8

                Deep seek v3:

                https://kagi.com/assistant/9201074a-79b2-45e4-b5ee-529a990b7188

                So I donโ€™t think that we can conclude that Grok was altered specifically.

                cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                cure53@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @yonk Phew, okay. We saw those messages in June 2025 and discussed them internally and with friends. Still have access to the conversations from back then.

                cure53@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cure53@infosec.exchangeC cure53@infosec.exchange

                  @yonk Phew, okay. We saw those messages in June 2025 and discussed them internally and with friends. Still have access to the conversations from back then.

                  cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cure53@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cure53@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @yonk Other LLMs claim they existed, for example:

                  Unhandled Thrown Response!

                  favicon

                  (chatgpt.com)

                  Edit: Okay, sharing doesn't seem to work right now ๐Ÿ˜”

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups